preview

Aspects And Misconceptions Of Rape Myths, And Stereotypes

Good Essays

Rape myths are an extremely active concept in society. Over time, the same rape myths have been recurrently applied when the concept of sexual assault arises. In John Hamlin’s (2001) study he defines rape myths as prejudicial outlooks on sexual assault which effectively downplay its severity and discredits the complainant. Hamlin states that “[rape] myths exist for many historic reasons which include inherited structural conditions, gender role expectations, and the fundamental exercise of power in a patriarchal society” (Hamlin, 2001). Rape myths are put on display in the Supreme Court case of R. v. Ewanchuk (1999), as the case revolves around several assumptions and misconceptions regarding sexual assault. This paper will illustrate how rape myths are extremely negative by analyzing the Ewanchuk case along with R. v. Ghomeshi (2016), racism in societal assumptions regarding women who are raped, and the notion of masculinity.

In the case of R. v. Ewanchuk, a 49 year old man is accused of sexual assault on a 17 year old girl. The complainant was called by the defendant for a job interview at a shopping mall in Alberta. The initial interview was conducted in the defendant’s vehicle, and afterwards the complainant was invited into the defendant’s trailer to see some of his work. Out of discomfort, the complainant deliberately left the trailer door open but the defendant closed it in a way which gave the complainant the presumption that he had locked it. The accused

Get Access