Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

College athletes should be paid because of the hard work, dedication and effort they put into their respective sports. These athletes are a major source of income for their schools and they are not receiving a penny for it. These college athletes deserved to be paid, colleges are using these athletes to get money and they are never given anything but a pat on the back and a good job. College athletes work and train extremely hard to perform at the highest level possible. In most cases, they spend more time training and preparing for their sport than they actually do learning and studying. They put so much on the line to play and they get nothing in return. These college athletes literally make their schools millions of dollars every

Many believe that college athletes should not be paid. The main debate against compensating college athletes is that they are at the university for educational purposes and playing sports is a benefit. The NCAA states, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (McCauley 10). Universities get all the financial benefits of the money earned from sports played from things such as team jerseys, sports passes and tickets, etc. Many argue that it is only fair to give a portion of the profit to the players that earned the money. It is very important when arguing for or against paying college athletes to not take into fairness, but to hold

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has been rewarding University athletic programs across the nation for many years now. Allowing coaching staff and others to make money off of the athletes in these programs. Athletes, however, do not get any compensation for the hard work they put in to earn the National Collegiate Athletic Association the multi- million dollars of revenue each year. The athletes are expected to give an “all in” type effort while keeping up with their rigorous courses. A recent ruling that Northwestern University football players have the right to unionize and begin to receive that compensation from the NCAA proved many people wrong and stirred up the pot between supports and non supporters.

The NCAA or the National Collegiate Athletic Association in its 2014 total fiscal revenue collection data racked up a whopping $989 million dollars, nearly reaching a billion dollars according to USA Today Sports in article done by Steve Berkowitz. The biggest revenue earners in NCAA sports are men’s college football and basketball, with those two sports alone making $166 million alone. In addition to that $166 million, the television revenues from viewers, ticket sales, and merchandise purchases add another surplus of hundreds of millions of dollars unaccounted for. At times going respectfully to the university as their profit, where for example a standalone college like Texas A&M in the year 2014-2015 generated a total revenue of $192 million itself, which factored in ticket sales, rights/licensing to the team’s name, contributions, and other sources of revenue, according to USA

With debate on whether or not to compensate the college athletes in monetary terms due to the students’ sports talents help their various colleges to receive awards both rewards and cash money, it is important to look at criticisms of the National Collegiate Athletic Association with regards to the association’s advertisement deals of approximately more than a billion shillings profits yet no athlete is being compensated for his or her hard work. That according to Zimbalist (2013) is because the critiques are using the very developments to argue in favour of the payment of the student athletes since the opportunity for education and exposure to earn a professional contract is enough compensation since the cost of paying the student athletes would be too high.

The National Collegiate Athletic Association is a business that keeps expanding while the players it supports make nothing. This year the NCAA announced that they are on the verge of reaching the one billion dollar mark in annual revenue. Last year they pulled in an astonishing nine hundred and eighty nine million dollars. Most of its profit growth comes from the division one men’s basketball tournament, which accounts for eighty to ninety percent of their success. With all this incoming profit some players feel as though they are entitled to a piece of the pie. There are currently lawsuits pending and some players have even gone as far as attempting to unionize. Although they are receiving scholarships and get a lot of other assistance,

An employee is often a person who is hired to perform for an employer in payment of wages. Since 1881, unions have formed for workers to operate safer and together in a place of work. College athletes around the world are trying to convince officials that they are employees who are hired by organizations to play college sports. Right now, college athletes are not paid to perform. Other than scholarships, which are not enough to cover all expenses, they don’t see any acknowledgments. College athletes should be allowed to unionize to become recognized official employees of the NCAA and other organizations and receive a payment.

Should College Athletes be Paid? College athletes commit their blood sweat and tears for their respective schools. However, all this hard work and still do not get endorsed any money! As of today, college athletes are not paid but are expected to play to their full potential day in and day out.

Did you know that the average men’s basketball fair market value per player is $289,031 per year, and they don’t get not a thing from it, isn’t that crazy. This is very unfair because if the college athletes have to play their best even when they're sick or hurt and who is the real winner the NCAA because they’re the ones that get the money. College athletes should be paid because they work so hard in the classroom and it the gym because they have to do double what everyone else does. They need money to live because when you’re a college athlete you don’t have time for a job with your tight

If you have ever wondered why college athletes are not paid, you are not alone. If you are a sports nut, then you may have even gotten into arguments over the topic. Economic experts do not seem to agree either. If you listen to each side of the argument the answer seems gray, but if you look at the evidence the answer may become clearer. The National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) should pay Division I student-athletes who participate in men’s basketball and football, because of the amount of money they accumulate for the school and NCAA, because the sport they are a part of is a full time job, and also because many student-athletes struggle financially.

The industry of collegiate sports is a billion dollar business. Each year the biggest, most popular colleges receive massive amounts of money from hundreds of the most popular names and companies. It is highly overlooked that the profits being made is all in part to the elite performances of their top athletes. With it being absolutely no secret that these players never receive even a penny of these earnings. A majority of the best athletes are playing with a full-ride scholarship in their back pocket, so people automatically think that that alone should be more than enough to get them through college and be satisfied. But as time goes on and the idea of presenting pay to these young adults becomes more and more talked about, it is considered

College athletes should be paid because they bring in millions of dollars for their respected colleges every year. College athletes perform in front of millions of people. Colleges sell athletes jerseys or other merchandise of a player. College athletes put in hours upon hours of work on and off the field but they don't get anything for it. These are the reasons college athletes should be paid.

The cost of college sends many families entering the concept of debt and debating whether or not to risk the money to send a child or children to college. Be that as it may, 1%-2% of college bound students receive athletic scholarships, adding up to a total of over $1 billion a year. Even though large sums of money are handed out and many athletes chose to go to college many of them do not take the opportunity to finish and the remaining scholarship is wasted. College athletes that receive a form of financial aid or scholarships should be required to stay a full four years; otherwise, if they choose to abandon their education they should have to repay the remaining scholarship so it is not wasted. Requiring an athlete to stay a full four years gives them the option to explore other

College athletes should be paid for playing. athletes are working late and not getting enough sleep. If they get payed they don't have to weary about work. If they stay at work after hours they might not be retry for a game.

I'm going to represent to you the side of the argument that does not feel like college athletes should be paid. The first argument is that student-athletes already received scholarships and other benefits. As stated in text “While not all student-athletes are on scholarship, many are, particularly those who are playing for schools we see winning National Championships. In addition to free tuition and room and board, these college athletes also often receive stipends to help towards books and other basic needs.” So with help towards tuition and textbooks and essentials, student-athletes shouldn't need the extra money to get through college, mainly because the funds used for their tuition and dorms and textbooks don't need to be paid back to the