preview

Armistead And Hancock Friendship Quotes

Decent Essays

Armistead and Hancock shared a very strong friendship throughout the book. The two of them met at West Point and were split when Armistead decided to fight for the South and Hancock decided to fight for the North. When the point of view shifted to Armistead in Day Three, he saw that Longstreet brought comfort to soldiers just by his presence. Armistead remembered that Hancock could do that as well, and he realized how much he missed his dear friend. He wondered about Hancock and said aloud, “If I lift a hand against you, friend, may God strike me dead.” (That quote can be found on page 314.) As Armistead pondered these thoughts, he thought, “I wish it was not Hancock atop that hill… I wish… the war was over.” (That quote can be found …show more content…

They were not afraid to share their thoughts with the other person, whether that man wanted to hear it or not. When General Lee told Longstreet that a frontal assault would be a disaster on Day Three of battle, Longstreet protested, saying, “…If we try to move in support it has to come from miles off, and their cannon can see every move. Heck, their cannons are looking down on us right now. General Lee, sir, this is not a good position.” (That quote can be found on page 286.) Lee most certainly did not want to hear that from his closest general, but he simply replied that the Union forces would eventually break. Lee and Longstreet felt comfortable around each other, and they seemed to have a connection. They both understood that they approached the same situations with different tactics, and they accepted that fact. On the First Day of battle, Longstreet said to Lee about reproaching Stuart, “’Yes, by George. Maybe. Reproach from you. Yes.’ Longstreet grinned widely. ‘Might do the job. But me… I’m not good at …show more content…

‘We’ll have the advantage of moving downhill,’ he said.” (That quote can be found on page 226.) In this quote, Chamberlain was confident and decisive, which was two qualities that the Union forces needed in a general. I admire his leadership, and I hope that someday I can be as confident and thoughtful as he was.
I also admire his courage in his encounter with the Southern minister and Virginian professor. His belief that the blacks were equivalent to the white people is similar to mine. Chamberlain told Kilrain his visit, “I remember him sitting there, sipping tea. I tried to point out that a man is not a horse, and he replied, very patiently, that that was the thing I did not understand, that a Negro is not a man. Then I left the room.” (That quote can be found on page 177.) I understand that he lived in the nineteenth century whereas I live in the twenty-first, but there are many racist people in the world today that I have not stood up like Chamberlain did. My family and I are close friends with a black woman who works at Guerin and is married to a white man. I have talked to many different people who know them and do not think that they should be married based on their skin color; I get very confused and aggravated. The black woman is one of the nicest people I have ever met, and she acts like a normal human would. Chamberlain wondered a question similar to the following in 1863, and I wonder the same question today: Why would color

Get Access