Francisco Gutierrez Sep/28/16
Katz
Composition 101
Is our government fair in our current age, do they carry justice rightfully or do they have their own agenda. They have being cases where they have wrongfully have sentence people to server sentences more than 20 years. That 20 years of your life that you can’t never get back you’re forever a criminal. They give you compensation for those lost years. That not going to fix the years you miss like noting is it even wroth going back to that world. To a world that you’re no longer part of a world that have shun you from society.
Most of the popularity today are behind bars and have some being down the wrong path or have being wrong fully put there. The decision they have made in their life have cost them their freedom but they have lost more than their freedom they lost their humanity. Our justice system today have made many mistake in the years. A people have being process by the system have being label as just a faulty product. “Most people who are released from prison return within a few years… mere survival on the outside are so immense” (Alexander pg3, p3). So the government doesn’t
…show more content…
Well that’s through fear of course. People that need protection are the one that are afraid. The government takes that fear and use it against you by making you be afraid of everything around you. When people are that burnable they become easy to control. When people see someone who can protect them , they will support them till then end as long as that person keeps supposedly protecting them “Hiring staff whose job it was to publicize … crack-related violence” (Alexander, pg2 ,p3). When you hear about crime happening around, you become afraid of your surrounding but what if someone said we goanna improve the security in your area would you support
When we think about prisons, jails, and courthouses, our minds are meant to draw a connection to cold, hard, justice and fair punishments for guilty and deserving parties. Yet, in our judicial and prison systems around the world, this idea is nowhere close to reality. From inhumane punishments, to mass incarceration, and “trapping” people in the system based on race or financial status, justice is far from being served.
Mass Incarceration is a predicament in the U.S. because in the land of the free, there are more than two million people in prison. Prisons are homes to the majority of twenty-two percent of the U.S. population. The U.S. has a massive incarceration rate, seven hundred and sixteen per every one hundred thousand. The U.S. makes five percent of the world’s population and the third country in which most people live in but number one incarcerating humans.
There are many offenders within the criminal justice system, the political economy of the prison crisis in America has
The United States criminal justice system is not working. We throw the criminals into the system and forget about them. There is little to no effort to reintegrate them into society. “According to a report from HM Inspectorate
While the United States’ justice system has been a model for many countries around the world, the injustice of certain aspects in our court’s system is prominent. Mandatory minimums are just one example the of injustice in our justice system. The Supreme Court has “…casted doubt on the constitutionality of the federal sentencing guidelines used for nearly two decades” (Kenneth Jost, 2004), despite this, nothing has been done to correct it. And while the idea of mandatory minimums is a good thing, they don’t work in the American justice system or in current American society.
Once upon a time, Americans could proudly say that America was the land of freedom and opportunity. As the Pledge of Allegiance states, “One nation under God, Indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” However, under the current criminal justice system, more and more people lose their liberties because of the crimes they have committed. According to Roy Walmsley, a consultant of the United Nations and Associate of the International Center for prison studies, “In October 2013, the incarceration rate of the United States of America was the highest in the world, at 716 per 100,000 of the national population. While the United States represent about 4.4 percent of the world 's population, it houses around 22 percent of the world 's prisoners.” These people are not only prisoners, but they are also parents, sons, and daughters - the loved ones of families. The number of people that have been incarcerated also represents the number of families that have been shattered.
them the correction system, and mass incoeration will not serve any good to our nation. Also all that mass incoercation is leading to is to increase of private prison
Many people in jail are waiting for justice. Having to sit in a jail cell doing time for something you didn't do and having to wait for an appeal that's not going to happen can be rough. There's has to be a change in the sentencing reform. First of all , prison is getting overpopulated. According to source 1 " Imprisonment destroys employment prospects and family ties. This shows how sentencing reform can affect peoples lives because most american lives are Fathers and Mothers trying to support for their families are stuck in prison waiting for an appeal and to beat the trial to get back to supporting their families. Eventually, the more people you put in prison the badder it gets. In source 1 line 5-7" After 45,000 criminals were placed in
The United States prison system incarcerates more people per capita than nearly all European countries, and roughly two-thirds of those inmates that are released will be arrested again within three years (Ward et al, 2015). Some facilities have relatively successful programs that cut down on the recidivism numbers. However, the majority of prisons are focused on punishment and make no efforts at rehabilitation. Something in the American justice systems needs to change so that the cycle can be broken. To accomplish this, we can look at the justice system of other countries and try to determine whether such systems would work in the United States.
In America, the justice system is flawed and biased in most cases. Many cases are overlooked and have exaggerated sentences that sets a person’s fate in stone. In the documentary, Time: The Kalief Browder Story, Kalief Browder was wrongfully put in Riker’s Island Jail for three years. He endured beatings, starvation and torture without ever being convicted of a crime. He spent most of his time in solitary confinement and it drove him to the brink of insanity. His whole life changed the night he got arrested for supposedly stealing a man’s backpack. Without having the funds for bail, Kalief stayed in one of the most violent prisons in the country and it affected him immensely. He was paranoid and did not trust anyone around him because he thought they were the police. No matter what he did to try and work through the suffering, he still ended up in a psychiatric hospital on a couple occasions after his release. And because of the effects, he committed suicide at his mom’s home only a few years after he was released from prison. The justice system is fatally flawed and needs to be revised for the fact that Kalief’s story is not so unusual. Although the justice system was made to protect the innocent and reform the guilty, it failed to provide justice.
Oftentimes, the definition of social justice can be misinterpreted or misunderstood. The true definition of social justice is often structured by governmental implications but is the fair and proper administration of laws to each individual conforming to the natural law. Equality is supposed to be equally distributed amongst individuals nationally, but can sometimes be taken advantage of and be taken away from people who deserve it the most. Generally, those who view social justices as a right, also value people above profits.
I think that a government is fair in creating the laws for us ,Because he is not a tyrant and he should not be. All is equal under the eyes of god according to the declaration of the independence.It states in the title of the independence that we the people and then it says all men are created equally.
Over the past generation, the landscape of sentencing prisoners has changed dramatically. Over this same period, United States of America has made a number of modifications in one of the basis of American criminal justice policy, Prison Term. Prison Terms has taken the place of public flogging, death penalty and torture. Stastics has shows that many states has abolished death penalty. Today in order to deter the crime, Nowadays, only few states in the United States of America such as Texas, practices Death Penalty. Nevertheless, many fierce criminals are sentenced for a long prison term; in order to ensure public safety. In a response to fight against crime, there is an increase in the use of imprisonment. Conversely, many state legislatures have reduced prison term, discharging more prisoners (directly to the society) in order to maintain the prison management. A statistics of released prisoners over the decade/
Government! You can't live with it! You can't live without it! It is the "common cold" that everyone dreads. The American Heritage College Dictionary, Third Edition defines government as, "The exercise of authority in a political unit in order to control and administer public policy." Webster's Desk Dictionary of the English Language defines government as, "The political direction and control exercised over a nation, state, community, etc." The common individual might define government as the root of all evil. The thing about government is that no one stops to think about how government came about.
In the context of this argument, discrimination is the unjust treatment of groups of people, specific in this argument, women and racial minorities. Discrimination often involves unfair denial of opportunity to a woman or minority from a source of power. While discrimination is wrong, it is not all the same and it does not all come from the same source. Discrimination can stem from things like emotions, specifically fear or hatred, rules and laws, and society. To compare discrimination, you must be comparing situations with the same cause. Comparing discrimination with different causes does not work since they are not coming from the same foundation. Comparison needs the same foundation so similarity in the situations are taken into consideration. The cause is a big enough difference that makes the cases incomparable. In discrimination cases, a situation that began from fear will be vastly different than a situation that began from a law. The reasoning for discrimination and how to handle the problem will be different. These situations have to be dealt with separately and they should not be compared as they are not similar enough for comparison.