preview

Analysis Of We Are What We Eat: Feminist Vegetarianism

Decent Essays

Bailey, C. (2007). We Are What We Eat: Feminist Vegetarianism and the Reproduction of Racial Identity. Hypatia, 22(2), 39-59.
This article (written by a professor at Western Michigan University) explores the link between diet and racial/social identity. The author draws many parallels between meat consumption and oppression while acknowledging that vegetarianism is often considered a privileged status. She states that the most oppressed groups in society have the least access to fresh, healthy produce, and are the most likely to have diets that are high in animal based protein. She also points out that many non-western diets are vegetarian based and are not considered elitist. She would argue that the elitism surrounding access to fresh produce …show more content…

The authors, social work and sociology scholars at York and Brock Universities respectively, demonstrate that waste pollution, antibiotic resistance, chemical pollution, climate change, poor working conditions (both physically and emotionally), disease development, and deforestation are just a few of the consequences attributed to animal exploitation via factory farming. The authors argue that social problems such as exploitation, oppression, inequality and poverty are intimately linked with animal exploitation.
This article was the most comprehensive source found linking animal rights with human social welfare. Some of the article’s sources may have been biased and did not come from peer reviewed journals. While the strong bias works against the article, the authors did a good job supporting their argument with facts from a variety of sources. This paper does a good job outlining the problems associated with factory farming, but it failed to address how society can address the problem, thus additional sources are necessary for a complete view of this social …show more content…

It will provide valuable talking points as well as facts for my paper.

Wolf, D. B. (2000). Social Work and Speciesism. Social Work, 45(1), 88-93.

This commentary argues that although speciesism is frequently addressed in many philosophical and psychological disciplines, it is often left out of the social work discussion. The author begins by quoting J. Adams, a founder of the social work profession, in order to show that animal rights have been important to social workers from the beginning. He offers many facts and vignettes to support his idea that animal rights are intrinsically linked to human rights, and offers advice on how to implement changes in the field of social work.

This article was cited by many of the other papers that I read while conducting my research, and I feel that it is a starting point for many social workers attempting to understand the importance of animal rights. It is a biased paper, but all of the author’s opinions are supported with facts. The author is attempting to convince social workers that there is a gap in their education that must be

Get Access