Should two stories which feature animal rights and racial statuses have an impact towards their society? Many similarities and differences bring these two stories together. Any little thing may have an impact towards one’s life, culture, etc.Alice Walker’s story; “Am I Blue” takes place in a farm in the United States. Alice was an African American woman who becomes friends with a horse, but had to face seeing him go from being happy and full of freedom to lonely and beast looking. George Orwell’s story, “Shooting an Elephant” takes place in Burma, a small place near India. George was a British man, who worked as a police officer and was seen as the only one able to shoot an elephant that was full of anger. In Am I Blue by Alice Walker and Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell; these are common issues the authors have to deal with. Being called a beast when an unwanted situation occurred was full of emotions. Having to refer back to slavery or experiencing racism and being considered a hero by completing an obligated act wasn’t easy. Both essays face a racial status and animal rights, but they’re different because in Orwell’s story he is seen as a hero for the actions he performs. Blue is the horse of freedom who then turns into a beast in Am I Blue, whereas, the Elephant is a beast from the beginning while destroying a small village in Shooting an Elephant. The actions they take are to be blamed by the humans that surround them. In Am I Blue, Alice Walker states, “Blue
George Orwell describes to us in “Shooting an elephant” the struggle that his character faces when to win the mobs approval and respect when he shoots down an innocent animal and sacrifices what he believes to be right. Orwell is a police officer in Moulmein, during the period of the British occupation of Burma. An escaped elephant gives him the opportunity to prove himself in front of his people and to be able to become a “somebody” on the social
Both stories portray racism in between ethnic
This essay will compare and contrast two different essays one is written by George Orwell “Shooting an Elephant” and “Am I Blue?” by Alice Walker. The settings of both places are different “Shooting an Elephant” takes place in a country in Asia called Burma. In “Am I Blue?” the setting takes place in a house in the country side that stood over the edge of the meadow near the mountains. The characters in “Am I Blue?” are the white horse whose name is blue and Walker, who spotted Blue from the window of her home. Orwell is the main character in “Shooting an Elephant” he is a British police officer who shot the elephant that had killed a man. In both essays the authors are relating themselves to the animal’s pain
George Orwell, author of, "Shooting an Elephant" reveals his inner conflicts to the audience by offering in depth description, using intensity, and symbolism through the act of shooting the elephant. His narration helps him do so by giving descriptive scenarios in the story. Orwell's narration can also be used to examine the role of India and Great Britain at the story's time in history. The narration then allows Orwell to use symbolism in place of description. Orwell uses narration to help explain his inner conflicts and to what is happening in each setting of the story.
George Orwell's Animal Farm shows his opinion of how a communistic government can become corrupt, while Ayn Rand's Anthem shows the extremes of collectivism. Both of these deal with how because of how the happiness of individual freedom is taken in the name of helping the group. This fundamental problem can be seen as the main issue of the characters in this group. In Animal farm there are major problems with the system of the farm causing the animals to feel disadvantaged. The story covers how the farm transitions and the important part is that everything ends up being worse than before. The pigs abuse the system. This is contrasted to Anthem where the system change is successful but is so drastic that again the system doesn't help the members.
This essay describes the experience of an English narrator named Orwell, who was ordered to shoot an aggressive elephant while he was working as a policeman in Burma. As a consequence, the locals expected him to do the job (shooting the elephant), thus he did the job to please the people, but he wasn’t pleasing himself. Orwell’s pain increased by the elephant’s slow and painful death. He had a sense of guilt when he mentions seeing the elephant laying in the ground “powerless to move and yet powerless to die”. In fact, he made himself believe that he was right and it was legal to kill the elephant, by thinking to justify what he had done, stating “legally I did the right thing, a mad elephant has to be killed, like a mad dog, if its owner fails to control it”. On the contrary, Orwell knew that the elephant could have been saved without unnecessary harm, but he chose the latter. In my opinion, I’ve liked other essays more than Orwell’s essay because this one was very hard to read, thinking that it was hard to see an elephant die slowly and killing
Honore de Balzac once said “Equality may perhaps be a right, but no power on it can ever turn it into a fact. This quote connects to the theme “With power there’s never true equality.” Because although equality should be a given, while there is power present in society, it will never happen. Animal Farm by George Orwell is a novel about a farm that is overtaken by its animals. They assign one pig, Napoleon, to power. He began to only benefit the pigs and the other animals were often oppressed. “Mouseland” by Tommy Douglas is a story about cats leading a town of mice, and making rules that only benefitted the cat, and endangered the mice. The common theme in both these stories is similar to the theme the quote presented, “With power there’s never true equality.” The authors of both Animal Farm and “Mouseland” use the narrative techniques of conflict and characterization to illustrate political messages about power and equality.
Orwell is a very descriptive writer who emphasizes a different moral in every essay. He is not simply describing an elephant shooting or a hanging; he is trying to make readers listen to his messages. One of the messages that Orwell wants his readers to understand is the power that role playing has on the human mind. Orwell demonstrates this theme quite easily in both essays. Before killing the elephant, Orwell states, “I had got to shoot the elephant. I had committed myself to doing it when I sent for the rifle. A sahib has got to act like a sahib…”(Orwell: Shooting an Elephant). This statement illustrates how people with power must live up to their expectations to keep that power. He knows he has the power to kill the animal, so he makes himself fit the role of a killer. Power can affect the way people act. A modern day example of this is shown when gang members act on thoughts of the group to gain acceptance by other members. The acceptance gives them power and this is a universal idea that Orwell focuses on. Orwell also stresses power to describe human nature. Orwell likes to use this in both essays because it explains the inconsistency that humans have when power takes over. This is one of Orwell’s morals he stresses to his audience to make them realize the poor decisions people make when in power.
Society can treat individual different from the majority. When one individual is different from the others race or physical appearance. It is hard for that individual to fit in as a normal person. Racism can happen to anybody who has a different race from others. Physical appearance plays a big part on how people treat each other’s in society. In fact, both of the authors, Zora Neale Hurston and Nancy Mairs of “How It Feels to be Colored Be Me” and “One Being a Cripple,” respectively undergo discrimination, self-discovery, and respond differently to these issues.
In conclusion George Orwell essay “ Shooting An Elephant” expresses through his language that pride was something that pushed him to pull the trigger even though if it had been him alone he would have never pulled it. He also showed through his use of colour language and imagery the regret he feels for shooting the
Despite both Orwell’s Shooting an Elephant and Staples’ Just Walk On By occurring in different time periods with different situations, both can be relatable as one can see both characters finding themselves subjected to oppression and societal pressures which lead them to changing their behaviour for the society.
The short essay Shooting an elephant is based off of Orwell’s personal experiences. In the essay, Orwell starts off being quite frank with the readers by revealing some of the uglier aspects of the British Empire. He gives visuals of the jails acting as cages trapping people. He also mentions the anti-British feelings among the population. This is a layered essay; the first layer is Orwell’s story about his feeling of shooting an elephant during his time in Burma as an officer. The underlining point of the essay is about imperialism itself and the brad contradictions it makes. Orwell understands their feelings since the British invaded and destroyed their homes and life’s. “In a job like that you see the dirty work of Empire at close quarters.” (Orwell, Shooting an
The stories of Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell and Am I Blue by Alice Walker, present to readers on how each story can compare the significance of human interaction with animals. Short stories have their ways into composing many complex storylines and implicating different meanings into them. This gives readers the idea that short stories are just not what they read, but is much more complicated than that. In Shooting an Elephant and Am I Blue present different techniques on how readers can analyze and further understand each story. The reader's first look at the conflicts of the stories, as the conflicts show on what the characters have to go through before reaching their goal. Each of the stories show they are only told from one person's point of view, based on their experiences on observing the world around them and the people or things they meet. Also the plot or the events that happen throughout both stories are very similar to each other. The stories of Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell and Am I Blue by Alice Walker can be compared with one another in many ways, such as the conflicts, the point of view and the plot.
In both stories animals are used to represent the effect of imperialism; in A Hanging the dog is used to represent freedom that is being suppressed and in ‘Shooting an Elephant’ the elephant is used to represent the crushing power of those that wield the power in the imperialistic society. The highlight of all the symbols in the essays is how Orwell uses the authority of his characters in order to convey a sense of majority for the idea that only the people that are not a part of imperialism like the ideology. When George Orwell became a part of it he learned the truly devastating effects that few people in Britain probably knew
George Orwell includes a strong message in his novel Animal Farm that is easily recognizable. Orwell’s Animal Farm focuses on two primary problems that were not only prominent in his WWII society, but also posed as reoccurring issues in all societies past and present. Orwell’s novel delivers a strong political message about class structure and oppression from the patriarchal society through an allegory of a farm that closely resembles the Soviet Union.