Analysis Of ' The Campaign Game '

Primary elections are elections held previous to a Presidential election to decide upon the presidential candidate from the two main parties. These are held in each state, each of which then goes on to sponsor the winning candidate of their primary at the national convention, where the party’s presidential candidate is announced. This method of choosing a candidate came about due to the McGovem/Fraser Commission of 1968 (where Mayor Daley refused McGovem the chance to run as he was too liberal). It replaced the old system of decisions being made in ‘smoke filled rooms’ where party bosses were all powerful and made the decision.

The road to the presidency starts when a candidate announces plan to run for office. This launches the candidate’s campaign. Candidates campaign to win support from delegates. The first stage of a presidential campaign is the nomination campaign. At this time the candidates from the same party compete, for the nomination of their party. The candidate works to secure support of their nomination from representatives at the national party convention and sway potential voters. The next step to presidency is the Caucuses and primary elections.

Typically, potential presidential candidates that secure wins in the early states during the primary sequence gain tremendous support going into the following elections. According to Mayer and Busch, victory in the New Hampshire primary increases the expected total primary votes of the candidate by 26.6 percent (Mayer and Busch 107). Increased attention in the media drives up the popularity and support of candidates, and success in the early primary states offers a massive boost of positive media attention. Approximately 50% of total primary coverage in the mass media is centered around Iowa and New Hampshire, the better part of which is dominated by the winners (Mellman). Members of parties typically want to maximize the chance that the candidate they support will win in the future. When candidates win early primaries, it also signals to party members and elites that the candidate can win, and is therefore, a viable option for the party. Oppositely, losses in the early primary are often interpreted as signal of weakness, and can deter voters in the future primaries.

candidates buy the election. At first glance, this may not appear to be all too much of a problem.

Before the primaries, a presidential candidate was chosen by party leaders. These leaders include important officeholders and party officials, such as activists who

Even if a presidential campaign began very early, many candidates are not willing to undertake a path so significant regarding the primary problems of today and the consequences in the future. For example, Hilary Clinton or Jeb Bush as well as senators R. Paul and B. Sanders don't really have clear position, in fact, they focus more on the ambition to be president, neglecting important issue.

For the people that don’t have much education or don't know much about a candidate, this would be a perfect opportunity to find out a little more information for the voter can know on which candidate is better for them. The bottom line of a campaign contains ideas that whichever candidate shares with the eligible citizens. It is meant for getting people to agree with there plans if they were to win a type of political office. They do this for they can support them while running for that political

In short, the Presidential Campaign is long and tough an often in the beginning you may have up to seven opponents all trying to win their party nomination to run against the other party winner on a national level. Therefore, each of the candidates will hire a team to manage his or her campaign and each team goal is to convince the public that their candidate is the best choice and it’s their job to help get their candidate message on the primary elections and then on to the national elections.

The national and state parties are now actively involved in the campaign support functions that private campaign consultants and other political groups had monopolized until recently. In addition, the increasing strength of the national parties has also altered their relationships with state and local party organizations. Moreover, the strengthened national parties perform a number of vital functions in presidential campaigns. Both national committees’ research issues study the opponent’s record and background, and search for their own candidate’s weak points and ways to stop attacks. They train state party staff and field directors and maintain relationships with important groups in the party’s network. (Party Politics in America

Campaigning is working towards a specific goal. The two movies I have chosen to compare and contrast are The Campaign, and The Last Hurrah. In some cases, the goal may be small but in the movies I chose, the goal was in fact being elected so it was pretty large. There are many different types of campaigns and each one has a different outcome. Some of the outcomes may be positive and others will be negative, it’s all about the approach in a tough election. Even though Campaigning may mean capitalism, Different types of campaigns reach out to potential voters and In person campaigning works well.

Including the media outlets and how far technology has come along. For one whenever a potential campaign takes place now a televised debate can be broadcasted on a local station easily obtained by basic cable. Secondly with the different type of smart phones available social media plays a major roll on interaction with the people. With phones being able to essentially hold access to everything through social media it’s a key way candidates have reformed their campaigns to cross over into those waters

Elections in the United States are tremendously expensive. Between the two candidates of the 2012 presidential election spent almost $2.5 billion(208). It is easy to see how with the cost of transportation, merchandise, hotels, arenas, and television ads everything accumulates at an extremely fast pace. Due to this candidates must campaign for funds and support prior to the election.

Another technique I would advise would be social networking because mass majority of people are always on social networking sites. Sites such as Facebook and Twitter helps people advertise their product and to become known. It allows candidates to communicate faster and reach citizens in a more directed manner. This helps keeps the candidates involved and see immediate reactions and feedback by the conversations and debates that are generated online. This will help bring in new support and participation in the campaign. When new status with messages are posted on to these social networking sites they can be liked or shared with others, which allow a new audience to be influenced. This is also a good way to get the attention of the younger generation like college students because they are always on these sites. When you are able to get

Both campaign contributions and media coverage has significant power to determine the success of a presidential candidate, and each of them seems to be interconnected with each other. The media has the power of fast deliverance of information, reproducing to an audience of mass quantity, and ability to distort the candidates’ authenticity. Though it largely relies on the campaign contribution that gets the attention of the media. However, it is the media that is more important in determining the likely success of a presidential candidate because of their coverage on a stimulating competitive race, complexive variety of biases, and techniques on issue framing.

In one's democratic society, voting is, perhaps, the most major form of communication in telling how they feel about particular issues and viewpoints. Because of a ballot's potential power to change the course of public policy, it is important to make informed choices to make the best outcome in ultimate decisions, lest a care-free choice could yield unintended consequences. With candidates in mind, perhaps one of the best sources to examine their goals is their campaign website, as they tend to list initiatives that they wish to achieve and a plan on how to do so. Since a candidate's website is unlikely going to have biased opinions (other than what the candidate believes), voters can get a clear understanding of their overall ideals. A second choice is from an accredited media source. The media can give perspective and shine light upon lesser known facts of a candidate, with some of this information being something a candidate doesn't wish for the public to know. Of course, news sources such as Fox News and MSNBC tend to have more notable idealogical leanings than others, but nevertheless try to expose information of opposing candidates, allowing the public to formulate an overall opinion. In more broader terms, radio and television have also allowed for better access of debates; the public, in turn, getting to string information together.