Analysis of Kant´s Ethnics, Punishment, and Dealth Penalty Essay

1585 Words 7 Pages
Death penalty means sentencing the convicted to execution as carried out by the state and the judicial system. Set it in stone that the definition of death penalty is much more deeper than this. The argument of the death penalty is something that might not see an end anytime soon. It is deemed controversial because at stake is the life of an individual,his values, his morals, and dignity. Whether he still obtains morals and dignity is in the eye of the beholder but nonetheless should be taken into account. Ideals of utilitarian as well as retributivism are taken into account when discussing the death penalty and whether it is morally just, or immoral as well as ethical. Retribution along with the key words previously stated are just as …show more content…
Death penalty means sentencing the convicted to execution as carried out by the state and the judicial system. Set it in stone that the definition of death penalty is much more deeper than this. The argument of the death penalty is something that might not see an end anytime soon. It is deemed controversial because at stake is the life of an individual,his values, his morals, and dignity. Whether he still obtains morals and dignity is in the eye of the beholder but nonetheless should be taken into account. Ideals of utilitarian as well as retributivism are taken into account when discussing the death penalty and whether it is morally just, or immoral as well as ethical. Retribution along with the key words previously stated are just as important if not the most important word with respect to the death penalty. We will be looking at Kant’s ethics and his placed values on individuals as well as Kant’s theory of punishment and death penalty. Kant published Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals in 1793 which is heavy on the philosophy of morality. Alongside Kant, we will be looking at Bedau and Marshal suggestion that Kant’s two ideals is at odds with each other. These two, being his ethics idea versus his theory of punishment. Marshall’s use of the 8th amendment with regards to the death penalty being legal versus ethical is also well played. In the midst of these oppositions Pojman’s Kantian argument will be mentioned as well in which it depicts what some believe a huge
Open Document