Analysis Of The Interview Process

The client was arrested and detained by the ICE in Miami due to previous removal order. His Motion to reopen was denied because it was bared for untimely and past several motions to reopen; and he was waiting for deportation. The client hired us to appeal the denial order of Motion to Reopen. The client’s former employee filed a labor Certificate prior to April, 2001 and his USC sister’s immigration petition was approved many years ago. The BIA granted our Motion to Reopen. We successfully obtained a bond before the BTC and transferred his case to the immigration Court in S. Carolina, where his sister resides. The client continued retained June Zhou as his attorney. We asked for adjudicating status based on I-245(i) before the Immigration Court in S. Carolina. However, at the day of the final hearing, our client was panic and did not show up at the Court. Attorney Zhou had to file another motion to reopen, which was granted by the Immigration Court.

Applicant’s attorney, Mr. Juan Vera, appeared representing the applicant’s interest. Court reporting duties were provided by Ms. Elizabeth Maeyama, License No. 12060. Interpreting services were provided by Ms. Berta ZeFrench, Certification No. 36353581. The deposition started at approximately 2:24 p.m. and lasted until 3:15 p.m. The applicant testified that she arrived at applicant’s attorney’s office at 1:00 p.m. to prepare for her deposition; therefore, I anticipate applicant’s attorney’s office’s §5710 invoice to be for no more than two hours and 15 minutes. I will make a more specific recommendation regarding the yet to

The petition alleges that the preventable death of the daughters of Ms. Gonzales and the damage they suffered violate her rights to life and to the safety of the person enshrined in Article I, her right to privacy and family life provided in article V, his right to protection of the family, provided in article VI, his right to protection of motherhood and childhood, in accordance with article VII and his right to the inviolability of the home, provided in article IX of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (hereinafter, "the American Declaration"). The petitioners add that the fact that the United States did not investigate Ms. González's complaint or provide her with a remedy violates her right to justice, enshrined in Article XVIII, as well as her right to obtain a quick decision from the courts. authorities, provided for in Article XXIV. Finally, the petition maintains that the fact that the United States did not ensure the substantive rights provided for in the articles listed violates Ms. Gonzales' right to equality, as provided in Article II. In response to the petition, the State argues that the petitioners' complaints are inadmissible because the alleged victim did not exhaust domestic

COMES NOW Respondent, John Deaux, respectfully requesting, pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.14(a), review by an Immigration Judge of the custody and bond determination made by the Department of Homeland Security.

This memo is to look at the people who applied for the positions that, I the clerk of the Maricopa County Superior court was interviewing for. The hiring selection is very essential for Maricopa County Superior Court and I must determine who the most outstanding candidate is who fits the position. Also, I also must recognize what I can improve in the courthouse.

Officer Daron Nelson adjudicates most I Form and N Form types adjudications. He assists at the Info Counter for customer inquiries. He helps with naturalization ceremonies as needed. He is very flexible for changes in schedule when needed. He does not complain, if pulled for interviews during his exam time because he understands the changing demands of our office.

Referred cases for submission to the Notice To Appear (NTA) Review Panel when during a naturalization interview it was discovered either by the file review, fingerprint/law enforcement database results or interview statements that an applicant is subject to removal from the United States. Analyzed all factual and legal circumstances of the applicant’s case and reviewed the totality of the circumstances to include factors such as: severity of crime, time since crime committed, other criminal conduct, reformation, immigration history, including method of entry, length of presence in the U.S., and prior immigration violations, and contributions to society to include the pursuit of education and military service. After consideration of all these factors prepared a detailed written recommendation to the NTA Review Panel on the issuance of an NTA or to exercise prosecutorial discretion in the case. Conducted N-336 hearings (Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization) for individuals appealing the denial of their application for

Please describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant's response. (250

The respondent is a married male who is a native and citizen of Mexico. The Department of Homeland Security initiated removal proceedings pursuant to their authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act upon filing a Notice to Appear with the Fairmont Immigration Court. In the Notice to Appear, the Department of Homeland Security charged the respondent with being removable from the United States under Section 212(a)(6)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The respondent admitted factual allegations one, two, and four in the Notice to Appear. The respondent denied factual allegation three. The Court sustained factual allegation three. The Court found that the respondent was removable from the United States as charged in the Notice to Appear.

• Provide information in response to public and Congressional inquiries both orally and in writing.

As lead I-751 officer, deal with joint and waiver petitions for removal of conditions and adjustment of status cases that require making independent determinations under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Within 9th Circuit court jurisdiction provides additional guidelines for immigration matters depending upon current court rulings. New polices from headquarters about current political trends and priorities all provide directions for making decisions with all adjudications of adjustment of status and naturalization applications. With my work, I am required to justify my conclusions in administration and criminal proceedings. I have been called to testify as

Attempts were made to serve the Defendant JUAN ESPARZA via personal service. Affidavits of due Diligence attached hereto as exhibit “A”.

(b) If new and material evidence is submitted, the Appeals Council shall consider the additional evidence only where it relates to the period on or before the date of the administrative law judge hearing decision. The Appeals Council shall evaluate the entire record including the new and material evidence submitted if it relates to the period on or before the date of the administrative law judge hearing decision. It will then review the case if it finds that the administrative law judge 's action, findings, or conclusion is contrary to the weight of the evidence currently of record.

Manages and prioritizes multiple tasks and priorities to ensure that the appeals process is timely.

1 WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING STEPS PRECEDES THE HONORS TO THE NATION IN A NORMAL SEQUENCE OF EVENTS FOR A REVIEW? INSPECTION