Analysis of Lopez vs. Gonzales Court Case Essay

Security is a big problem to many people, they will be happy to know that immigrants aren’t criminals, in fact they are less likely to commit a crime than someone born in the United States. Research shows that immigrant men around the ages 18-49 are one fifth to one half as likely to be imprisoned than Americans (Pérez-Peña). This illustrates how twisted our view is on immigrants, media has pinned immigrants as dirty criminals. With President Trump in office, his single sided view on immigrants only makes things worse. Not only are immigrants law-abiding, they also take up arms and protect our nation; around 8,000 noncitizens join the military each year (Powers). These patriots will lay down their life for America and Americans still persecute them, this is unacceptable. Lastly, the logistics of coming to the United States after a long journey and a fruitless life only to be incarcerated doesn't make any sense. Furthermore, study shows that even illegal immigrants pay their taxes when they could easily get away with it. "Undocumented immigrants are trying to abide by the law and are fulfilling their civic and financial responsibilities." Say’s Magaña-Salgado, filing their taxes and abiding the law helps them in judicial cases (Blanco). The

Over the last quarter of a decade, illegal immigration and enforcement have dominated mainstream policy making (Meisnner, Kerwin, Chishti & Bergeron, 2013). There has been a lot of public debate too, on whether or not the successive governments of the US have been able to effectively address illegal immigration and its enforcement thereof. However, as Meisnner et al. (2013) state, in the wake of the terror attacks of 2001, a paradigm shift appears to have been established, with the enforcement of illegal immigration taking a de facto stance. As such, as Dreby (2012) intimates, the number of immigrants who have been deported or removed from the US since 2001 has risen from 190, 000 to close to 400, 000. Considering the fact that there are more than 11 million illegal immigrants living in America, deportation on such a large scale without a doubt will result in a continuous chain reaction. One such consequence, as The New York University School of Law (2012) states, is that families are inherently broken apart by the removal of a family member. Additionally, there are other psychological and psychosocial impacts on families that are far-reaching. Because of these and many other compelling factors, this paper argues that the US should work to prevent deportations, rather than enforce them.

Jae Lee v. United States of America should have been an open and shut case back in 2016. Jae Lee, a noncitizen permanent resident, was convicted of being in possession of ecstasy with the intent to distribute. Because of his noncitizen status this particular offense qualified as an aggravated felony under the Immigration and Nationality Act, meaning he was subject to mandatory deportation. Lee’s court appointed attorney continually advised him that if he “took a plea bargain he would not be deported stating ‘the government cannot deport you’ if deportation was not in the plea agreement” (Jae Lee, 2017). Lee contested that had he known taking a plea would result in deportation he would instead have tried his luck at a trial.

Referred cases for submission to the Notice To Appear (NTA) Review Panel when during a naturalization interview it was discovered either by the file review, fingerprint/law enforcement database results or interview statements that an applicant is subject to removal from the United States. Analyzed all factual and legal circumstances of the applicant’s case and reviewed the totality of the circumstances to include factors such as: severity of crime, time since crime committed, other criminal conduct, reformation, immigration history, including method of entry, length of presence in the U.S., and prior immigration violations, and contributions to society to include the pursuit of education and military service. After consideration of all these factors prepared a detailed written recommendation to the NTA Review Panel on the issuance of an NTA or to exercise prosecutorial discretion in the case. Conducted N-336 hearings (Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization) for individuals appealing the denial of their application for

The case revolved around Appellant, McCauley, who was hired as a Correctional Sergeant at Avenal State Prison. His new position began on December 2, 2008 and was subject to a 12-month probationary period before becoming permanent. On December 1, 2009, the California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation (CDCR) served McCauley with a notice of rejection removing him from the position effective December 8, 2009. On December 2, 2009, another document was served on him extending his probationary period until December 8, 2009. McCauley contended the papers were invalid due to the CDCR’s failure to comply with timing and notice requirements in relation to the duration of the probationary period. He appealed to the California State Personnel Board which agreed with him and revoked the notice of rejection. The CDCR thereafter challenged the finding by filing a writ of mandate in the trial

To conclude, The united states is a country built up of immigrants. The topic of illegal immigration is complex topic and is brought up time and time again over the years. There are many point of views. Every time its brought to the light nothing is done. Some people want to immigrant to be deported others want to immigrant to get granted amnesty or something that will help them be legal in the states. Its a tiring topic and you star to loose hope that one day you’ll be able to stop hiding. People say they don't want to immigrants to be citizens because some are criminals but for immigrants who have been here for many years even for immigrant who just came here also don’t want criminals to be here many left to because of that. Immigrants who

The Federal Court allows for the application for “judicial review of the removal order and the decision of the Immigration officer regarding eligibility”. If the application reviewing officer has any concerns regarding the claimant, and determines that the applicant is not eligible for the refugee status based on one of the four key grounds mentioned above – the case is most likely to be appealed through the court.

Jeremy Ruíz will be free on parole, but he will have to meet certain conditions. The same day he was released from prison, a group of lawyers challenged the constitutionality of article 404 of the Controlled Substances ACT in an argumentative hearing celebrated at the court of law in Bayamón, related to Martin del Valle’s case.

Five years after the incident, U.S. District Court Judge Ruben Castillo, who was responsible in

Time was up, an officer got into phone with dad, he briefly explained the issue and he said Pibe will be deported if he is found guilty in court hearing next month, meanwhile he will have to be in jail.

Per the denial letter received dated September 6, 2016 I disagree with USCIS finding. According to the denial reason..."USCIS finds that you (Aline Gutierrez)do not meet the good moral character requirement for naturalization because you are currently in probation."

The majority of people deported from the United States each year are never given a chance to have their claims heard in court. People denied of their due process rights include asylum seekers, children, people with mental disabilities, U.S. citizens, and people lawfully working in and visiting the United States. They already had rights or claims to stay in the United States — but that wasn't enough to protect them. For these individuals, their fates were decided by immigration enforcement officers, not judges.

In June 2007 Gonzales was granted approval to appeal his conviction and his sentence. The Supreme Court determined that statements taken from Gonzales by police on the night of the murders may be inadmissible, as he was not

General Motors is one of the world's most dominant automakers from 1931. After 1980s economic recession the main goal for automobile companies was cost reduction. Customers became more price-sensitive. Also Japanese competitors came into market with the new effective system of production. So market was highly competitive and directed toward price reduction. The case states that in 1991 GM suffered $ 4.5 billion losses and most part of the costs of manufacturing was due to purchased components. GM NA hired Lopez in order to find the way from "extraordinary" situation and reduce costs.

An abundance of research has recently been conducted showing how immigrants are affecting the justice system in the United States (U.S.), primarily if immigrants are to be at fault for the United States’ high crime rates. Some people believe immigrants are often to be put to blame for the amount of crimes past and presently occurring. Legal immigrants are perceived as unlawful citizens to which strain the United States’ justice system. The immigrants strain the system through committing violent crimes and increasing crime rates. On the opposing side, other people believe legal immigrants are not predominantly accountable for the crimes in the United States. Subsequently, legal immigrants cannot be overcrowding prisons if they are not even committing felonies. Native citizens are equally or even more guilty for the substantial amount of crime and overpopulated prisons. Legal immigrants come to the United with upright attitudes and intentions for the betterment of their lives. These people are accompanied with ambition to have a better life for themselves and their families in a new country. Immigrants with a legal residential status do not a have a relationship with committing majority of U.S. felonies and increasing crime rates.