Barefoot Running Bibliography

Also a repeated measure ANOVA was used to test differences between footwear conditions in eccentric and concentric phases by intensity. Using ANOVA versus conducting multiple T-test was a benefit to the study. ANOVA decreases the chance of making a type 1 error. If there was statistical significance identified from the analysis a post hoc test was ran to help identify where the significance came from. In this study statistical analysis was performed using PASW

The study will be a single-centered, crossover, randomized control trial which will aim to determine which foot condition, barefoot or shod, allows for best performance of the SEBT. The dependent variable is reach distance. The independent variable is the differing foot conditions, barefoot versus shod. The SEBT will produce continuous, ratio data measured in centimeters. A quantitative primary research approach will be used as quantitative measurements allow for statistical comparison between variables, which will allow the hypothesis to be accepted or rejected (Barker et al., 2016). 1:1 block randomization will be used in this study, with participant being randomly assigned to either barefoot or shod first groups of equal sizes using the crossover design. Randomization

Born to Run by Christopher McDougall is a nonfiction book about how Chris searches throughout the world on the journey to find out why does your foot hurt. In this book, Chris travels the world in search of the best runners and stumbles across barefoot runners, which totally revolutionised what he believed was good for your feet. This search brought him to Mexico’s Copper Canyons.

Commonly times runners will be impacted from heel pain. When you operate your feet will strike the rug more than 1.000 times throughout each distance that works. The plantar fascia suffers away from the total amount of force include it within jog. Improper running sneakers regularly do not provide help to this issue, very often the cause of plantar fasciitis.

Over 200 years ago the invention of running shoes started. The idea of inventing the running shoe was to have lightweight shoe which could grip the ground .it designed to make it more comfortable for an athlete to run with (https://runningtortoiseandhare.wordpress.com/running-shoes/history-of-running-shoes/).This essay will talk about the history of the athletic shoes.

Trimble writes that people have been runner without shoes longer than they have with shoes. He says that people have evolved for running. In the essay Trimble quotes a journal that reveals the fact that there is no evidence that would suggest running without shoes is dangerous. In fact, the opposite is true. It is manmade ground that is causing the difficulty for runners. A new shoe was made called the Springbuck, which takes that into consideration in its design

After reading this article I became aware that the main purpose of it was to educate individuals on the long time injuries that one is at risk for when performing running activates barefoot. In most cases, injuries are often multi-factorial, and it

An alternative way that this experiment could have been conducted would be to increase the number of participants being studied. A greater number of participants would diversify the level of athleticism. Another change that could be made to this experiment would be to test using multiple types of shoes, like a minimalist shoe, a stability shoe, and a motion controlled shoe to see if the type of shoe causes an effect on stride length. Overall the changes made in this alternative method, would diversify the results so they could be applied to more individuals, and not just

In the twenty-fifth chapter of Born to Run, the author writes about the rise of running injuries being caused by the running shoes. The author claims the best shoes are the worst, feet like a good beating, and human beings are designed to run without shoes. All of these theories are true. Many researchers agree that the modern running shoe causes the rise in running related injuries. The author writes about how it is completely reasonable to blame this on Nike. All of this is their fault. There are several studies being conducted, and none of the outcomes favor Nike. The shoes harm the feet more than they will ever protect them.

This means that with each step, the entire weight of the body lands on the heel instead of the ball or middle of the feet. Sounds innocent enough, but over time, this can lead to some serious foot and leg injuries. Barefoot running, on the other hand, is the ideal way to go. But running sans shoes, and on the right surfaces, increases the chances of landing on the ball of the feet or with a flat foot. Benefits include decreased injury like ankle sprains, plantar fasciitis and other chronic foot injuries. Plus, running barefoot reduces oxygen consumption so you don’t tire as

Did you know in the article ‘’Running Barefoot Laced with Health Benefits’’ barefoot causes less collision force to your feet when running? Running barefoot is better than running while running with shoes. Three reasons why it’s better is because it is comfortable while running. Another reason is that it uses proper running form when running. The final reason is that it uses less collision force.

In the early part of the decade, many runners jumped on the barefoot running bandwagon, but the trend seems to have peaked. Most runners upkeep a daily regimine and to run barefoot or wearing minimalist shoes requires re-learning to run. When you run with traditional

Foot injuries are very common in athletics as well as in everyday life. It’s very debilitating to have a foot injury since we use our feet in all of our daily activities. Research published in "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise” indicates that the average adult takes between 5,000 to 7,000 steps a day. Some sports require the most dedicated athletes spend multiple hours a day pounding their feet on the turf or pavement. Most injuries that occur in the foot require a person to try and stay off of it or completely immobilize it. Since this is very difficult for a person to do, a large percentage of foot injuries often have a very high chance of reoccurring. The severity of some injuries that can be deceiving as well. Often times a nagging pain is ignored and eventually becomes a much bigger problem.

Participating in basketball begins with picking which basketball shoes to wear. The purpose of a sports shoe is to improve performance or reduce the risk of injury (Fong, Hong & Li, 2007). While playing the game of basketball I’ve realized it is a sport that involves different types of shoes which help improve jumping, landing, cutting and much more. Basketball has its positives and negatives for every age group; it has good health benefits, but it also consists of moderate to high risk lower body injuries to the lower back, legs and ankles. There are different types of basketball shoes which consist of high tops, mid tops, low cuts, cushioned shoes, non-cushioned shoes, and other different combinations. The high tops basketball shoe will have a collar that goes above the ankle like a sleeve. The mid tops basketball shoe covers slightly above the ankle, but lower than high tops. The low cut basketball shoes don’t have a collar at all and they don’t cover the ankle. Shoes also vary by weight and outsole traction. Through my knowledge picking the shoe to wear is solely on your preference. Whatever shoe that you choose will have different advantages or disadvantages to them. The purpose of this literature review is to explore the variety of effects specific shoe types have on basketball athletes.

This study was a semi-experimental study with a repeated-measures design. To start the experiment, the examinee wore the stretch pants and the standard Oxford shoes. Then reflective markers were attached to the subject and he was asked to walk with free-speed walking on the walkway during the test. After this preparation phase, the examinee walked along a three-meter walkway in six different subsets and data were collected. Each subset of trial with different conditions was repeated three times. A trial was considered successful if the subject's right foot landed on the force plate. In order to prevent fatigue and to have the same condition in all trials, the subjects took five-minute intervals between trials. Test conditions