Are College Athletes Really Worth Paying? This Question

College sports are a phenomenon that keeps viewers coming back for more. Stated in an article on Money Nation the NCAA makes an estimated $1 billion per year and this number is still growing. What really is insane is that all that money is made off of college athletes, who don’t get a penny from that total number. The debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid has been around for decades and probably will still be here for years to come. Paying college athletes would make the teams unfair, change how hard players will work to get better, affect the amateurism of college sports, and lastly influence the athlete's willingness to participate in college sports.

The hot topic in amateur sports has been as to whether or not college athletes should be paid. The NCAA amateur rule states that an athlete in college sports cannot be paid other than their athletic scholarship. These athletes spend a tremendous amount of time at school practice and then working on schoolwork after practice. The NCAA is an organization that oversees all of the athletes that make up the basic unit of intercollegiate sports. The success of the NCAA whether it’s through the sale of merchandise, game day revenue or NCAA tournaments that each individual sports has, despite the absolute success of these tournaments these athletes receive any monetary compensation .Some of the main reasons why the NCAA lack of payments are that it wants to maintain its amateur status and

Collegiate sports have turned into a billion dollar industry and are probably just as popular, if not more popular than professional sports. College athletes put their bodies on the line to play a sport they love, many with hopes and dreams to one day make it to the professional leagues. Athletic facilities are the major money makers for all universities. Colleges bring in billions of dollars in revenue annually, yet athletes do not get paid. Some fans believe athletes should not get paid due to their sports level being “amateurish.”; however, this is far from the truth. There is much more to being a college athlete than just practicing and playing games. These student-athletes must practice, weight lift, go to meetings, travel, go to tutoring and study groups, all the while maintaining sufficient grades. This is very tedious work and is very time consuming. College athletes have a high standard to live up to (Frederick Web; Huma Web; Patterson Web ).

College athletes are taken advantage of and deserve to be compensated for their services while playing sports. These students are exploited and used to make money and out of everything that particular school makes, the athlete never given a penny of it. All of the hard works, blood, sweat and tears that they put into that

College sports are one of the largest and fastest growing markets in today’s culture. With some college sports games attracting more viewers than their professional counterparts, the NCAA is one of the most profiting organizations in America. Recently there has been controversy in the world of college sports as to whether the college athletes that are making their universities and the NCAA money should receive payment while they are playing their respective sport. Many believe that these athletes should be paid. Others argue that they are already receiving numerous benefits for playing that sport from their universities. Many of the proponents of paying college athletes are current or former college athletes who believe their hard work and hours put into practice and competing go under appreciated. They feel that while the athletes are making the university money, the athletes do not receive any cut of these profits. Opponents feel that athletes already receive numerous perks and should not receive extra compensation on top of the perks they already receive.

college football player? Or do you have a future as a college athlete but is not familiar with the life style, time planning, and financial support ? Surveys show that college athletes have around the range of 3 hours of free time and are not provided any money. This shows that students rarely have any time and are left with no money. So as common sense would have most people wondering, “Why would they not just get a job to help take care of themselves?” Well student athletes are not allowed to have personal jobs, which supports the opinion of several thousand athletes that they should be provided with a certain amount of money every month due to personal needs, along with the payment of their tuition.This allowance can also help for food, clothing, and even personal items.

Do you want to get paid for playing a sport in college? (http://www.experienceproject.com/question-answer.php) College players should receive some payment for playing for their schools. College athletes put their bodies on the line each game they play, paying college athletes would help to begin creating a sense of financial awareness, (https://smartasset.com/retirement/should-student-athletes-be-paid ) and some athletes don't have enough money to pay for food or stuff they need and with the money they have left over they can buy things.

So the question arose again, should we pay college athletes? According to research done by the National College Players Association, “If allowed access to the fair market like the pros, the average FBS football and basketball player would be worth approximately $121,048 and $265,027 respectively (not counting individual

Should college athletes be paid? Let’s take a quick glance at the pros and cons of each perspective. For starters, in my opinion, yes, college athletes should get paid. What deserves debate, is the conversation of how to get this done. From my experience, in America, you get paid in proportion to the value you bring to the marketplace. College sports is one, if not the

The idea of paying college athletes to compete is not new, unlike most people think. This debate has been around since the 1800’s. The college sports industry makes about $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Nationally in 2010-11, the top 15 college basketball programs generated roughly $293 million, less than a third of what the top 15 football programs generated, baseball makes very little money compare to basketball and football according to Jeffrey Dorfman. These revenues are coming from multiple sources, such as ticket sales, sponsorship, and broadcasting rights. The National Collegiate Athletic Association recently sold broadcast rights to its annual men 's basketball tournament for upwards of $770 million per season. At the University of Alabama, the head football coach, Nick Saban, recently signed a contract paying him $7 million per year; more than 91 times the average wage of an Orange County public school teacher. However, the facts I have mentioned so far concerns football only. Football and basketball are the biggest sources of athletic revenues in the majority of universities. So with all this money involved, should student athletes get a percentage of the revenue their sport brings to the university?

First, some say that college athletes should be paid because of the fact that the schools and the NCAA make billions. In an article from USA Today, it stated: “NCAA made more than $1 billion for the year” (Mama). On the other hand, they should not be paid because tons of the athletes get scholarships, they are rewarded with a free education, and they are technically getting around twenty-thousand dollars a year. First, in an article from Scholorshipstats.com in statistics from 2015 regarding the amount of scholarship money that was given out was nearly 2.2 billion dollars.

“A partner from the St Louis - based firm Bryan Cave says that athletes go to college to get a degree. Some just end up playing sports.” (Cooper et al.1). Many people tend to think that college is all about sports. Attending college is a privilege. (Cooper et al.1) there fore, athletes are already being rewarded by attending college.

Should college athletes have the right to get paid? The debate has been going on for a while, even more so in the past few years. Many different sports experts and reporters have put in their opinion and there are many different ideas out there. There are numerous ideas of why or why not, and countless different ways that have been suggested. A lot of big name school such as University of Miami and University of Ohio to name a few have been in the news lately for all the discipline they have been getting for a variety of problems all of which coming from money. Although it has been a constant problem and constant discussion forever in college sports, it’s becoming more and more apparent over time. People come from different backgrounds and

Supporters express the amount of pressure put on college athletes consistently. Since they’re “top notch” athletes they are held to an extremely high standard and feel a chip on their shoulder to perform on a high level, night in and night out. Between practices, film, workouts, and meetings, supporters believe that a college athlete's daily schedule is very similar to one of a real employee's schedule; the only difference is that employees are being paid. Through all these responsibilities of college athletes “There are similarities to it being a job. There is a time allotment expected of you.” (Cooper 13). College athletes have many duties and responsibilities they have to complete during their career. What makes the tasks even harder is that they have to do school work as well, which supporters feel is as difficult as an actual job. Their is a big “business” aspect of college athletics too and at times supporters express how the NCAA is making money from the kids who just want to play sports. The NCAA seems to be “ trying to reconcile a multibillion-dollar industry while claiming it is really an amateur activity. That it is a huge moneymaking industry is beyond dispute." (Cooper 13). There is no question that the NCAA easily has enough money to pay college athletes, it’s just a matter of them actually realizing their workload and responsibilities they have to deal with on a daily

People believe college athletes should get paid as if it were a job, although this will create issues between rich and poor schools (Griffin 18). The rich colleges will have the opportunity to obtain the best athletes, causing the poor schools to not be as competitive. This issue makes the sports less competitive and entertaining, making fans less interested (Griffin 18). Since football and basketball bring in the most money, other college sports will not be able to be funded due to drawing in number one players in football and basketball (Griffin 18). Most popular sports are men’s sports, therefore creating less money that would be paid to women. Since most of the profit comes from men’s football and basketball, womens’ sports could become eliminated if the male athletes had a higher salary. The National Collegiate Athletic Association does not believe athletes are employees because under the law, playing a sport should not make them feel as if they are an employee (Cooper 12). Many student-athletes are privileged to have the opportunity to have their education provided, while continuing to receive special treatment for being an athlete (Cooper 12). While some believe athletes should not be paid for their time, a couple of professors from Michigan State University believe the athletes are mentally and physically stressed (Cooper 12). Student- athletes, especially in