Argumentative Essay: The Right To Bear Arms

We need to own guns for self-defense or else the deaths of people will increase. Also, there are several recreational activities which require guns to be used. Sporting clays, target shooting, bowling pin shooting, and trap are four commonly activities which require firearms to be utilized. Banning guns would just spoil somebody’s hobby, which could be those recreations. A final reason is that crime is reduced according to a few reports. One in 1998 stated that the percent numbers for crimes decreased to low numbers. Another one talks about a commissioner not stating gun control for the solution to reduce crime. These three reasons eliminate the point of banning

How about hunter where would we be without them? Can you imagine not being able to go

Mass shootings occur often around a country that is the land of the free and seems to be safe. Universal background checks is a necessity. Too many assault weapons get into the hands of wrong people and the consequences are irreversible. One incident that happened in Connecticut is the Sandy Hook Elementary School. This is a prime example of how assualt weapons got into the hands of the wrong person. Adam Lanza was not the owner of these guns but he had access to them. With universal background checks the lives of 20 kids and 6 adults could have been protected.

My first reason why gun background checks should be longer and more thorough because the crime rate would be lowered. The crime rate would be lowered because people who have a bad record wouldn’t be able to buy a gun without a long process. Guncontrol.procon.org says,” Gun control laws help temporarily delay criminals with guns.” This proves my supporting argument because it delays someone's plan to commit a crime. The police can have an easier time determining who might commit a crime by using a gun. That was one of the reasons why gun background checks should be longer and more thorough because crime rate would be lower and another reason would be that it would reduce and prevent mass-shootings.

Nowadays purchasing firearms can be as easy as going to a gun show and buying a gun from there. Background checks are only required when making a purchase in a store. While this happens it makes

The main issue with background checks is a broken system it now operates under. The national instant criminal background check system has been in use since 1998 and to date has processed “160 million transactions of these almost one million were denied.” (National Instant Criminal Background Check System Operations 2012) While these numbers may sound promising we will explain later on why it has not had the desired effect. “As a result of the gun control act of 1968, certain people, such as convicted felons, immigration violators, sexual offenders and many others are prohibited from

Stricter gun control is essential as current gun control laws have loopholes that are used by individuals to acquire weapons without any sort of background checks. Those who wish to avoid checks often use loopholes such as the Brady bill loophole. This gun loophole has been described by a correspondent from CNN stating, “In 1986, the Firearms Owners' Protection Act opened the doors for licensed dealers to sell from their own "personal collections," without background checks, and the loophole became entrenched” (Mara, 2016, para. 4). These so-called, ‘licensed dealers’ do not inherently have to check for any form of ID or background check to deem a person able to handle a firearm. Surprisingly, private dealers are not even deemed liable

In firearm stores, background checks have prevented 3 million gun sales to prohibited consumers, according to Everytown for Gun Safety. Background checks could be the next solution for firearm purchases, if they were stricter and had more requirements.

When Background Checks are required, they are extremely effective at making sure that a gun does not end up in the wrong person’s hand. In addition to that, the background check system ahs to become more advanced by going deeper into the clients life being completely sure that the gun is going to good hands when done. “Repeated pools have shown that over 90% of the American Public supports laws requiring background checks on all gun purchasers, regardless of whether they buy weapons from licensed or private dealers. A survey conducted for the New England Journal of Medicine in January 2013 found that 84% of gun owners and 74% of NRA members also support requiring a universal background check system for all gun sales.”

Such gun control laws as back ground checks are effective if the seller is non-private. If criminals or the mentally unstable wanted to get their hands on a gun with no background check they can easily do so by buying from a private seller. When buying from a private seller there is no waiting period or back ground check therefore presenting instant access with a weapon. People that are unable to purchase a firearm from a store may also get someone to do it for them. In this case the purchaser may have a clean record and pass a background check, but be buying the weapon for a different purpose.

Also, another common arrangement that causes criminals have a gun is when they share guns and hold guns for other people. According to one study that adult offenders who’re living in Chicago or nearby that criminal’s guns come from their social network and personal connections. Also, it’s rarely for criminals to purchase a gun from the gun store. This way, Brady Bill puts in place criminals background checks at federally licensed dealers to prevent dangerous people from purchasing guns. Background checks help to see if they are qualified of owning a gun and if they are prohibited purchaser. This law prevents guns from getting into the hands of dangerous people. According to Oregon and Washington that they expanded Brady background

In 1968, the “Gun Control Act” was passed for a specific purpose which was “keeping firearms out of the hands of those not legally entitled to possess them because of age, criminal background, or incompetence.” The Act was made particularly to control imported guns, expand some requirements on the gun-dealer licensing and record keeping, and to place specific limits on sale of handguns. In 1977 the District of Columbia passed an anti-handgun law which required that all rifles and shotguns within its district should be registered. Just like these, there are many more laws that have been passed through the years, so that the government can have more “control” over the people buying guns, and using them. The most recent case filed was in June

Even if possessing a gun is illegal, criminals will always have a way of possessing a gun. According to a study done by Mark Judge in 2015, “Of the 70 who admitted to having access to a gun, the survey found that only two (3 percent) were purchased directly from a gun store. Most had gotten their guns illegally: “adults who are entitled to possess a gun are more likely than not to buy from an FFL [licensed dealer].” Criminals can effortlessly obtain a gun with money through the black market. They are very unlikely to walk into a gun store to buy a gun. Therefore background checks do not affect criminals at all. Many gun control advocates have thought of methods to restrict guns to criminals such as background checks, limiting the size of magazines, and regulating the type of guns. In the article, Making Gun Control Happen, written by a pro-gun control advocate Patrick Radden Keefe deems that, “One obvious change would be to mandate a criminal background check for all gun purchases.” The more gun control laws, there are, the easier is it for criminals to act out their crime due to there being a less of a chance for a citizen stopping the criminal with a

The right to bear arms is an issue even when individuals don't pay much mind to it. It's every where and is surrounding the world at every stake. Fights, arguments, low self-esteem, homicides, suicides, murder, crimes, drive bys, school shootings, self defence all revolve around guns. Not everything bad like murder or killing is a gun’s fault in action. Ownership in guns are 31% female and 37% male. Of these owners 42% of them have high school diplomas or less. 37% of whites, 32% of blacks, and 33% of nonwhites. Highest rate of ownership of guns in ages 50-64 is 45%. We should have the ability to have possession of a gun, however the state should have a boundary of laws and regulations to owning one.

Those that resist will band together in the face of tyranny for the sake of their freedom, and they will form a militia. The same thing took place in 1776 when in the face of an oppressive government our founding fathers signed the Declaration of Independence, and they formed their militia from freedom loving Americans who were sick of the British putting unfair taxes on their goods and treating them as second class citizens. They came together for the common goal of freedom, not afraid to die but valuing freedom over peace without it, and without their firearms they never would’ve succeeded. Likewise, in the event of a governmental ban of all firearms we would need to form a militia, and take our rights back from those who would oppress us.