In fact, the clean power plan would cut the pollution at least thirty percent by the end of the next decade (Climate Change/ The White House). By giving the states option to replace dirty coal plants with wind, solar and energy efficiency, it also has the potential to speed the shift to clean power. President Obama’s administration has made real progress in developing a wide range of initiatives that reduce greenhouse gas emissions through clean energy policies (Climate Change/ The White House). Since President Obama took office, the U.S. has increased solar electricity generation by more than ten-fold, and tripled electricity production from wind power. Building on the improvements of the first term, America continue to take new and comprehensive …show more content…
Government is on track to meet the clean energy goals that is to install 100 megawatts of renewable capacity across federally subsidized housing by 2020, permit 10 gigawatts of renewable projects on public lands by 2020, deploy 3 gigawatts of renewable energy on military installations by 2025, and double wind and solar electricity generation in the United States — once again — by 2025 (FACT …show more content…
Eventually it will create more problems and we will have bigger issues. While we can't change our energy resources in one day, we can start making a change individually and make less damage to the world. Considering all, a big threat is facing us in the form of global warming. Into the bargain, forestation can be the greatest help in this regard. Secondly, the minimum one can do is to follow the environmental policy of Three Rs’-‘Reduce, Reuse, Recycle’, promoting the reuse of anything. The future of earth's climate is in the hands of humans. With simple measures we, as inhabitants of this planet, cannot seal our fortune in rising temperatures. We have to stop thinking of the natural world as something that we can exploit, and start thinking of it as something that is crucial to our very existence. We must take responsibility for our home. We have one chance to save the one
Next, if we build a clean energy economy, investing in more industries that help to be efficient for example: solar panels, the use of less paper, more electric trains. Solar panels, are a great source of power, if you install one small panel
His administration insists that with these new rules going into an effect will cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other deadly gases by thirty percent between the years 2012-2016 (Baker,2010). Unfortunately Obama’s new policy will only help conserve for the next six years. The following resource plan will not only help do the same but will hopefully have the same if not better results even farther into the future.
At the beginning of last year, I convinced my family to start using environmentally products, focusing on green technology. In order to apply environmental technology properly and effectively, I had to figure out what alternative forms of energy existed and how well they worked. This led to my questioning: what other forms of energy could the United States be pursuing to increase its production of electricity? In an effort to research different form of energy and their benefits and detriments, I read two articles: “A Letter to the Editor” by David Rockwood and “Why Uranium is the New Green” by William Sweet. In his letter, David Rockwood, a professional engineer, discusses the several inaccuracies and possible ramifications of wind power as a main source of electricity. Rockwood claims that wind power is unreliable because of flaws in its system and design, not to mention the detrimental environmental impact. Similarly, in his article William Sweet, a college graduate, talks about different ways to impose some kind of carbon regulation. Sweet compares nuclear and wind power to coal-burning power, remarking that nuclear and wind power technologies can make an immediate beneficial difference on greenhouse gas emissions. Despite the fact that Rockwood goes in depth on only wind power while Sweet talks about multiple sources of power, both of the articles made me think that the United States should pursue some other form of energy to increase its production of electricity.
Why did so many colonists perish during “the starving time”? There are many theories, possibilities, and clues. But my theory is the lack of resources and preparation. According to the documents in the detective logs jamestown when into the time of suffering because the stupidity of the colonists leaders spending little time farming. Food supplies dwindled. Malaria and the harsh winter killed 440 of the 500 people in the jamestown colony's. The colonists did not get any support from the wealthy which caused in the end left only 60 people alive. The last point would be the powhatan massacre “The Powhatan Confederacy came unarmed into our houses with deer, turkeys, fish, fruits, and other provisions to sell us. The Powhatan
Evidence: According to the Obama Administration, the United States has nearly doubled clean renewable energy generated by wind, solar, and geothermal since 2008.
Carbon emissions are changing the planet for the worse. Energy production (mostly coal) is producing a one third of the US 's global warming emissions. Renewable sources produce little to zero percent. The balance of coal and renewable energy in the U.S. needs to be evened out with renewable techniques. Statistics from the Union of Concerned Scientist’s “Benefits of Renewable Energy Use” show that most renewable resources emit less than one pound of CO2E/kWh. These have significantly less of a carbon footprint than coal, which emits 1.4 to 3.6 lbs. CO2E/kWh or natural gas, which emits .6 to 2 lbs. CO2E/kWh. This impressive difference of carbon emissions between renewable and fossil fuel is the key to caring for our environment. A 2009 USC study found that if 25 percent of the US 's
This article discusses the problems with switching to renewable energy. Obama's Clean Power Plan sets a goal for the United States to have 28% of its power come from renewable energy sources by the year 2030 and the two following problems came from it.
With our modern technology, yes, we can burn our coal within the limits of the Clean Air Act” (Reagan,1980) and Reagans lack of policy regarding the environment while pushing for increased coal production seem to mirror his skepticism regarding the environmental issues of the time. The partisan nature of environmental policy spending can be shown most clearly when Reagan’s nonchalant approach to the environmental policy when they are compared to the new technologies that were put in to place during the presidency of Jimmy Carter. In an address to a joint session of congress in 1977, Carter outlined a national energy plan which included “We must start now to develop the new, unconventional sources of energy we will rely on in the next century” (Carter, 1977) and this included “In the long term, to develop renewable and essentially inexhaustible sources of energy for sustained economic growth” (Carter, 1977). This brings a different perspective to the policy changes that are now occurring in the government in a change from President Obama to President Trump. Just as Reagan followed Carter and the shift on environmental policy was moved from developing new technologies to returning to coal burning as a primary source of energy, the change from Obama’s policies to Trump’s may not be totally
In 2013, the Obama Administration issued the Climate Action Plan to focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 17 % reduction below 2005 levels by 2020. This plan’s three objectives were carbon reduction, strengthening capacity for climate change response, and leading international cooperation for climate change crisis (White House, 2013). To reduce the
As the world population rises, we are using more and more energy and it is depleting faster than ever. Our fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) will not last forever and at some point we will have to switch over completely to renewable energy sources. While most of the world still uses non-renewable energy sources, the future will rely on renewable energy and its applications. Right now, over 90% of the world still uses fossil fuels and developing countries even burn wood to generate energy. At the rate we are using our fossil fuels, they will not last us far into the 22nd century. Additionally, big consumers of fossil fuels like China, U.S., Russia, and India are creating large amounts of pollution and it is only increasing. For instance, India has major issues with pollution because of heavy traffic (which releases more fuel emissions into the air), the burning of biomass (wood and other organic matter), and runoff into lakes and rivers. Right now, our biggest goal should be to figure out how to implement more forms of renewable energy in our own society. We should start using renewable energy in America because: it is more environmentally friendly, opens up the job market, and improves the health of the public.
Rigid beliefs and a lack of early opposition leads a person to become unaccepting of different ideology. By acknowledging divergent views, people become more tolerant towards the various ways something can be done. People often disregard or ignore opposition for fear of altering their unwavering beliefs. As a person stops questioning their beliefs they became less likely to tolerate others with conflicting ideas. Early knowledge of diverse ways leads to a higher probability in tolerance, and keeps one from narrow mindedness. Southern prejudice shows conformity to a system of beliefs for fear of change or different ways. In To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, Scout abandons typical Southern prejudice due to her tolerance, a trait fostered by
Can pride and ambition excuse senseless murder? Recently, Macbeth ascended to the top of the hierarchy in just a short period of time. I suspect that his latest success is the result of dishonest methods employed to secure the throne. Rumors verify that Macbeth hosted Duncan in his residence at his time of death, met with instruments of supernatural forces, and lost all sanity during his banquet. I speculate that Macbeth and his wife hatched a plan to murder King Duncan to gain the power for themselves. Macbeth is guilty, and at the very least unfit to rule, because of his questionable ascension rise to the throne, information regarding Duncan’s death, and his inability to maintain mental stability.
The United States is the second largest producer of greenhouse gases in the world, and yet is doing very little to fix this startling statistic (Dennis). The US’ reliance upon outdated energy sources continues to harm both the environment and the economy by producing millions of tonnes of pollution every year and costing the government billions of dollars (“Fact Sheet: Clean Power Plan”). Fossil fuels have been the main energy sources in America since the industrial revolution, and it is time to make a change. Renewable energy is energy harnessed from sources like the sun, wind, or water, and has little to no negative effects on the environment (“Renewable Energy Technology Basics”). The United States needs to integrate and increase the use of these types of energy across the country, as well as implement positive environmental policies, to prevent further pollution of the earth and combat the effects of climate change.
The world around us mostly runs on fossil fuels in order to produce electricity; however, there will be a period that comes where we will run out of those fossil fuels. We only have so much time before a crisis hits and we have nothing left to produce the energy we need. In order for our country to produce the energy and electricity we need, we must do something about it. As a country, we must figure out how we can make the switch to using more renewable energy before it is too late and we run out of fossil fuels.
For nearly everyone on earth, fossil fuels are a part of our daily lives. Some of the more obvious places to find petroleum products would be gas and diesel in cars and trucks, but it is in more than just your tank. Without fossil fuels, we would not have things such as plastic to make a wide variety of things such as tires, kayaks, or even computers. The question remains, do we need fossil fuels?