preview

Indian Removal Dbq Essay

Decent Essays

During the presidency of Andrew Jackson, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The proponents of removal including President Jackson believed it was in the best interest of the native people to be relocated west of the Mississippi. The debate for Indian removal included several arguments to justify the government’s actions. Jackson outlined several reasons for Indian removal in his message to Congress in 1830. He stated, “by opening the whole territory between Tennessee on the north and Louisiana on the south to the settlement of the whites it will incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier” (Jackson). He believed the Indians were impeding westward progress by occupying land that should be settled by whites. Jackson also believed …show more content…

He contended the Indian populations “have gradually decreased since they became first known to the Europeans” (Cass). He felt they lacked the skill to be able to produce food as the animal populations had diminished. They would not continue to prosper in their current situation. Cass continues by questioning the Indians right to wander the lands as hunters and feels they would be better served by removal to west of the Mississippi. He stated the Indians would have more resources to “afford the emigrant Indian all the necessary instructions in the arts of life and duties of religion” (Cass). He also says the Indians will get “comfortable support, after their arrival in the land of refuge and until they can accommodate themselves to their circumstance” (Cass). Similar to Jackson’s statements Cass believes it is in the best interest of the Indians to be relocated for their safety and survival. Both men seemed to be forcing the issues of Indian removal to gain access to the lands they see as desirable. The proponents of Indian removal tried to make the situation a moral and just decision when they knew it was for gains of the white

Get Access