W.B.E. DuBois provides many convincing aspects of his criticism towards Washington’s educational platform. One of them is the Atlanta Compromise, one of Washington’s most notable things in his career. DuBois didn’t see what the point of giving up multiple human rights to get an education. The education would be useless if they can’t defend their own rights. Another aspect that DuBois touches on is when Washington played a large role in the disfranchisement of the colored, legal creation of a distinct status of civil inferiority for the colored, and the firm withdrawal of aid from institutions for the higher training of the colored. W.B.E. DuBois’ long term goals for African- Americans were the right to vote, civic equality, and the education
In conclusion, the debate between W.E.B Dubois and Washington was nothing short of remarkable and genius. Although both men had two separate ways about doing things they both shared the same common goal, which was bettering the lives of African Americans. In my opinion, W.E.B Dubois plan to go strongly for African American rights and equality was the better strategy. Not only did he help bring us together but he gave blacks a sense of self confidence that they didn’t possess before. For once blacks believed not only can you be as good as the white man but better. While some may agree that Mr. Washington’s plan to endure the second citizenship title was only degrading and keeping the black man down. Although Washington had honorable goals Dubois gave the people a strong sense of empowerment and worthiness that has helped the black race grows into what it is today.
washington knew that blacks would never be equal to the whites. DuBois wrote a book called, "We want to be Americans, full-fledged Americans, with all the rights of American citizens." DuBois also criticized Washington's Tuskegee approach as an attempt "to educate black boys and girls simply as servants and underlings." DuBois had become the leading black figure in the United States. Dubois encouraged African-Americans to work hard, regardless of their careers. Both Du Bois and Washington wanted African-Americans to have the same rights as white Americans. But Du Bois encouraged African-Americans to demand equal rights. Washington, on the other hand, often ignored discrimination. He believed that it was important for blacks to develop good relationships with whites. He was afraid that blacks who demanded equal rights would create ill will between themselves and white Americans. Washington said to an all white audience that "In all things social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress." That quote meant that blacks and whites can all do the same things. In conclusion, Booker T. Washington focused on having education for real life jobs and not asking for equality from the
Booker T. Washington believed that blacks should not push to attain equal civil and political rights with whites. That it was best to concentrate on improving their economic skills and the quality of their character. The burden of improvement resting squarely on the shoulders of the black man. Eventually they would earn the respect and love of the white man, and civil and political rights would be accrued as a matter of course. This was a very non-threatening and popular idea with a lot of whites.
Dubois said, “Mr. Washington distinctly asks that black people give up, at least for the present, three things, --First, political power, second, insistence on civil rights, third, higher education of Negro youth, and concentrate all their energies on industrial education, and accumulation of wealth, and the conciliation of the South.” Washington believed that the blacks could not move forward without giving up political power, civil rights, and higher education. He thought they had to give up those ideas for now and focus on wealth, industrial education and be friendly with the south. He thought once these objects were accomplished then the blacks could obtain the freedom and rights they wanted. Therefore, he felt that for now the color-line was ok because blacks needed to first earn their rights before they were handed over to them.
W.E.B. Dubois supported being black in America. He supports being that helping hand for his people. He rather see us excel then be against us. He wanted us at peace with each other. He was more of the man that wanted something and less struggling then others. W.E.B. Dubois believed in the higher education of a “talented tenth”, meaning whoever knew their knowledge of culture could guide the rest of us Negroes into a higher civilization and we would have more power. W.E.B. Dubois was more of the leader that we followed behind. He was the light. Being that his experience with mainstream America is different his progress and motive to support black America was different. He was more for us, than against us. Mainstream America thought he was too powerful and forced him to retire because of in-different political views. Opposing booker t Washington who they in fact loved.
Firstly, DuBois presented clearer ideas than Washington did. Washington just requested education for black Americans, whereas DuBois demanded an integrated, legitimate education. There was no room for loopholes in DuBois’ plan, while Washington’s plan possibly could not make any real progress towards racial equality due to its lack of specificities. Also, DuBois’ plans had greater merits in changing the nation than Washington’s plan. Washington’s plan was slightly beneficial to African Americans because it pushed for education for black people in the country, however had no major effect on the status of African Americans in the long-run. He agreed to segregation and racial inequality, therefore he did not ask for any major changes to the racial pyramid of the nation. While Washington did not ask for any significant reforms, DuBois did. DuBois had the goal of making African Americans socially, economically, and politically equal under the law of the country in every way. DuBois wanted to actually change the racial dynamics of the country. The merits of his plan strongly exceeded the goals of Washington’s
W.E.B. Dubois was the rivaling civil rights leader during the early 20th century. W.E.B. Dubois believed that through political action and education, full-citizenship of African Americans in America would be achieved. At first, he agreed with Booker T. Washington’s teachings, however through time Dubois realized flaws within Washington’s ideas. Dubois, in “Soul of Black Folk” writes, “The black men of America have a duty to perform, a duty stern and delicate, -- a forward movement to oppose a part of the work of their greatest leader. So far as Mr. Washington peaches
DuBois’ and Washington’s ideas differentiate in a couple of ways. DuBois stressed that the only ways to reach equality were through intellectual views, education and civil rights. Washington believed equality could be obtained through economic independence and being a productive member of the society he lived in. DuBois strongly disagreed with Washington mainly because of Washington’s idea to put off the discrimination issues. Washington’s “Atlanta Compromise” speech was to advocate African American people’s agricultural and practical skills. DuBois felt these skills weren’t primarily important, since he had set his focus on intellectual views. Another difference between the two was DuBois demanded civil rights in the present, while Washington thought it was best to put them off for the time being. Washington had the accommodation for whites and African Americans to work together, yet DuBois wanted the talented African Americans to lead the struggle to secure civil rights. The greatest difference between them were their political views.
W.E.B. DuBois was a very strong advocate for black people being treated equally to white people. He co-founded the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) Which was a very important part of the civil rights movement. The NAACP was “created to work for the abolition of segregation and discrimination in housing, education, employment, voting, and transportation; to oppose racism; and to ensure African Americans their constitutional rights”. He also created a book called “The Souls Of Black Folk” Which made him more popular, with the main Idea of the book being that the “central problem of the Twentieth Century is the problem of the color line.” He was a man who fought for equality, where Booker T. Washington, on the other hand, did not. Booker T. Washington thought that black people should in fact have different rights then white people, and that instead of fighting it, black people should just accept it, and focus on economic self-improvement. He also believed that black people should not fight for equal rights, because it would lead to more anti-black violence, such as lynching which is the act of killing someone, most commonly by hanging, by mob action and without legal authority. By these facts you can tell that Washington and
One of the primary differences between DuBois and Washington was in the ways they believed equality would be achieved. DuBois believed that political change was the first step in achieving equality. If the black populous worked on economy only then they would perpetuate the stereotypes that white people place upon them. By accepting racist and prejudicial viewpoints, the African American communities were affirming their inferiority to the white majority. Only through political equality, for example the right to vote, could men enact any real or meaningful social and
The school system in the country districts of the South is a disgrace and in few towns and cities are Negro schools what ought to be...and...when we call for education we mean real education,” he effectively made his audience view the logic in his claim about racial equality with a specific emphasis on the education of adults and more specifically children (DuBois 2). Mr. DuBois, being the well-educated man that he was, understood that by presenting his claim of educational importance in a logically and sound way, his audience would be exponentially more likely to agree with his view and act on his cause, which is exactly what transpired after his speech. In Mr. Washington’s attempt to persuade his audience in favor of educating the African American population, he chose to appeal to his perverse audience 's sense of desire and ambition. He stated that by “casting down [their] bucket among many people, helping and encouraging them as [they] are doing on these grounds, and to education of head, hand, and heart, [they] will find that [African Americans] will buy [their] surplus land, make blossom the waste of places in [their] fields, and run [their] factories” (Washington 2). In stating his claim the way he did, he hoped that his audience, which was comprised primarily of white, land-owning southerners, would realize the possible economic benefits that would result from educating the black population, and that their innate desire for material wealth would drive them to
W.E.B. Dubois focused on a strategy called the gradualist political strategy. The gradualist political strategy tells that Du Bois was very focused on African Americans being book smart to get anywhere in life. He believed that they should be just like white, with high education and IQ’S which all came from reading, writing, and organized education. He felt the smarter the African American got, the more equal they were to the whites. African Americans felt like it was impossible since some grew up working in farms not growing up attending school like Du bois
The most debated topic concerned around education. Booker T. Washington urged that in order to survive the Southern racial oppression, “silence, hard work, and the accumulation of wealth … [were] mandated.” Washington explains that “it is the duty of the Negro … to deport himself modestly regarding the slow but sure influences that proceed from the possession of property, intelligence, and high character for the full recognition of his political rights.” W. E. B. DuBois staunchly refuted Washington’s remarks on black education. In his Souls of Black Folks, DuBois challenges Washington’s accommodationist ideology. DuBois strongly believed that “the South ought to be led, by candid and honest criticism, to assert her better self and do her full duty to the race she has cruelly wronged and is still
Despite this, Du Bois points out the many downfalls of Washington’s attitude and beliefs about the way in which black people should approach not only their education, but also their basic human rights in America. It’s stated that Washington preaches the idea that black people advance by practicing submission in the forms of forfeiting political power, “insistence on civil rights”, and higher education, instead focusing on industrial education (39). Du Bois shows how problematic this is because of the far reach Washington and his ideas have. Du Bois argues that these particular conventions have, though not as a direct result of Washington, but more specifically because of his propaganda, had much more detrimental consequences for African Americans
After analyzing critically the assigned reading, it is evident that this reading has a thesis statement at the end of its introduction; Here he criticizes "the old attitude of adjustment and submission" that had been articulated eight years earlier by Booker T. Washington in the "Atlanta Compromise Address." Subsequently, this reading is logically arranged. The reading discuss issues from most important issue to minor ones, thus this helps the reader to grasp the author’s ideas easily. Consequently, the author of this reading starts by introduction, which gives the reader the clue of the issue that is going to be discussed. Thus through clear introduction, the author catches the attention of readers since they want to read the entire reading