Analysis of Jeffery Rosen's: The Naked Crowd Essay

With the rise of the internet, some people argue that privacy no longer exists. From the 2013 revelations of government surveillance of citizens’ communications to companies that monitor their employees’ internet usage, this argument seems to be increasingly true. Yet, Harvard Law professor Charles Fried states that privacy, “is necessarily related to ends and relations of the most fundamental sort: respect, love, friendship and trust” (Fried 477). However, Fried is not arguing that in a world where privacy, in its most simple terms, is becoming scarce that these foundations of human interactions are also disappearing. Instead, Fried expands on the traditional definition of privacy while contesting that privacy, although typically viewed

For example in the setting of a workplace the power does not pass from the top down; instead it circulates through their organizational practices. Such practices act like a grid, provoking and inciting certain courses of action and denying others. Foucault considers this as no straightforward matter and believes that it rests on how far individuals interpret what is being laid down as "obvious" or "self evident", institutional power works best when all parties accept it willingly. Foucault's notion of power is a difficult notion to grasp principally because it is never entirely clear on who has the power in the first place, once the idea is removed that power must be vested in someone at the top of the ladder, it becomes much more difficult to identify what power is or where and whom it lies with. Foucault believes that we are used to thinking about power as an identifiable and overt force and that this view is simply not the case, because it is taken for granted that the above statement is true then it is much more complicated to comprehend power as a guiding force that does not show itself in an obvious manner.

A Surveillance Society by Thompson and Hickey is about how public surveillance is everywhere, looking at everything, and is never turned off. First, the PATRIOT Act was passed by Congress shortly after 9/11, and has allowed the government to start watching people. Ever since then the U.S. has increased its use of cameras in public places. Today, just about everywhere businesses and shoppers are, there are cameras. High-tech surveillance devices are more prevalent across populated areas. Corporations, agencies and even individuals monitor social areas with surveillance. With today’s technology, cameras are able to scan images and identify people. Organizations regularly share databases, swapping personal information. Some are opposed

Despite being a social animal, every human being seeks seclusion and solitude within the open mirror of society. Privacy is inherent in the behavior

In the twenty first century, everyone is gluing their eyes to bright screens, and keeping their minds and mouths shut. The public mindlessly releasing information through dangerous domains, like the Internet, poses a great issue. Citizens do not realize where their information can be used and why it is used. This unfortunate circumstance is seen in Peter Singer’s “Visible Man: Ethics in a World Without Secrets.” Although there is a sensation of isolation for the public in this century, there should still be a great amount of openness when it comes to social and political events that involve information, and the ways that data is collected for these purposes.

Out of the increased abuse of surveillance emerges human fear, as an overdose of information leads to a paranoid society, whose skeptic lens distrusts everything and attempts to micromanage all portals of information, and a suppressed society, whose fear of discovery inhibits its expression. In Winston’s world of telescreens and thought police, the idea of privacy is nonexistent. The looming presence of Big Brother’s face “[is] as though some huge

Jeffery Rosen claims that every since the bombing attacks that took place on 9/11 has caused us to put our privacy up in exchange for acceptance and seems that people are more okay with it than they should be. According to Rosen, it already seems that privacy is already, in a state of advanced decay and every since 9/11 privacy has seemed to get thrown out of the window for a sense more of acceptance than for safety. Rosen thinks that "the naked machine" is partly what is to blame for this. He believes that the machine is unnecessary, absurd and humiliating. Within the article Rosen gives examples, instances, and even quotes people that have been a stooge to the naked machine. Another thing Rosen blames for this is the want for a connection

As a growing topic of discussion, privacy in our society has stirred quite some concern. With the increase of technology and social networking our standards for privacy have been altered and the boundary between privacy and government has been blurred. In the article, Visible Man: Ethics in a World Without Secrets, Peter Singer addresses the different aspects of privacy that are being affected through the use of technology. The role of privacy in a democratic society is a tricky endeavor, however, each individual has a right to privacy. In our society, surveillance undermines privacy and without privacy there can be no democracy.

Modern day power originates from the mind in that we give certain figures power based upon man-made forms of value or worth like money. The definition of power has fluctuated throughout time, and while the past may have emphasized the more violent aspects, today, we have shifted towards a more control based interpretation. Both Michael Foucault and John Berger delve into the idea of power and its functionality. Based on their texts, in our current socio-cultural setting, power is best exploited when the concept behind the power is deindividualized for many purposes, internalized by the people, and integrated throughout society to the point that its origins is mystified.

Agger (2015), in his book Oversharing argues that society is undergoing a stage of deboundarying—a term that he uses to describe the lifting of privacy boundaries in favor of “letting it all out” (p.3). He believes that our fast paced, 140-characters-or-less world has provided an arena where it is acceptable, even encouraged, to bare all. While

The concept of power may always be debatable. What exactly makes someone or something powerful? French Philosopher, Michel Foucault builds off of Jeremy Bentham’s idea of the panopticon in his writing of Panopticism. He develops the social theory “Panopticism.” Through Foucault’s fascination with the panopticon, he demonstrates the impact constant surveillance has, not just in prisons, but also in society as a whole.

Before Victoria, privacy was only a prerogative for royalty and the elite. But as she reigned, the concept of privacy was finally an integral part of middle-class life —"the cult of domesticity matched by a cult of privacy." (Summerscale) However, the human desire for privacy became synonymous with the dark recesses of human hypocrisy —which, in a society that lived for appearances, privacy served its role to protect people from themselves. Such an allure engaged writers into exploring the secrets they hid from themselves.

In this essay I shall compare James Scott’s theory of power and resistance with Michel Foucault’s, as in what similarities do they share in their structure of theories; and contrast the difference as in their understanding of power, position they take to look for/into power, exercise of power and resistance in response. By contrasting the two approaches on the subject of power and resistance, I shall argue, if one wish to look for the powerful and the weak, Scott’s approach is the go to. But for now, I find Foucault’s idea more plausible that we are surrounded by or inescapable from power, and that by any means, are not necessarily forced to submission; rather as freedom the same time.

Technology is great for sending quick messages but shouldn’t be a place where we are always communicating. In order to have more authentic relationships we shouldn’t use technology for creating relationships because you truly can’t learn about one another if you’re not communicating in real life as well. What we put out on social media is often times fabricated or enhanced to depict a life that we aspire. We can edit text or pictures to our discretion and even delete images or texts, which we can’t do in real life, which is why we tend to prefer texting and social media because we have

This essay is going to focus greatly on the concept of power that not only adults have upon their children but also the power that cyberspace has upon them too. Foucault describes power as “the operation of the political technologies throughout the social body” (Foucault, 1983, p.185). This refers to the way that he believes power can be found in all different kinds of situations. Gallagher (2008) provides that Foucault saw power as being exercised rather than possessed. This is because power “acts upon actions” and by doing so, in the most extreme cases, it can constrain a particular action taking place (Gallagher, 2008, p.144). Also, when Gallagher (2008) draws upon Foucault’s work on power, it is noted that this idea of “action upon action” is not deterministic because it may not always produce the anticipated effects. This is because there are always going to be