Argumentative Essay: Should Women Be In Combat?

Women now make up 14 percent of the active-duty military in the United States, which is up from 1.6 percent, 25 years prior. (Christian Science Monitor, 1). In 1948, President Truman signed the Women 's Armed Services Integration Act which created the role of women in the military. This law meant that each branch of the service was allowed to have one female Colonel (Byfield, 12). As of 2015, there are many women who serve as Generals and Admirals. All of these roles are non-combative. Even though some women can do anything a man can do, the vast majority can not, therefore making it an unsafe idea to place these women into combat positions.

Historically, military service and fighting in combat have only been available to men, but recently there has been debate about women serving in military combat. In times of war in the United States, men have generally fought as soldiers while women in the

Through the deaths and the injuries, through the explosions and gunfire, through the heartache and brokenness, women have been serving in the military one way or another. Since the beginning of time, women have been fighting for their rights. They fought for their right to work, they fought for their right to vote, and they fought for their right to be in the military. Beginning in the Revolutionary War, women were allowed to join the military as nurses and support staff. Since then, they have gradually been able to do more tasks and jobs that the men do. Today, the conflict is whether or not women should be allowed to fight in military combat. The argument is controversial, and will more than likely be a never-ending debate.

Women are very skilled at these jobs, and help the country in many ways that we can’t imagine. But the one thing that is stirring up arguments across the country, is should women in the U.S. military engage in combat? Women across the country argue that women should be given the equal rights and opportunities in the military and in combat situations. Although many

Over the years the United States has grown to love each other as the way people are, especially women. Women have proven to be even stronger than what people expected them to be. You can see the strength, the courage, and the confidence they have gained. It has been discussed many years that women shouldn’t be allowed in combat for not being “strong enough”. Men have shown that they can be “manly” enough to do women or girl things, so why can’t women do “manly” things? If women feel like they can handle being on the frontline then we should respect their decision and allow them to go.

Although women should be fighting in front line in the military many believe they should not. More than 200,000 position will still be remain exclusive to men. women won 't be able to qualify for jobs. “They are not going to be able to meet those standards” (Women in the Military: Why Can 't We Serve on the Front Lines). The weapon use in the front line are too dangerous. “women will not be able to handle the big

Some argue that women should not serve in combat because; they have never served in any type of combat operations in the history of the American military. Positions in the military have been designed specifically for women and how they perform their duties. No evidence can be produced that women have the abilities, physical strength, or motivation to engage in combat operations, the physical differences from their male counterparts are so extreme; women cannot maintain the agility or psychological confidence that men are capable of displaying during extreme combat stress.

Women are no different than men. I mean sure men are way bigger and stronger but I’ve seen women that are also very strong. Women were put in war just to be nurses. Women couldn’t even be a doctor because people said it was a man’s job. Critics say women possess physical and biological handicaps that will damage the cohesion of combat units. If they were put in combat. Women are still being treated unfairly. Women should be treated equally. Quote “Since the U.S. military has begun integrating women into combat positions; it hasn't lowered its training standards or made any concessions (“EDITORIAL: Women Have . Right to Fight for Freedom”). The changes made even to let women fight in the military services happened in the late 1990-1991. The critics said it may take two women to do the same job as one man on the battlefield. Quote “A woman may lack the strength to carry a wounded soldier out of harm's way.” ("Introduction to Women in the Military :”). Women are not all the

Women are already fighting "shoulder-to-shoulder" with males in the U.S. military, according to Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (McAuliff, 2012). In fact about 144 women have died "in action" in Afghanistan and Iraq, McAuliff's article explains. About 900 women have been wounded in battle, but currently there is no "formal

The topic of women in combat is an ongoing debate that is currently being argued in many places, commonly in the United States. Women in combat next to men and a free women combat are two different perspectives in which women in combat are defined by their gender. Women in combat will provide help to those men who are to attend a combat. A free-women combat, on the other hand, prevents women from dying during combat due to not being allowed in combat. Since Women aren’t able to be included in any job in the military and have a right to be equally treated like men in combat, it’ll be unfair to more people. Women should be given the same right as men out in battlefields because “women serving in the armed forces has not wavered as warfare has changed, a clear sign that the necessity of women serving in combat is recognized.” In addition, “several other countries outside the U.S. already have women serving on the front lines.” Lastly, “Combat is nothing new to our women in the military. Several women have already given their lives serving in combat.” Women have, over the years, worked hard to get awarded the choice towards their career. Although it prevents more deaths, it’s also a sexist matter. Any job in the military should be a choice for women, it’s their career after all and they can make their own decisions.

All combat roles are open and available to women, should the men be worried? Whether I agree or disagree with women participating in combat depends on their skill set. One of the main concerns would be how do they react under certain life and death situations. After enough practice, most people will be able to handle a weapon and shoot at a paper target. The question only really gets answered when you are in live combat. Yes, the military practices live combat situations, but that is without live rounds so in a sense you understand that you are protected from danger. What will she do when her comrades are dying all around her? Can she handle trying to deal with friends losing limbs? I think a huge concern of some of the men on the front

Women just aren’t built for the job of frontline combat. Infantrymen have to carry an estimated 100 pounds on their back. At the same time they have to load 90 pound shells into guns that are nearly double the size of that ammunition. This is one of the reasons that women can not handle the stress of frontline combat. Men are built more for the conditions of combat with their broader shoulders and backs, and thicker necks. Women have 45 to 50 percent less upper-body strength, and 25 to 30 percent less aerobic capability. Also men are born with more testosterone in their body. Testosterone enhances the body’s ability to build muscle, which also makes men more built and made for the physical toll of combat.

Women should be integrated into combat positions such as infantry, artillery, and Special Forces. If a woman chooses this kind of challenge, then she is more than capable. Women are as tough as men. They can do what a man can do, and if that is going into combat then yes, why not? Women can fight, shoot, run, work hard, and win for this country like the men of this country do. Women have been in combat for a long time, but now women are actually in combat rather than helping the men out with injuries, being a laundresses, a cook, and a nurse. Women can go into combat, just like a man.

     Emotionally and mentally, women are less fit for combat. Women share their feelings more than men, and are effected by many different things. Seeing a friend shot and killed would devastate both a man and a woman, but a man is more likely to stay with his platoon and get the job done. Women, for the most part, are more independent thinkers when it comes to military; men are better at taking orders. What would seem like a suicide mission could be the turning point in a battle. Men would most likely follow the orders, while the women would think about it and be hesitant. Men also take more risks than women, this is proved by car insurance rates. A man is much better mentally and emotionally fit for combat

I am in favor of equality for women, just not when it comes to women in combat. There have been women in society doing heroic things since the Revolutionary war. There have been brave women in war posing as men so they could fight. There are a select few women who could handle war and combat. The negative aspects of women in combat outweigh the positive. Women should not participate in military combat. However they may join the military and served in traditional roles such as nurses and office staff. The difference between men and women is women are physically weaker, they have vital personal needs, and they attract male troops.