Australia Border Defence Essay

Protecting the country and Asia Pacific region – The ADf’s main object is to protect Australia’s borders and allied countries from local and foreign threats

Although Australia remains geographically isolated from the world, international trade still remains a main factor that allows Australia’s economy to prosper. Australia’s long history of trade has created tight links and connections with other nations. Being a member of many worldwide organisations, Australia has produced many free trade agreements with countries around the world. However, recently Australia has seen a change in the composition and direction of its trade and has developed a strong trade link with the Asia-Pacific Region.

Australia is considered among important allies of United States. In the Vietnam war Australia sent a force of 50 000. Being situated in Southern Hemisphere of Southeast Asia, Australia has to face exceptional defense challenges much more than neighboring partner. Historically Australia seems to be willing to accept the major role in military interventions in the surrounding area as can be seen in East Timor.

After World War II in the 20th century, the United States and the Soviet Union were the new “Superpowers”. These two major nations had two conflicting political ideologies which were stated as Capitalism and Communism, and this had Australia right in the middle of the story. Since Australia has very strong ties with the US, making it even stronger after involving in the Vietnam War and also grew strong with the ‘SEATO’ and ‘ANZUS’ with the fear of the so called ‘domino theory’ and the foreign policies which including the Forward Defence Policy. This, however, allowed Australia to gain a closer chance to go to war in Vietnam.

However, the domestic sphere is vital to Australian policy and must be engaged to improve relations with Indonesia. A 2013 survey of the Australian public commissioned by DFAT in 2013 found that 53% of Australian believe Indonesia is not a democracy and 54% believe Australia is right to worry about Indonesia as a military threat (Roberts and Habir 2015: 205). This is worrying as domestic support does effect on Australian foreign policy (Stephens and Gruber 2010: 38) Australian generosity, diplomacy and funding have been the most successful method of deepening relations

Since the very beginning of UN peacekeeping, Australia has partaken in various operations in Cambodia, Korea, Namibia, Rwanda, Somalia and many others, this would have been large contributions to Australia's current inter-relationships.

Australia is a multicultural country that will continue to develop in such a way under the influences of interacting with other countries. This will help expand Australia’s diversity and encourage social behaviours. Australia in many cases uses tied aid to benefit developing countries which also offers a majority of job opportunities for Australians. Take for example the devastating 2005 Pakistan earthquake which impacted the nation greatly. Australia assisted by donating AU $40 million as well as supplying Pakistan with professionals in the construction of new buildings and schools as well as health facilities, providing overseas job opportunities to

Australia and Australians naturally pursue to advance and maintain the security, economic prosperity and advocate our liberal democratic values by committing and showcasing them internationally. These three aspects are crucial and considered Australia’s key national interests due to their importance and essential benefits. Defence can support and aid us in recovery when we face unpredictable events of adversity. Our liberal democracy demonstrates a strong belief and core system which allows Australians to have political and economic freedom whilst having an approach to international affairs. Australia’s liberal democracy is also strongly linked to and requires a stable and resourceful economy in order for it to function. This enables

Australia is nation with strong relationship with America since the end of cold war. However Australia and Asia share a close and complementary economic relationship. International security is currently one of Australia’s problems the government is dealing with. Under the foreign policy Australia became a member of the US- led coalition in Islamic State/Daesh in Iraq and Syria . Since the early century Australia has always play it part in the international community when it needed. Looking at 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United State, this situation was seen as a major threat to international peace and security . Since Australia is allied with the United State and

The paradigm shift of Australian foreign policy from reliance on security through ‘‘great and powerful friends’’ towards the formation and strengthening of diplomatic and cultural relations with the Asia-Pacific region began arguably under the Whitlam government and has since become the predominant focus of foreign policy for both major parties. As a result, there exists a latent similarity in the foreign policy of successive Australian governments across the last 40 years that becomes more pronounced when comparing them within their respective partisan delineations. Thus, the apparent similarity in the foreign policy of the Hawke-Keating and Rudd-Gillard governments is hardly surprising. However, the extent of this similarity is

Australian – British relations are one of the closest international relationships in existence, marked by culture, institutions and language, Australia have a few interconnection with England by military, tourism, migration, economic, sports, culture, science and engineer. Firstly, Globalisation is acting an important role between Australia and England, however what is globalisation? Globalization is the process by which the world is becoming increasingly interconnected as a result of massively increased trade and cultural exchange. Globalization has increased the production of goods and services.

Australia cannot be secured in an insecure region (2000,2009). In Asia(Indo)-Pacific area where both countries have big stake, it is in Australia’s interests to maintain the U.S.’s primacy and avoid the region dominated by any other single power. With achieving this, it also helps to deter any serious conflicts between the regional countries. To fulfil these objectives, Australia’s expeditionary operations are important in coalition with the U.S. to support and legitimize its roles in other regions. This, in return, could help to maintain the U.S. commitment in Asia (Indo)-Pacific

Australia’s national security landscape has changed significantly throughout its history, especially through the Howard, Rudd and Gillard years when fuelled by globalisation, terrorism and widespread economic turmoil. However, despite the varying nature of the threat landscape over the past century Australia has not until recently documented a combined, singular, national approach to national security policy. Both the 2008 National Security Statement and the 2013 Australian National Security Strategy have sought to fill a critical gap in Australia’s policy theatre however the efficacy of these documents to achieve these goals is heavily debated. This paper critically analyses the 2013 National Security Strategy, through

Since the second half of the twentieth century, Australia's agreement with the USA has been the focal component of its security and defence policy. The powerful economic growth of China in the second decade of the twenty-first century allows Nick Bisley to outline the tension between Australia's economic and strategic interests due to the increased rivalry between China and the US. With the antagonism between the two nations; the authors thesis is that the pursuit of the US alliance is the best policy for Australia both strategically and politically. Bisley demonstrates this ideology through the analysis of the benefits and costs of Australia's United States (US) alliance, political factors of the alliance and how likely it is for the

George Friedman, the head of the private intelligence firm Stratfor, knows his stuff. Despite the criticism of his book The Next 100 Years, as being outlandish and a little bit crazy, I found it to be an interesting worldview on the development of the world and geopolitics the next 100 years. While the suggestion of giant battle stations above Earth within 100 years seems outlandish we may have too consider space a military zone, despite international agreement that's suggest otherwise. The main thesis, as I understand it, is about how countries use and keep to an overarching Grand Strategy and that thinking in this way helps us understand international relations in the past and into the future. What I couldn't help think about in this book is how this geopolitics affect Australia.