Analysis: Consolatory Effects Of Humor Through Cognitive Distraction

M., & Peterson, C. B., 2001). The article took a couple of ideas from its secondary sources in order to see change or altered them in ways were it would get a better more accurate result.

According to the article the information involved it is accurately citied on the reference page. The article had a total of 18 references, with most of them being current. There was a total of five dated back to the last five year, a total of eight dated back to the last ten years, and the last five date back to as far as twenty-two years. For the most part, the references were current with dates in between the five to ten year bench mark, with the exception of the five the exceeded the date criteria. Also, the study was cited twenty-two times in the literature, showing that it has been reviewed and critiqued by other authors.

The talk delineates a detailed picture regarding the power of laughing during stressful periods. Laughing is the simplest and cheapest method to deal with stress. It can relieve pain, reduce pressure, decrease stress, and help to protect self-respect and identity. The sense of humor existed in different countries from a long time ago. For instance, jokes about the Berlin wall in the Second World

This chapter gives an account of published information which provides supportive evidence to the topic. In this review, the author will discuss the method and the search strategy used to arrive at selected articles. The search trail (various searches and outcomes is Appendix 1). Views of different authors who met the eligibility criteria were compared and contrasted which was further synthesised and analysed.

The current study borrowed from the idea that humor influences sentence memory. Likewise, one of the variables tested in this experiment is how well participants are able to recall humorous and non-humorous materials. Furthermore, this study improved upon Schmidt’s study by possibly diverting humor’s ability to command increased attention by adding an extra stimulus to the experiment. With an additional stimulus, it is possible to understand to what extent humor can influence memory retention and whether or not humor has additive affects with other another

The study of laughter and the affects it has on the body is called gelotology. Although laughter may come easy and natural to us, our body has to go through a rather complex process. We don’t know much, but researchers have done studies that have shown that laughter is caused by many parts of the brain. These researchers have done many tests by hooking subjects up to an electroencephalograph (EEG). An EEG is a record of the our brain’s electrical activity. (2013, Babylon) When doing these tests, researchers realized that the brain made the same continuous electrical pattern. The subjects were then shown something that was funny. Not even five-tenths of a second after the subject saw the joke, an electrical waved moved through the cerebral cortex. This part of the brain, the cerebral cortex, determines intelligence, determines personality, motor functions, planning and organization, and touch sensation. Laughter would result after the wave would take a negative charge. However, if the wave took a positive charge, the subject wouldn’t give a response. During the experiments, they found out many wonderful things. Such as, the left side of the cortex studied the words and the context of the joke. While doing so, the part of the brain that takes part in social emotion responses known as the brain’s frontal lobe, became very active. However, to get or understand the joke, the right hemisphere of the cortex had to carry out an intellectual

Individuals when assessing desirable personality traits rate humor among one of the most important traits for individuals to have. Individuals with a good sense of humor are often seen as making a better leader, more likeable, having a healthier personality, and being more intelligent. For this research article Nicholas A. Kuiper and Catherine Leite studied four types of humor, two adaptive types of humor and two maladaptive types of humor. The two adaptive types of humor were affiliative humor which is seen as playful, helps reduce stress, and enhance relationships, and self-enhancing humor, which is described as warmer, more social, and enhances interpersonal relationships. The two maladaptive types of humor are aggressive which is used to make oneself feel better and self-defeating humor which is used to put oneself down, ridicule, and be the “butt” of all the jokes. For this study there were 166 total participants 102 female participants and 64 male participants, the participants were taken in groups of 15-30 people and were given a description of one of the four types of humor and asked to rate on how desirable the traits were for a typical college student.

scientific evidence for a reader to understand the purpose of the article. For example, she broke

The titles and abstracts of the identified studies were screened to identify all potentially useful papers for which the full manuscripts had been available; however, given that this is a systematic-style review the articles were screened by one author only. A more detailed description of the selection process is provided in the results section.

Kuiper, Comeau, Klein & Maiolino (2014) conducted a study in which humor styles were examined on a sample of 94 first-year undergraduate students. The researchers pointed out that the inability to use affiliative humor prevents an individual to use this humor style to manage stress accompanied in social situations and results in increased rumination about negative emotions. In addition, it was also found that the use of self-defeating humor results in negative evaluation from others and social isolation, and thus, aggravate perceived stress.

Comment (one paragraph) on the presenter’s use of the literature to inform his/her diagnosis and/or treatment choices.

Humor is so powerful it can diffuse business tensions. This is a classic: when Eugene Cafiero was president of the Chrysler Corporation, he went to England to resolve an intense conflict between management and members of the union at a Chrysler plant. As Cafiero entered the plant, a man confronted him and loudly declared, “I’m Eddie McClusky and I’m a Communist.” Cafiero held tight his hand and replied, “I’m Eugene Cafiero, and I’m a Presbyterian.” Laughter followed, and it cooled off this confrontation. When a situation is potentially explosive, humor can diffuse it. (Kong, 2013)

2) What were the researchers interested in? What was their hypothesis or what research question were they trying to answer?

My initial response to this article is that it presents interesting information. It also brought along the question of: Who sponsored this research? As I am aware that depending on the sponsor information in studies can be skewed. I can neither agree nor reject these findings, as I do not know enough about this subject as of present.

There is evidence of cross referencing and the article has been updated so it contains up to date information.