Analysis Of George Orwell 's ' The Road Of Wigan Pier '

George Orwell once said, “freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear”, that, essentially, “speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act”. (“George Orwell”) Orwell’s words reveal his political views in the absolute truest form. His uninhibited writing style forced readers to not only to listen what he had to say, but to also recognize his writing as the truth. Although his veracity was supposed to be accepted without question, Orwell defined oppressive ideas of the government by exposing elements such as class division, and the failed attempts of the middle class to establish a meaningful union with the working class. Through his symbolic storytelling in

The Road to Wigan Pier’, an autobiography written by George Orwell, was first published in 1937. The first half of this book documents Orwell’s observations about the poor living conditions amongst some working class families belonging to Yorkshire and Lancashire, in the period before World War Two had begun. In the second half, Orwell wrote a long essay about his own experiences in the book where he covered topics such as his middle-class upbringing, the developing ideas regarding his political conscience and also questions British attitudes towards socialism. As well as this, Orwell wrote about his own political beliefs about socialism and also explained how he felt that people would be able to benefit from socialism. Orwell addresses many issues that were prevalent during this period, allowing a historian to gain more of an insight about the impact that this had on people’s lives as well as beginning to understand the effects that this may have had on British society as a whole. In many ways, Orwell’s detailed and vivid descriptions allow a historian to see and understand British society from a different perspective. It can also be identified that to some extent the autobiography allows a historian to be able to begin understanding more about the ways in which British society had become divided during the wars and to be able to understand exactly how this can be shown throughout the text. Although there are many interesting and useful ways of interpreting this document

Due to George Orwell’s many successful works, he has remained a recognizable and respected author from his first moments of fame until now. Orwell’s novels and essays touch on aspects of government and human nature that will always remain relevant. With America’s changing values and controversial times, Orwell’s warning seem more relevant than ever and prove that with strong ideas, a novel can remain current beyond lifetimes.

Throughout history, a divide has always existed between the rich and poor in society. However, during the Industrial Revolution in Victorian England, this rift reached its peak. The working class labored for long hours and received miniscule wages, whereas the bourgeoisie grew abundantly wealthy through the labor of the working class. Published in 1848 and 1854 respectively, Karl Marx’s The Communist Manifesto and Charles Dickens’ Hard Times both comment on these troubles. While Hard Times is a novel which tells a story and The Communist Manifesto is a short publication which tries to bring about social change, both writings offer a sharp critique of the class antagonism brought about by capitalism at the height of the Industrial

With the start of World War II, George Orwell began his fight against Nazism, fascism, and communism. In the eyes of many, communism became interchangeable with socialism, and he criticized writers of his time that were in support of Stalin and his “socialist” movement: “Why should writers be attracted by a form of Socialism that makes mental honesty impossible” (qtd. in Lewis 76)? In an attempt to pacify the radical communist movements and change imperialism, he spoke of a third method to reform the British Empire—a middle ground that would create a socialist community in Britain. John Newsinger wrote, “[He had a] call for a new socialist movement that would reject both Communist-style revolution and Labour Party reformism in favour of a third way to socialism, a third way that he continued to call revolutionary but that was adapted to modern conditions” (qtd. in Chen). Through this, one can see that Orwell wanted to avoid such movements as communism, which attempted to obtain control over the individual, and yet he had a need to preserve the

George Orwell focuses his belief of the “[disbelief] in the existence of the objective truth because all the facts have to fit in with the words and prophecies of some infallible fuhrer”. He envisions the decay of future society and implements his ideas through his creation of “Nineteen Eighty-Four”. Indications of a psychological fear are examined initially through the progression and change of the human mind, which is built upon the oppression of the Party. Through the construction of a world with no freedom and individuality, the human mind adapts the change of truth and pay utter submission from the Party, to escape the presence of their ultimate weakness. With those who are rebellious of the rules of the Party gradually brings out the ugly nature of humanity. Through the fragility of the human mind, it reinforces Orwell’s idea of a corrupted society, as there no longer remains a variety of human emotions for the next generation to pass onwards. Thus conclusively portraying the defeat of human mind unable to withstand the physical and mental tortures from the Party.

Loneliness is something everyone experiences. However, nobody should have to go through the degree of loneliness of being unable to confide in one person. Everybody needs a person. At the start of 1984 by George Orwell, Winston is completely alone and cannot open up about his feelings towards Big Brother to anyone. He is unable to conform to his natural human nature due to a government in total control. George Orwell’s 1984 communicates the threat on society of a totalitarian government by using literary devices such as irony, foreshadowing, as well as characterization.

The Outer Party members (10-13% of the population) are treated to conditions that are described as “bare, hungry, dilapidated place compared with the world that existed before 1914” (Orwell 188). The Inner Party members (less than 5% of the population), the people with the most power, but arguably the worst conditions, have “no freedom of choice in any direction”, as they are under constant scrutiny to ensure they are loyal to the directives of The Party (Orwell 211). Clearly, no matter what tier of society one is classified as being part of, one is affected in a negative way by The Party’s actions. Third, Orwell questions the character of humanity as a whole to demonstrate The Party’s perversion of their original socialist platform. O’Brien states that “humanity is the party”, which is entirely against the power-to-the-people mentality of socialism, as by saying that O’Brien and The Party essentially claim that they have to power to shape what is natural and what is human (Orwell 269). Orwell takes the basic traits of humans, which are supposed to be innate, and puts them into question to show the complete refocus of The Party from giving the people more power to obtaining the power to change humanity to its core. This is how the author uses character to emphasize the consequences of The Party’s platform.

The 1930’s ring of the days of the Great Depression, an era of famine, unemployment, and a healthy balance of economic turmoil. Among these grey signs of the times also rose the works of Authors such as George Orwell and Aldous Huxley, most famously known for their dystopian novels 1984 and Brave New World , which dive into completely opposite yet stunningly similar views of a utopia gone wrong. In each, citizens should strive for a certain “Identity”, one of patriotism and constant labour in 1984 and that of instant and constant gratification in Brave New World.

This study will focus on three aspects of life. As Marxists critics suggested the historical and cultural context of the novel must be taken into consideration. Orwell’s childhood and early life affected his attitudes and values. Ivett Csaszar emphasized on Orwell’s lack of experiences with women which complicated, in her opinion, his concern towards women. The English society was a conservative one. Women had not significant roles in politics or economy. However during the 20th century women inverted roles and entered to the government. This event was highly rejected by Orwell. He believed that women are intellectually incapable to manage political problems and opposed them by writing several essays. Orwell described the prole women just as the working class. They are natural, stable, unconscious and uncorrupted. For that reason they cannot

The purpose of this writing is to summarize a reading from George Orwell, “Politics and the English Language”. The intended audience is Professor Lindholm. The goals of this draft is to clarify the summary in my own words with no opinions. Also, providing enough information about the main points of Orwell’s essay. Based on this draft, I see the strengths falling under the main points of each paragraph and the introduction paragraph. However, the weaknesses are to clarify more in each paragraph. In other words, to elaborate more so the reader can understand better. Since my previous draft, I made a few changes in this essay. These changes include editing a couple of sentences and adding politics in the introduction. These modifications are made in order to conform the requirements of this assignment. My questions are, “Where should I clarify more?” and “Where do you see any opinions?”.

The thesis of the essay is that writing was Orwell’s inevitable and irresistible destiny, although shrouded by his attempts to abandon it. It had always been inexorably and intricately woven into his person, manifesting itself first at 5 or 6, and then ultimately impressing itself on his life with irrevocable and fulfilling finality.

Boris, Orwell’s Russian acquaintance, is no better off than Orwell, but when Orwell and Boris bond together, they are able to cope with poverty together. In fact, when Orwell locates Boris, he is in such a weak and emotionally distressed state that Orwell, “hurried downstairs and bought a loaf of bread” (28). Orwell, who already has very little money, shares what he has with Boris in an attempt to support a fellow member of the lower class. After this incident Boris and Orwell are allied in the search for jobs. In the quest for jobs, Boris and Orwell trek across Paris together to apply for employment. Boris often hinders Orwell because of his limp that often prevents them from finding occupations. However, Orwell does not leave his friend. Boris also uses his connections to find jobs for both himself and Orwell. Neither Boris nor Orwell gives up, “Oh, we shall find something” (29), because they support each other both physically and mentally. Even when Orwell is in a tight bind for money, he asks Boris, “to let me share his two francs” (38). However, because Boris has no money, they both decide to pawn their overcoats. They work out plans together and help each other figure out the best way to make money. Orwell and Boris feel comfortable asking each other for support and are able

I will describe and illustrate an informed opinion based on George Orwell. I will be investigating George Orwell’s approach to socialism. In addition, I will be discovering George Orwell’s personal experiences and views on George Orwell the road to Wigan pier. In addition, I will be investigating how life was for working class people in the 1930’s living in slums. Moreover, I will be illustrating George Orwell’s personal and professional life before writing the book ‘the Road to Wigan Pier’.

In this extract, the Labour Party, and Attlee, do not only detail a programme for the oncoming elections – they also hugely criticize the Conservative Party and their faith in capitalism and privatization of the industries. They defend the lower classes by saying that the Tories have installed in the UK “a restrictive anti-social monopoly or cartel agreements – caring for their own capital structures and profits at the cost of lower standard of living for all.” (l. 28-29). That is to say that the Conservative Party only wanted to make profit by installing a capitalist society to the expense of the lower classes, which were poorer than ever during the Great Depression, and that this type of society only profited the richer classes and the elite. Indeed, capitalism is a type of society whose bases are above all the private property of