Argument Of An Open Source Visualisation Tool

The aim of this paper is to provide a brief description of the bundle payment initiative will be addressed in relationship to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Additional focuses will be placed on comparisons of the bundle strategy with traditional Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) payments. The purpose of the analysis is to implement and design a bundle payment program for community acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients utilizing the bundle program. The analysis will address health care providers and service vendors needed to successfully implement the program. Additionally, AONE nurse executive competencies will be discussed in relation to skills needed by nurse leaders in collaboration with the programs implementation.

The Stephen Toulmin was a British Philosopher who created a system of argumentation, called the Toulmin Model. The Toulmin Model breaks down an argument into six parts: claims (what I hope to prove), evidence (support), warrant (connection between “claims” and “evidence), backing (support for the warrant), rebuttal (potential objection to the claim), and qualifier (limits put on the claim). The first three parts are the most important. The Toulmin Model is an actual structure that can be used in any argument, from academic essays to commercial advertisement. It can also be used to analyze irrational situations.

I. Identify the conclusion of each argument by underlining it. Identify the premises in the order in which they make the most sense by writing a P1 in front of premise 1, a P2 in front of premise 2, and so on.

An argument is a disagreement between two or more individuals based on ones beliefs or opinions with the purpose of disproving the other person’s beliefs or opinion. There are four elements to make an argument legitimate, and then you have to present the evidence for that argument. Then there is the counterargument where you have to defend your claims followed by your rebuttal where you will have to show all of the evidence you have to disprove the other person argument that they have against yours. If you can present these elements it will show your level of research and intelligence about the subject that is in question.

The part of an argument have six point according to Toulmin model. The six point are the claim, support, backing, warrant, qualifier and rebuttal. The claim is what the writer is trying to say, basically the thesis statement. The support is the claim or evidence. The backing is like building a connection to the reader’ opinion. The rebuttal create what is wrong about the argument and represent the different point of view. Lastly the qualifier are word used in the argument like always, never, might, all, never change to sometimes and etc.

According to the definition given by google, the term symbol is defined as “a thing that represents” (Google.com). Laura Esquivel, author of Like Water for Chocolate incorporates symbols to give her novel an in depth meaning for her characters rather than the glass mirror told upon each page. Esquivel uses symbolic morals of self guidance to seek the inner flame in every individual in society, Biblical reference such as the comparison between Tita and The Virgin Mary, and imagery from the premonition Tita had of her “White Wedding” (Billy Idol). These symbolic references create a living novel in the worlds between fantasy and reality.

In this article titled “Analyzing Arguments: Those You Read and Those You Write” goes over multiple strategies and examples to help you analyze the meaning and purpose of a specific argument and how to strengthen your own.

4). What are some of the conditions necessary for argument to work best? To work best, a productive and potentially successful argument, whether presented in writing, in speech, or in images, require the following elements: An Issue, An Arguer, Audience, Common Ground and A Forum.

This information can be used by students to help them organize an argumentative research paper. In addition, both student and instructors can utilize the information as a resource guide.

Introduce the first main point of the argument. Then, provide evidence from the sources. Multiple pieces of evidence should be provided to support the main point.

Create an argument map based on the influence diagram presented in Include in the map as many warrants, backings, objections, and rebuttals as possible.

Arguments are apart of everyday life. We encounter them every day: at home, at work, while watching tv, driving, even listening to the radio. I am not saying we regularly encounter shouting matches, in fact arguing is a communication tool many of us use every day to problem solve. The true nature of arguments is described best by Ramage et al “…argument does not imply anger. In fact, arguing is often pleasurable. It is a creative and productive activity that engages us at high levels of inquiry and critical thinking…” (2). Arguments, at their core, are much more than our initial assumption. An argument can be described as anything that attempts to solve a conflict, that involves at least two conflicting assertions, by appealing to reason. These

An argument is an attempt to prove that something is true (or probably true) by offering evidence. In philosophy there are usually three premises that are part of the argument. Premises are evidence used to attempt to prove the conclusion. The third premise is the one that sums up that argument. Arguments can be objectively true or subjectively true. For an argument, x is objectively true if and only if x is the case, and x is subjectively true for S if and only if x coheres with S’s worldview of X is simply a matter of taste.

Just as generals must marshal or gather their troops, argumentative writers must marshal their evidence. Revisit your notes, graphic organizers, and worksheets from the play. Write key points of evidence in the chart below. Then, decide what claim you will make.

Gender and technology has become a very important factor within today’s society, as it reflects upon the overlaps between gender, digital technologies and democracy. Technology has presented both genders in provocative ways that tends to lead to sexual harassment and then for political action to end gender based violence. This then becomes essential and fundamental to the working of and towards a healthy democracy. The term Cyberfeminism has been developed throughout the previous years as feminists who are interested in exploiting with technologies, such as the Internet and cyber-space think it is a vehicle of freedom from the dissolution of sex and gender. An example of online digital media that illustrates the case of gender of Cyberfeminism is the online media campaign called “Free The Nipple.” This essay will firstly describe this cyberfeminism campaign and how it is relevant towards gender and technology. Then it will examine how digital media can be used as a form of resistance against stereotypes and ideological assumptions in relation to the role of women in contemporary society. Thus the difference between men and women become relevant to these media phenomena and is of importance for gender patterns when considering it in relation to the Internet. (Bimber, 3)