The debate regarding the usefulness of early exposure to technology is one that has lasted for years. In her article, “The Digital Parent Trap” Eliana Dokterman argues for tech fluency by writing that early uses of technology has more advantages than disadvantages. Her use of statistics counter arguments supports the points that she makes. Statistics are one of the most common types of evidence used in the passage. They back her claims and add legitimacy to what she writes. She connects her first claim that technology helps with education, to statistics from an SIT study saying that internet games can improve kids’ scores. This is then connected to the effectiveness of engagement provided by technology, which is backed by more statistics.
In her essay, The Digital Parent Trap, Eliana Dockterman carefully builds her argument by using ethos, pathos, and by using purposeful word choice to strengthen her argument that there are benefits to early exposure to technology for children. She supports her claims with evidence by using quotes, and by citing data from research studies and interviews. She leaves out any fluff and unnecessary words which makes the words remaining even stronger.
In this document Eliana Dockterman writes about how traditional views of childhood consumption of technology with emphasis on “screen use” is outdated and technology usage should in fact be embraced by children. Dockterman is able to effectively portray this argument through the use of a variety of persuasive techniques.
Nicholas Carr’s target audience is anyone who uses technology, whether they are the younger generations for it or the more traditional generations against it. He establishes common ground by pointing out some of the positive, along with the facts to back up his theory on the negative. His motive for writing this essay is to provide a connection between the increase of technology to the decrease abilities in learning behaviors.
In this brief editorial adapted by Eliana Dockterman, "The Digital Parent Trap" portrays the current battle between a child's world with and without technology. As many schools and parents are split between the two decisions, Dockterman finds a way to be the tie breaker through her persuasion and smooth rhetorical devices. Docktermon tries her best to convince the readers that technology is okay in moderation, and builds her argument through word choice. With the formality of her diction and her many reliable sources to persuade the reader, she seems to have everything she needs to get the job done.
In Eliana Dockterman's passionate article "The Digital Parent Trap", the author builds her argument to convincingly persuade her audience that there are benefits to early exposure to technology which will greatly affect future generations. The author effectively employs use of persuasive and argumentative techniques including factual evidence and research, appeals to emotion, and well-supported statements from professionals.
Twenge is thorough and credible in listing the many ways in which youth and young adults of today are affected by new technology. The article was intended to prove that children who grow up with a phone or tablet in their hands will have
According to the article “What’s the Matter with the Kids Today”, many adults believe that new technology is consuming the minds of young people. Amy Goldwasser uses research from Common Core surveys as well as Doris Lessing’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech to create her argument. Goldwasser uses these examples to explain that if parents and teachers better understood the use of technology, students wouldn’t be punished for their overuse of technology today.
In today’s society we are overwhelmed with technology. Technology is changing everyday, and will forever be a staple in our lives. The effect that technology has on our children has brought on some concerns and some praises. Children these days have no choice but to some how be influenced by the ever growing technology in our societies. Our common concern has been that although digital technology has boosted children’s talent for multitasking, their ability to process information deeply may be deteriorating (Carpenter, 2010). Many people have a wide range of opinions on if technology is having a positive influence on our children or a negative, there is a vast amount of evidence to support both of these arguments. Technology can refer to
Technology has advanced a lot within the last couple of years. It definitely has its pros and cons when it comes to how it affects our personal lives. Some people may take this to an extreme and become very dependable on their technological devices. There is a large gap between the generations of when all there was, was pen and paper and now where we see even 6-year-olds with the latest iPhone. In “What’s the Matter with Kids Today” by Amy Goldwasser, the author explains how different life was without technology and how it's so commonly used now.
Hanna Rosin argues that children are spending too much time with technology, which could lead to poor mental development. Rosin recounts her experience of going to the dust or magic convention where app developers met together to discuss their projects and learn from each other. Rosin goes on to discuss change; for a long time there was only television which could be easily controlled by parents, but with the advances of technology it is now everywhere and much more difficult to create a controlled environment for children. Rosin also questions whether some good could come from the use of technology to balance the argument in her article.
Author Elliana Dockterman employed data in the Article “The Digital Parent Trap” to demonstrate that not only digital devices are prevalent among the American children, but the prevalence of these devices can also stimulate children’s memory developments. These two parts combined highlight the central thesis of this article: widespread technology use among children can have many positive influences. In the first paragraph, Dockterman listed the statistics of child usage of three different devices. As “27% of children use tablets, 43% use smartphones, and 52% use laptops”, it can be undoubtfully said that electronic devices are very common among children in America. Dockterman again returned to the use of data in paragraph 10, citing a research
The students in school all the way to university level that are currently studying are considered the “Digital Native” generation (Prensky 1-6). This is the generation that was born into technology and have always had computers, video games, cameras and mobile phones as part of their lives. They have grown up playing computer or video games, emailing, instant messaging and browsing the internet. They have always had a plethora of information at their fingertips and this has shaped their ways of thinking and processing data, as compared to the previous generations. While some speculate as to whether their early exposure to digital technology has affected their physical brain structure and patterns of thought, it is agreed that they definitely approach the world differently. (Prensky 1).
There are many different outlooks on the way technology affects children today. Eliana Dockterman addresses those viewpoints and encourages the benefits of technology by using statistics and facts, while also providing negative and positive connotations of words specifically and repeating specific words to emphasize his message.
The current generation of children is completely different than the preceding ones. They are living in the digital age. “Technology has blended in with daily activity to become a way of life and children today take for granted all of which is automated. It is hard for kids nowadays to imagine a world that existed without all of the gadgets, electronics and seamless operations that computer technology provides.” (3) “Children in the United States devote some 40 hours a week to television, video games and the Internet.” (12) Many psychologists and researchers are concerned about the impact that technology has on children. Children, tomorrow’s future parents and leaders, are being consumed by the negative effects that technology had on their
Evidently, technology represents an inevitable and increasingly integral part in modern society (Aduwa-Ogiegbaen and Iyamu, 2005; Stafford, 2010; Watt, 2010). The abundance and accessibility of available technology within our homes is enabling children to develop technological skills and understanding from an early age (Medcalfe, 2013; Tucker, 2014; Simpson, 2013). Prensky (2001) postulates that this exposure and immersion with technology is instrumental in shaping children to become ‘digital natives’ enabling them to interact with technology on an