Analysis: The American Perspective On Hackers
The issue of public information has always been a controversy in our world. One of our country’s founding arguments was based on the necessity of free speech and free information. Many now believe that our government is being overly restrictive on information, blocking and controlling some aspects of free speech that first amendment advocates feel are necessary to maintain our American society. These advocates of free information have been using the nickname “hackers” for over twenty years, but improper use by the media has stretched the word to slanderous levels. Hackers are now stereotyped as mindless vandals and miscreants, although the word “hacker” has been used as a term for computer
…show more content…
The irrationality of this fear is proven by the contrasting attitude of technically oriented society.
The technically oriented part of society is made up of (at the very minimum) very advanced home users, capable of modifying parts of their computer and fixing most problems. This sect also includes network administrators and operators, most programmers, and most computer hardware specialists. Not all programmers or hardware specialists fall under this description, because many of them do not have or need a full understanding of a computer in order to complete their job. These technically oriented people have enough knowledge about computers so as to not automatically resort to fear.
Most of them understand the vast difference between a cyber-vandal and a true hacker. In fact, most of them have acted as either a cyber-vandal, hacker, or both at some time in their past. They generally see that actual hackers are not intent on damaging things.
Actual hackers are content with the free spread of information and thought. The people that technically inclined individuals avoid and sometimes fear are the delinquents and vandals who find it amusing to damage and ruin data. In an attempt to make people think they are anything more than attention-starved brats with computers, these vandals prefer to be called hackers.
The most amazing set of opinions comes from the
In Herbert B. Dixon Jr.’s “Is Hacking the New Normal?”, the author is trying to convince the world to pay better attention to the technology in their lives. Dixon is addressing why he believes that the new “normal” is to live in a society where all technology is hacked and vulnerable all the time. Dixon creates the implied message that everything is a target, and should be handled as if it is a primary target of hacker’s attention and time, because it just might be. Dixon’s ideas are backed by statistics given by Peter Katel in his article “Identity Theft”, regarding the number of people that are attacked and how hard the economy is hit by the breach in security. Thus, showing just how many are attacked and giving validity to Dixon’s ideas about sources of information breaches. This source brings to light other sources of potential security breaches, and gives a new perspective regarding just “accepting” this new era. Dixon gives valid ideas on how to increase your safety but ultimately describes that nothing is completely safe.
The Facebook,Instagram, and Twitter social media sites with passwords that can be hacked no matter the “strength” of the password. Peter Ludlow effectively persuades using ethos,logos and pathos in the reading What is a ‘Hacktivist’? By talking about events that have happened to “Hacktivist” in the recent years due to “Lexical Warfare.” Lexical Warfare irs a phrase that I like to use for battles over a term is to be understood. When people think of hackers, the first thing to mind is people who sit on computers all day and steal information from everyone possible. The previous sentence provides an example of how people think of the word “hacker” because of what media tells people. It either gives them a good thought if you think “hacktivist” are doing right or unpleasing thought because it makes people feel unsafe since hackers can hack into whatever they please.
Hackers – A person who uses computers to gain unauthorized access to data. Most hackers use Trojan which is a malware disguised as harmless software. The intent of the hacker is to get people to click on links and phishing scams. When a person who is clueless believe it’s from somebody close to them or coworkers. But, it was hackers trying to get in through emails and stuff and they use many tools.
For most, the word hacker brings up an image of an unscrupulous person. Unfortunately, the government sees hackers as one big collective group of terrorists. So it uses outdated laws to convict these hackers as terrorists. If the government does not amend the current laws used to prosecute Internet crimes, then the Internet will be restricted to the point where innovation ceases. Innovation cannot be performed when government regulations limit the internet. Most would assume that a hacker has malicious intent, but what most don’t know is without hackers, the Internet would be a much less secure environment. Many hackers only have the intent of helping websites fix security issues that could be exploited by the general public. If the government continues on its current course, laws will be
We are essentially exposing ourselves and, more importantly, personally identifiable information to a number of cyber threats every time we worked on our laptop. Hackers, often with the help of malicious software, do their best to steal information from personal devices for the benefit of themselves or a third party. EBay, for example, revealed that hackers had managed to steal personal records of 233 million users’ personal information, including usernames, passwords, phone numbers and physical addresses between February and March in 2014. Moreover, damage that derived from cyber-attack also have an impact on national economy, which increase a further risk of living hood of the public. According to the AP, U.S. intelligence officials have said that cyber-crime currently trumps terrorism is the biggest threat to the country’s security. According to research from Arbor Networks, the number of DDoS events, Distributed Denial of Service attack, topping 20GDPs in the first half of 2014, are double that of 2013. With more than 100 attacks at over 100GDPs or higher recorded in the first half of the year in US. Posed by cyber-attack, the devastating impact on individual and the nation has begun to attract attention of the public. Given by IT governance nonprofit ISACA, it was said that 92 percent of respondents felt that advanced persistent
What kind of a personality must a hacker have? It is obvious that someone who hacks
The resilient hacker-activist group Anonymous started out on an online based site for entertainment.Furthermore; the group began to establish more concrete goals towards political and social change. The team magnificently relies on and influences information technology to share and convey they are personal communicating to the whole web world. This paper will provide awareness on Anonymous 's ideas, interpret these ideas and gauge the potential profits and significances, and regard security concerns that have been of conflict. The group 's recently established main agenda is to promote free speech and share of information, fight censorship and fight absurd intellectual property restrictions.To helps shed light on what this group is about: “And this I believe: that the free, exploring the thoughts of the people is the most valued in the world in Nevertheless, We would fight for the freedom of the mind to take any course it desires, aimless. And this I must battle against any idea, religion, or government which limits or destroys the individual.
("How Hollywood portrays hackers" Andrew Brandet
What would later turn out to be one of the deadliest hacks in the history of cyber crime began when actor Seth Rogen and screenwriter Goldberg Evans joked about producing a comedy that would feature the assassination of North Korean’s leader Kim Jong-un. A few months later, the reality of the joke dawned when Sony Pictures Entertainment made an announcement that both Rogen and Goldberg would direct the movie dubbed “The Interview.” The movie was to be officially released toward the end of 2014. However, just before the release of the movie a tragic incident unfolded that left hackers in total control of Sony Pictures Entertainment Network. A group by the name The Guardians of Peace (GOP) had breached Sony Pictures Entertainment and brought their operations to a standstill. The hackers stole over a hundred terabytes of private date containing salaries, Social Security Numbers, movies, and others personal identifiable data. A few days later, the stolen data started popping up on the internet along with GOP’s demands including a warning not to release the movie “The Interview” (Sanchez, 2015). In this paper, an analysis of the motivation behind the attack and response to safeguard against further breeching will be dealt with.
At our citizens’ homes, they are in danger because about 61 million Americans computers connect to WiFi. There is not enough security found looking into the vast majority of citizens’ home computers. In result, this aggravates them as a simple target to a majority of data robbery and classified documents being destroyed (Smith ¶5). This shows we as citizens need to be more aware of what is going on in our computer systems because we can be affected immensely. Additionally, the individuals that hack for scholarly incitement are not always fundamentally criminals. We have our white hats (ethical hackers) in our corner to protect our nation, so our vulnerabilities can be kept locked (Rutherford ¶13). Our ethical hackers are resources that come in handy, and our problem is having few people go into this job area and it complicates the issue more. Gregg, CEO, and founder of Superior Solutions Inc. states; mobile devices can be used to track prominent figures in our world for assassination or kidnapping, in order to gain a financial outcome (¶10). In fact, terrorist are becoming more cultivated in educating themselves on computer crime techniques (Matias ¶2). Since cyber-terrorist are becoming more equipped with computers it is difficult to keep up with their skills, and it is affecting our nation's prominent figures putting them in danger which the result is putting our nation in jeopardy. If we as citizens become more dependent on technology, the less safe we are, and our boundaries become broken (Weed ¶19). Our boundaries are broken because we have no safety net to bring back all of our classified documents/personal information about ourselves; which, in turn, may ruin a citizen’s life. When we have employees travel to a place, a numerous amount of them are ignorant to foreign hackers (Weed ¶2). We as citizens are putting ourselves in a naive mindset, and we cannot do this because we are setting ourselves up for destruction. Our nation should understand that; “Protecting the nation’s computer infrastructure from terrorists and saboteurs is one such challenge and it deserves nothing less” (Loy ¶12). If we open our eyes, we can see what is going on around the world, and stop it from destroying us.
How hackers have changed our world, and views on society since the 1990’s to present days
Hackers are given more of a free pass than other “deviant” communities are from society because of the high-level anonymity in the community, their motivations are claimed to be honourable, and the high amount permeability of computer culture into the mainstream normalizes their behaviour.
They have formed their own subcultures and hold many different beliefs about the information that is stored in personal computers. Said best by J. Thomas McEwen in the article Computer Ethics many hackers believe that "computerized data [is] free and should be accessible to anyone (McEwen 1991; 8-11). A subculture is a group a group of people who share a different set of beliefs that differ significantly from the larger society (Kendall; 604). Besides forming subcultures, many hackers have learned their behavior from other hackers. Besides the fact that many hackers learn, their ways from other hackers many after arrested are formally labeled as a hacker and a deviant, those who violate cultural norms and beliefs (Kendall; 598) The labeling theory suggests that deviants are those have been labeled as such by others (Kendall; 166). As written by David Pitch ford in the London magazine, Focus, one hacker after being arrested was not deterred, he instead became a more active and in "92 became cyberspaces first megastar Pitchford; pages 10-13)." It was only after his second arrest that he stopped offences.
As every body knows the net isn’t the most trusting region; measures are had to guard people from harmful threats and vulnerabilities. The CIO need to recognize that if the business enterprise doesn’t defend their windows and Unix/Linux servers from unknown shortcomings and vulnerabilities, the organization may get attacked by means of hackers, who need to steal confidential statistics to commit crimes, harm/damage the organization and/or the facts the corporation has saved on its computers. Hackers normally uses codes or malware inside the shape of viruses, worms, time bombs, Trojan, and so forth. to deprive an employer’s network infrastructure and it’s community running system(s). Typically when they do that, they are trying to steal records, consisting of, credit score card and numbers, and assets data, social security numbers, and a lot of other personal information that can be crippling to the business and the employees, and something else that would be used to identify someone or help reproduction an enterprise. these hackers, however, aren’t constantly after records. Nor do they usually try to attack software, occasionally hackers try to decrease laptop performance, that could have an effect on their velocity and motive the computers to crash, that can advantage the attackers in some manner. The CIO need to have a manner to shield the agency’s community infrastructure from such catastrophes. With that said, the network infrastructure must be greater cozy.
card fraud; identify theft, and all other types of crimes. Hackers are people who use their computer