Barronelle Stutzman's Involvement In A Same-Sex Wedding

Thank you for your post. The reason I chose to include the cases are to show how the issue of a business owner refusing sexuality is becoming popular, and is being argued in court more. Many business owners are actually fine with giving their services to one of the opposite sex, however when that service is extended that goes against their beliefs, values, or morals then they have a problem with providing. Such as the case that I mentioned above, the State of Washington v. Arlene’s Flowers, where the florist served the couple many times but when asked provide a service for their wedding she refused as it goes against her faith. How do you propose we find a solution for this issue?

Andrew Sullivan is the author of an article “Why Gay Marriage is Good for Straight America.” He is an experienced publicist, and he is homosexual. Sullivan argues that every person has the right to get married disregarding his or her orientation. Richard Rodriguez who is also a famous publicist composed “Family Values.” Like Sullivan, he is homosexual and he discusses it in his work. Rodriguez and Sullivan share many viewpoints related to homosexuality, but they disagree about the appropriateness of homosexual marriage – Sullivan is for it, and Rodriguez views it as an imitation of heterosexuality.

There are many different topics in the world that split people’s opinions. Some stronger than others. These views and opinions are often swayed by one’s political views, and one of the biggest topics that sparks controversy are the rights of all people. Some of the bigger groups are Black Lives Matter and feminists. While these are very big and prominent, the one that sparks the most controversy is the LGBT community, and one of the biggest claims they make is that they don’t have the same rights of marriage as straight people. The LGBT community have protests and parades to try to spread the message that homosexuals should have the same rights of

(63) She has to learn to change her way of thinking, her “foundation” of what was normal. Her upbringing in her southern church causes her to believe that a homosexual relationship is unholy. She could not turn to her pastor, Reverend Barden nor to Henrietta Fuchee, the prim music teacher because they were judgmental. Orthodox Jews, Roman Catholics and conservative Protestant groups like the Southern Baptist Convention remain adamantly opposed to gay marriage”.

Miller, Lisa. “Gay Marriage: Our Mutual Joy.” Wake Tech English 111 Reader, edited by Julie Fenton- Glass, Leslie Graybeal, et al. Mason: Cengage, 2015, pp. 177-182.

The year is 2015 and I can’t imagine not having the freedom I do today. Marriage equality is a very recent topic in history. It wasn’t very long ago that laws prohibited the marriage of same-sex couples. I have decided to investigate the history of marriage equality and the organizations that helped make the dream come true. In order to fully understand the changes that occurred, and to comprehend the level of discrimination that was felt in the homosexual culture, one must first understand the history of the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer) community. The harsh history of the LGBTQ community, and discrimination that was imposed on them and the organizations that strived to advocate for the LGBTQ community on a local, regional and national level is what eventually lead to the Supreme Court ruling on June 26th, 2015, stating that states cannot ban same-sex marriage.

Over the years in our country’s history it has been apparent that the idea of same sex marriages is becoming much more popular, however in most states there is still one thing stopping them. That one thing stopping two people from the pursuit of happiness which they desire is a social injustice. Social injustices are situations where a person or group of people is treated unfairly due to certain factors for example discrimination, prejudice, racism, heterosexism, sexism, and so forth. In the case of same sex marriages, the factor playing a major role in this social injustice is where most people believe that opposite sexes attract, but in the case of a same sex couple wanting to be married, this brings about many topics to be discussed by

“The case for same-sex marriage” is a protest against the lack of legislation protecting same-sex couples or allowing them to marry. Evidence can be found in her craft decisions. As the main component of her argument, she uses a personal anecdote about her experience when a man stopped her in the street to ask if she was going to vote “yes” on the bill. She discusses that his main argument was that allowing same-sex marriage would change the definition of marriage. However, Savino responds with the fact that the institution of marriage is largely flawed in America, as even strangers can travel to a courthouse and marry. By addressing the opposing argument, Savino makes her protest very substantial. Her personal word choice, as well as specifically naming couples that depend on the passing of the bill, make the speech more moving as well. Overall, she made strong craft decisions that support the protest for marriage equality for the LGBT

A woman is raised in a family with two mothers, but is against gay marriage. This sounds like the beginning of a slightly offensive joke. Someone who has lived in the community, and even raised by it, shouldn’t have such a negative opinion on a matter that involves the rights of the people she has known for years, right? Surprisingly, this person exists and has written an article to express her ‘coming out’ as being against gay marriage.

Recently, people have been arguing with respect to the definition of marriage. To get married is a very important event for almost everyone. Particularly for women, marriage and giving a birth could be the two major events of their lives. Andrew Sullivan and William Bennett are authors who are arguing about homosexual marriage. Sullivan believes in same-sex marriage because he thinks everyone has a right to marry. On the other hand, Bennett speaks out against Sullivan’s opinion. Bennett makes a claim that marriage is between a man and a woman structuring their entire life together. Both authors’ opinions differ on same-sex marriage. Nevertheless, their ideas are well recognized.

Three years ago, according to the Charging (Craig & Mullins) Party's viewpoint: On July 19, 2012, they walked into a place of public accommodations simply because they wanted a "no frills" wedding cake and were denied the full and equal enjoyment on the basis of their sexual orientation (gay). They were left unsaid of how they viewed themselves as a regular couple, their wedding a private celebration was not a political statement. Three years ago, according to the Respondent (Phillips) Party's viewpoint: On July 19, 2012, the Charging Party had visited his bakery wishing to purchase a wedding cake. Phillips informed them that he does not create wedding cakes for same sex couples but, that he would offer them...one for other occasions, such

For the past 3 decades the views surrounding marriage has undergone a great deal of change (Lennox, 2015, p. 1101). This shift is due to the continual discussion of gay marriage. The interplay of religion and politics has led for much controversy. In the United States, the use of Christian and Jewish biblical texts are the main sources drawn upon for opposition, but have also been used as a supportive means of equality. Beyond the religious there are also psychological and physical health arguments, as well as civil rights arguments. Same sex marriage is examined through different paradigms, thus giving rise to religious, political/legal, and religious arguments surrounding the legalization of this institution for gay and lesbian couples.

In his essay titled “Gay Marriage: Societal Suicide,” Charles Colson talks about his reasons for opposing same-sex marriage. The essays’ main argument is built around Colson’s belief that legalizing same-sex marriage would lead to the decoupling of marriage, and ultimately result in what he describes as: “an explosive increase in family collapse, out of wedlock births - and crime.” Colson shares his personal experiences as a prison minister, various studies, statistics, and real world examples to elucidate the reasons behind his controversial stance on marital rights.

One of the most controversial issues around today is gay marriages. Many believe that the media is primly responsible for the idea of same-sex marriages, but when it all comes down to it there are really only two sides; those who support gay marriages, and those who oppose them. Two authors write their opinions on their opposite views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports same-sex marriages and believes marriage to be a universal right, not just restricted to heterosexuals. Contrary to Sullivan, Bennett (2002) believes that marriage is a sacred traditional family value that should be set aside for heterosexual couples. (2002)Throughout this essay, I will summarize both authors’ ideas and evaluate them through their evidence and

By deconstructing the common comparison of same-sex marriage to interracial marriage, she intends to defend her view that interracial marriage is not a slippery slope decision that will roll down hill in an out of control manner and head for the worst like, she claims, same-sex marriage will. Opposing Barber’s views, Quindlen wrote an essay in 2008 entitled: “The Loving Decision” where she sets forth her support for same-sex marriage by constructing a comparison between interracial marriage and same-sex marriage. She uses this comparison to suggest that same-sex marriage will, too, be validated by the courts because “the world only spins forward” (258). Even though Barber and Quindlen stand on opposite sides of the debate with views clashing on fundamental concepts like the meaning of marriage, the nature of homosexuality, and the applicability of the Loving v. Virginia court case to the issue, in various areas the two authors have common ground.