preview

Art Does Not Need To Be Pretty

Decent Essays

The question of beauty has been asked since the beginning of time and yet there is still no precise answer. When discussing this same question and applying it to works of art a number of answers could be as large as the population. Henri Matisse and Francis Bacon have both inspired artists for generations and are considered to be opposite sides of the coin. Matisse created paintings with bright, happy colors mixing in patterns and showed life as it was viewed from the outside, leading to the idea that he created pretty paintings. On the other hand, Bacon produced intense paintings which included rich, dark colors that expressed the agony that can only be viewed from within oneself. When the viewer immerses themselves in both styles of painting it will be clear that art does not need to “be pretty”. One must look at the root of the person creating the art to truly understand the beauty of the piece. Matisse attended law school in …show more content…

As a child, he was shy and enjoyed dressing up even though this really upset his father. In 1926, Bacon was found admiring himself dressed in women’s undergarments and was thrown out of the home where his family lived (Wiki). Inside his mind, there was a battle that would never cease and this type of inner torment can be seen in his work. One such piece of work was Bacons rendition of the Portrait of Pope Innocent X (1650 Velazquez). The resemblances of the versions included the Pope sitting in a chair looking directly at the viewer. However, that is where the similarities end. In the 1953 painting, Bacon tore away the flesh from the Pope leaving a screaming skeleton in the place of the stern-faced pope in the original painting. Being up to interpretation, I view this painting in as if Bacons goal was to capture the anger that he had received his whole life from his father and religious leaders of the

Get Access