Andrew Jackson Indian Removal Act Analysis

Andrew Jackson was a General in The United States army, and the 7th president, throughout his presidency he experienced many struggles with the Native Americans like wars and land disputes. In the 1830s he wanted to end these conflicts so he put in place the Indian Removal Act of 1830. I believe Andrew Jackson rightly and correctly removed the Indians. Even though many Indians died along the way Jackson had a reason behind what he did and should not be to blamed for their deaths.

Robert V. Remini shows that Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Act benefits the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson made notice of the issue with the Indians in his inaugural speech on March 4, 1829. He declared that he wanted to give humane and considerable attention to the Indian’s rights and wants in respect to the government and people. Jackson knew that meant to get rid of all remaining tribes beyond the Mississippi River. He (Jackson) believed that the Indians would be better off in the west; without the influence from the white man or local authority. Jackson hired two Tennessee generals to go visit the Creeks and Cherokees to see if the Indians would leave voluntarily. In that, those who did not leave would be protected by the

On May 28, 1830 the president of the United States of America, Andrew Jackson signed the

The Indian Removal Act, inspired by Andrew Jackson; the 7th president of the US and the enhanced ambition for American settlers to find more land in the southwestern regions of North America. The Indian Removal Act enabled Jackson the power of negotiating removal treaties with Indian tribes east of the Mississippi. Among these tribes were: Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaws and Seminoles. Very few authenticated traits were signed. The Choctaws were the only tribe to agree without any issues. All other attempts resulted in War and blood shed for both white settlers and Indians. The conflict with the U.S. and Indians lasted up until 1837. In 1838 & 1839 Jackson forced the relocation of the remaining Cherokee Indians;

Andrew Jackson was the seventh president of the United States, he won the presidential race for his support of farmers and workingmen. His role as president led him to pass nine treaties and Indian Removal Act, although everything he passed was not what was promised. There are now questions about what the removal was, how Jackson got it passed, and is it what the Indians expected it to be? President Jackson got the Indian Removal Act passed on May 28, 1830, when it was passed it said that the move west would be voluntary and peaceful, although Jackson and his administration had other plans for the Indians and their land.

The Indian Removal Act was a piece of legislation signed by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830. The Act resulted in the transplantation of several Native American tribes. The law gave the president permission to negotiate with southern Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their lands. This ideology originated from President Andrew Jackson’s call for an American Indian Removal Act in his 1829 State of the Union address.

During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.

Authorizing the president to exchange unsettled land west of the Mississippi for Indian land within state borders, the Indian Removal Act was signed by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830. Being pursued for nearly thirty years, the relocation of the Indians was desired primarily for pecuniary advantages and the termination of the contention between white settlers and “dangerous” Native Americans. While some tribes accepted their inevitable fate, many resisted and faced harsh government and social brutality. As a result, Jackson’s presidential administration is tainted by the 4,000 lives lost on the Trail of Tears, the separation of the Native Americans from their ancestral lands and cultural ties, and the condemnation of the Native people

Former President Andrew Jackson was responsible for putting the Indian Removal Act of 1830 in place. It forcibly removed five civilized Native American tribes— Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole—from the southern United States. The act would stay in effect until the end of the Second Seminole War in 1842. Native Americans’ feelings toward the United States government have changed from one of annoyance to disgust since being taken advantage of during the Indian Removal Act. In this research paper I will illuminate the political issues involved with the Indian Removal Act by examining whether Jackson’s decision to move forward with the Act was constitutional, defining the

President Andrew Jackson was “renowned as a skilled Indian fighter” after the battle of New Orleans in 1814. Over a decade later, with no surprise, Andrew Jackson forced the Cherokee tribe out of their homeland in Georgia. The Native Americans were under United States Military guard as they marched many miles on the Trail of Tears until they reached present day Oklahoma. A quarter of the tribe died on the trail due to starvation and disease; therefore, Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy was inhumane.

During the presidency of Andrew Jackson, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The proponents of removal including President Jackson believed it was in the best interest of the native people to be relocated west of the Mississippi. The debate for Indian removal included several arguments to justify the government’s actions.

Jackson’s removal policy did not sit well with a lot of groups; many were uncomfortable about it but agreed it had to be done. President Jackson showed great leadership apart from everything else, and handled the Indian Removal act when no one else wanted to address the growing issue of Indian problem. Most government officials saw little to gain from addressing this and would do nothing. Some historians believe the president’s motivation was clearly out of concern for the Indians customs, their culture and their language, but his first concern was the safety of the military, Indians occupying the east might jeopardize the defense of the United States.

Andrew Jackson, in his message to Congress “On Indian Removal”, referred to the Indians as “a few thousand savages” and “the red men”. He was trying to paint a picture of an uncivilized and warring people. He did this in order to gain support from Congress on his plan to relocate the Indians away from areas that he felt would be better suited to the “white man”. Conversely, Michael Rutledge referred to the white man in emotional terms. He described the actions of the soldiers and the people that were watching them walk to their new home. As he continued, he relayed how angry he was becoming and that “I hate those white soldiers who took us from our home;” “I hate the white people

President Andrew Jackson's policy towards Native Americans was highly partisan, favoring Americans of European ancestry, and detrimental to Indians. Jackson essentially wanted Native Americans to vacate lands that were integral to the U.S. at all costs. What is most significant about this fact is that he was not the only one who wanted to see this wholesale change in the landscape of the country. Despite some noble efforts on the part of Native Americans to integrate and to learn the customs, behaviors and habits of Europeans, displeasure fomented as early as the 1820's when certain states in the South Eastern portion of the country decided to forgo federal regulations that provided for land in these areas for Indians, and to have them removed.

In 1830, congress passed The Indian Removal Act, which became a law 2 days later by President Andrew Jackson. The law was to reach a fairly, voluntarily, and peacefully agreement for the Indians to move. It didn’t permit the president to persuade them unwillingly to give up their land by using force. But, “President Jackson and his government