preview

Arguments For The Treaty Of Versailles

Decent Essays

The reparations outlined in the Treaty of Versailles sparked an outrage because many thought that it was unfair to not directly state the amount of reparations that were going to be paid. That is a valid argument, but most people were not aware of what kind of state Germany was in even after the war. Margaret Macmillan brings up a huge point in saying that after the war, “Germany was also potentially very powerful. Its infrastructure was largely untouched by the war; it had a large and educated population; and, even without Austria, it was the biggest country in Europe west of the new Soviet Russia” (Pg.3). Even though it was not directly stated how much in reparations they were going to pay, Germany was capable of paying it off. For many other countries, the amount of $33 billion would take possibly up to a century to pay off, and it only took Germany a generation. Like Macmillan said, Germany had the infrastructure to keep their economy strong and the smarts to pay off that massive amount of debt with ease. Even though it was unfair …show more content…

Yet, when looking at the treaty in depth, you see that not all of it was totally unreasonable. Inside the Treaty of Versailles, it states that Germany will not be allowed to join the League of Nations. The League was a group formed after the first World War and meant to be a group of countries coming together to make up a national peace group, just like the United Nations. Even though the League was an utter failure, Germany should not have been allowed to join it. The rule was set for all instigators in the war, that they would not be a part of the League at that moment. Not many people argue the fact that Germany was not allowed in the League of Nations, because they helped start a World War. Germany did not disagree with this term because they understood why they were not allowed to join the League. This term was fair because Germany was excluded due to

Get Access