Analysis Of The Four Phases Of Emergency Management

During a National catastrophe and short amount of time for properness the federal government should take control regardless of the situation and work with local officials who would know the area better. When a city declares state of emergency is should be mandatory that the federal government can now have more power to execute a plan and available funds to provide. Local city officials should see the federal government not as a threat or as if they cannot handle the situation but more of an extra relief. Seeing hurricane Katrina was the biggest hurricane since 1975 everyday planning for this big of a natural disaster is not expected. In the past ten years it seems more and more natural disasters are taking the lives of thousand and costing states to fall. With proper technology giving local state officials a better outlook on time and planning is the first step in saving their communities. Executing and working with federal government showing them their local plan can give the federal government a better perspective on the scenario as well. By working together and having boundaries set will only save

Enacted in 1988, the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, also known as the Stafford Act, is a United States federal law that lays out the framework for federal disaster assistance. It establishes a process for declaring disasters, determining response levels, and dividing up costs among federal, state and local governments, depending on circumstance. The intention of the law when it was created was to encourage states and local entities to develop comprehensive disaster preparedness plans, prepare for better intergovernmental coordination during a disaster, encourage the use of insurance coverage, and provide federal assistance programs for losses due to the disaster.

The four phases of a disaster plan will consist of Preparedness Efforts, Mitigation Measures, Response Phase, and the Recovery Function. This is where I will describe each part in its own section of this essay.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would become the central point-of-contact within the national government in responding to incidents. Since formation in 1979, FEMA’s core missions were to enhance the government’s ability to survive a foreign attack, and to assist state and local authorities in disaster response (Carafano, 2005). And while the two core missions seem heterogenous in scope at times from an outside perspective, the biggest difference between the two tasks is duration. A man-made disaster may be over in a matter of minutes as compared to a hurricane lasting several days, but in both instances the road to recovery is long. In order to streamline response and recovery in either scenario, FEMA was reorganized with new directives to support comprehensive emergency management practices (CRS, 2006). Today, FEMA provides the standard approach and guidance that many local communities may not have due to funding, training, and

Within the constitution, there is no explicit clause that grants the federal government to provide relief for natural disasters, and therefore under the 10th amendment the power is in that of the states, not the government. However, despite this recently the federal government has been held accountable to providing relief efforts. In addition, there is no way to change the constitution to give the federal government this power, as neither can the legislative, nor executive, nor judicial branch can add/change the constitution, and therefore this power must be returned to the states. The article suggests that through the federalist papers, the founders wanted the states to unite together, and provide relief to each other as the states, not the

Ensuring Resilience to Disasters has more tasking’s than another mission and involves many different agencies to accomplish those tasks. The four tasks are to mitigate hazards, enhance preparedness, ensure effective emergency response, and rapidly recover. The main agency that is responsible for these tasking’s is FEMA. FEMA’s mission is to “reduce the loss of life and property and protect communities nationwide from all hazards, including natural disasters, acts of terrorism, and other man-made disasters” (FEMA, 2017, p.2). FEMA works with federal and State services to assist them in accomplishing their goals. They also assist local services by assisting in setting up emergency management agencies (LEMA) and set guidance for Emergency Operations Planning (EOP). EOP’s are “plans that provide an overview of the jurisdiction’s preparedness and response strategies. It describes expected hazards, outlines agency roles and responsibilities, and explains how the jurisdiction keeps the plan current.” (FEMA, 2010,

There are many ways to describe emergency management and the importance of the tasks emergency managers perform. Indeed, in

When a disaster such as a hurricane takes place, the first responsibility is of the state’s governor to make a formal request for a state of disaster and receive the necessary assistance and aid to the affected area (The Disaster Hanbook- National Edition, 1998). The President of the United States of America must make a declaration of emergency and major disaster to initiate the effort to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (The Disaster Hanbook- National Edition, 1998). Once a disaster has been declared, the U.S president will send supplementary funds to the state and local efforts to aid the affected population (The Disaster Hanbook- National Edition, 1998). In order for funding to be dispersed to the area in need, the President of the United States must allow this action to take place.

State and local responders formulate the concepts within the FRP around disasters and emergencies that can be handled “the Federal Government is called on to provide supplemental assistance when the consequences of a disaster exceed State and local capabilities” (p.11). If assistance is required by State, and local agencies, the Federal Government has the ability to deploy a wide range of assets to aid state and local efforts during the disaster. The Federal Government has a large contingency of support personnel, teams, operating facilities, specialized equipment, and assistance programs that allow for disaster operations. “The FRP describes the major components of the system, as well as the structure for coordinating Federal response and recovery actions necessary to address State-identified requirements and priorities”

Under the 1988 Stafford Act, the federal government guidance is to support the disasters only if they are of “such severity and magnitude beyond their state and the affected local government’s capabilities to support the disaster” (Edwards, 2014). The Governor may request to the president to declare an “emergency” or a “major disaster” if federal assistance is needed (Edwards, 2014). An “emergency” declaration usually considered when a hurricanes hit, whereas “major disaster” declarations is after disasters to render aid to state and local governments and individuals (Edwards, 2014). In the past, 86 percent of major disaster declarations requested by governors to the president have been approved (Edwards, 2014).

This is a review of Emergency Management: The American Experience 1900-2010 by Claire B. Rubin and Butler (2012), chapters 1 and 2. Emergency management at the federal level was nonexistent before 1950 when the Federal Disaster relief Act was passed. Disaster relief was the responsibility of state and volunteer agencies like the Red Cross. Several disasters paved the way for emergency management. The Galveston Hurricane of 1900, the San Frisco Earthquake of 1906, and the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918 were the disasters that laid the foundation for the 1950 Federal Disaster relief Act (Butler, 2012, pg. 17).

For the past 35 years, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, commonly known as FEMA, has been dedicated to preparing, protecting, responding and serving the American people following major disasters and crisis. Effective on April 1, 1979 under President Jimmy Carter’s administration and funded through federal funding, FEMA has been committed to preparing, protecting, responding and assisting in recovery efforts in the state as well as the local government during crisis and disasters. Similarly to any agency, FEMA has faced many challenges when providing funding to victims and survivors of disasters. Critics have criticized FEMA in their response to disasters.

There has been a great development in the way the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) responds to natural disasters. Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Sandy, and wildfires in California are three major disasters that required a large FEMA response and recovery effort. These three natural disasters stressed the resources and abilities FEMA has in their arsenal. As any good organization does, FEMA learned from their experiences and mistakes in order to handle the next challenge they have to face accordingly. Hurricane Katrina affected over 15 million people, caused $81 billion in property damages, and 90,000 square miles (11 Facts About Hurricane Katrina). There was much controversy over the response of the Federal Emergency Management Agency

Federal regulations at 44 CFR 206.44(a) require the Governor, acting for Colorado, and the FEMA Regional Administrator to execute a FEMA-State Agreement. The FEMA-State Agreement outlines the understandings, commitments, and conditions under which Federal disaster assistance will be provided. In its FEMA-State Agreement, Colorado agreed to comply with the “requirements of laws and regulations found in the Stafford Act and 44 CFR.” Also, 44 CFR 206.207 requires Colorado to develop a State Administration Plan that outlines the actions Colorado will use to fulfill its duties to FEMA. Accordingly, FEMA is responsible for holding Colorado accountable to both the FEMA-State Agreement’s and the State Administration Plan’s terms and conditions. The Colorado “State Public Assistance Administration Plan for FEMA-4145-DR-CO Declared 09/14/2013,” page 2, states, in pertinent part, that the

The burden of emergency management has grown great deal in the last few decades. We have seen an increase in natural disasters, a new threat of terrorism on our front door and an increase in manmade disasters. All of these have tested emergency management in a number of cities and towns across the nation. It is not always disasters that present problems for emergency managers. We have to look beyond our traditional view of emergency management of helping us during times of disasters and view what issues they consider may affect their emergency response. Issues that emergency management see that are moving into the critical area are issues of urbanization and hazard exposure, the rising costs of disaster recovery, and low priority of emergency management.