Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

Although there have been significant medical breakthroughs based in animal testing and experimentation, animal testing is a poor method of science as it is largely useless and

Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefits. However, what many people tend to forget are the millions of animals that are tortured or killed during the process of these painful, deadly experiments. Many people seem to misunderstand animal nature and the laboratory procedures and techniques that are executed on the animals. The procedures are cruel, unreliable, and harmful. Luckily there are more humane alternatives that have also proved to be less expensive.

According to Professor Paul Furlong, “the anatomic, metabolic, and cellular between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings (Animal Testing - ProCon.org). This means that even though animals and humans are very similar, they are also very different. They have different cells that react to different chemicals and release different hormones than what it does to humans. Their bodies react differently to different tests. Maybe the company tests the product on a “dud” animal, and the product ends up killing the animal. And what if the animal dies later and the company thinks that the product is safe to put on the shelf? What if the product gets put on the shelf and ends up harming a bunch of people? Then the company will most likely get sued and they will probably go out of business. Which leads me to me second point is that even though a drug passes the animal test, doesn’t exactly mean that it’s safe for humans to use. In the 1950’s, there was this sleeping pill that basically killed 100,000 babies because the pill was tested on animals prior

Peta is bad, your opinion is wrong, and the animals should die for science. Hold on, give me a sec,* clears throat* angry mob, put the torches and the pitchforks down, it's a joke. Clickbait and controversy aside, back in the space race animal testing was completely necessary. Many people disagree with this topic, and that's ok. Now that the angry mob has settled down a bit, let me tell you why animal testing was necessary during the space race. “Was the testing even necessary? Is winning the space race even important? And how will this help us as a nation?” Most people didn’t and still don’t think of these questions. They think, “NASA, the smartest and most responsible people on our planet are killing animals for science? Not on my

Every day, companies are caging animals just to test shampoo or cosmetics, and animals are getting abused every second. That is why we need to take action so we can make wildlife free from this tyranny of danger. We cannot let the persecution of animals keep happening again and again. Companies need to find a better substitution instead of animals. For the companies out there, you make think your product is working but your system for testing it, it’s not. There are more tortured animals than you think. According to Humane Society International, “animals used in horrific experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, taking pills, fasting on food or water, long periods of physical restraint, burns and other wounds to study the healing processes, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, neck-breaking, head chopping, or other means.” “This is cruel and inhumane, our country is supposed to be caring no matter if you're human or not. This is disgusting.” a local family in Minnesota responded. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported in 2010 that “97,123 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief, including 1,395 primates, 5,996 rabbits,

Imagine just waking up one day being stripped of your home, children, food and everything you own. You’re in the dark and all of a sudden these bright, intense, fluorescent lights flick on. A very large, unfamiliar looking menacing figure approaches you and prods you with needles and all sorts of drugs. Your barely fed and you're stuck here for the rest of your life. Now what if I told you that already happens today in the year 2017. These “people” i'm talking about are poor defenseless animals that have to go through these horrible conditions every day just for an experiment that might not even work. All animal testing should be banned, even if such testings would save human lives because, the process is painful, you’re endangering a species and haven't all cruel despicable nations tested on not only humans but also animals.

Dogs, cats, guinea pigs, and rabbits. What do they have in common? Maybe that they could all be common house pets, but it could also be that they are some of the animals that are commonly tested on for biomedical purposes as stated by the Humane Society. In the topic of using animals for biomedical research there are two definitive sides. Those opposed to animal testing state that it is unacceptable and unnecessary due to the fact that it only leads to the torture and death of millions of animals. Those supporting this animal testing believe that it is a key benefactor to advances in the medicinal industry. Animal testing is the necessary evil that helps further society’s knowledge in the biomedical field.

Do you think about what happens to the animals in laboratories that are being tested on? Would you want to have an ear on your back or be trapped to a table still alive, but are getting cut into without anesthesia? Would you like to be forcibly killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck breaking, decapitation and other horrible acts? I know you wouldn’t want to go through pain and suffering so why should the animals have to do it. Which side are you on, the people that says it is animal suffering or the side that says it is experimentation that uses animals to benefit humans?

There is nothing that angers me more, than people working in companies, factories, laboratories, and even in the comfort of their home to use innocent animals to test human products. They continue to test out these products on animals, even after it has been proven that in almost all cases, animal testing has no benefit on us as buyers or consumers. I have found that laboratories are using many animals that are considered as pets to families, such as mice and rats, rabbits, and even guinea pigs. They are forcefully using them to test out medical advancements, makeup products, perfumes, sanitation products, and even cleaning products, this all should be illegal. With enough awareness and a lot of support around the world, we can stop the

Animal testing, also known as animal experiments and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals for experimentation. It is estimated that between 100 – 150 million vertebrate animals, including mice, rats, birds, fish, rabbits, guinea pigs, farm animals, dogs, cats and non-human primates, are used in animal testing annually worldwide. This staggering number does not reflect the millions of vertebrates in the United States that are excluded from the Animal Welfare Act (AWA)*, and therefore not required to be reported. Additionally, between 50 – 100 million invertebrate animals are used in animal experiments annually.

However, researchers argue that because there are no laboratory alternatives that can replicate the complex biology of human beings, testing on living organisms is necessary (Animal Experimentation). Advances in technology may mean that this is no longer true. Funded by PETA, new methods such as Vitro, tests that use human cells and tissues, Silico models, and advanced computer-modeling techniques are being developed to replace animal testing (PETA). Unhindered by the many differences in species, “These models can accurately predict the ways that new drugs will react in the human body and replace the use of animals in exploratory research and many standard drug tests” (PETA). These technological advances in research make it no longer necessary or desirable to conduct expensive and time consuming experiments on animals whose results are inapplicable to humans

Over the years, scientists have found much more effective alternatives to animal experimentation which provides more accurate results. For example, Harvard's Wyss Institute invented a device which contained human cells that copied the human organs and organ system. This chip is called “organs-on-chips” and it provides a replica of, “ human physiology, diseases, and drug responses more accurately than crude animal experiments do ”(peta). By using these “organs-on-chips”, scientists could produce more benefiting medicines and release studies which would prove to be more successful than animal

Animal testing is inhuman. Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process. Rabbits have their eyes held open for the Draize eye test which is used to test shampoo the rabbits they test on can’t blink away the products in the testing. Animals are different from humans making them poor test subjects. The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings.In the 1950s a sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities, was tested on animals prior to its commercial release.Animal testing is cruel and isn’t needed because animals are different from people and some tests prove they don’t really

Animal experimentation is a thing of the past as there are numerous alternatives to animal testing. Many scientists have developed new methods to test the toxicity of a chemical. Sticking to the unethical and inaccurate method of animal testing is illogical. In-vitro testing, also called test-tube testing, computerised modelling and stem-cell experimentation are three

Observation and experimentation are how we as humans have been able to learn more about ourselves and the world and universe we live in. One of the most common methods of experimentation is animal testing. However, there are controversies surrounding animal testing. There are some that believe animal testing to be cruel and overdone, advocating for the eradication of the practice and further reliance alternative research methods. Groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and other animal rights advocates fall in this category. There are some that believe animal testing to be an invaluable resource and should continue, such as some scientists and research groups. However, there appears to me to be a consensus that is closer to the middle: the belief and understanding that while there are benefits to animal testing, there are flaws in the practice and there should be changes to increase its efficacy while we simultaneously explore alternate testing methods. Many scientists and the National Institute of Health (NIH) subscribe to this idea. I aim to explore the benefits, problems, and implications of animal testing in order to reach a more informed conclusion about a position that is most validated by the information I have used.