The Battle of Olustee, also known as the Battle of Ocean Pond, only lasted for a single afternoon, but became the second bloodiest battle for the Union, when the casualties are compared to the number of soldiers engaged, and was the largest Civil War battle fought in Florida. This short battle, often forgotten when compared to grand battles fought during the four year war, is an superb example of how the Union took their chances and gave it their all, even when it was clear that the Confederates had better odds, and won the battle, in the end. On February 7, 1864, the commander of the Union’s Department of the South, General Quincy Gilmore, dispatched General Truman Seymour to Jacksonville, Florida, in hopes of securing land, politically; blocking, or disrupting Confederate supply …show more content…
Many individual soldier’s stories also demonstrate the resilience of either side, showing how unwilling they were to give up, and stop fighting, until absolutely necessary. Even John Hay’s efforts to get Florida to join upcoming United States political gatherings, show the unwavering pursuit for unity from the Union’s side.
The purpose of this project is to learn more about the Battle of Olustee, and how individuals, troops, and even the whole of both the Confederacy and Union stood up against each other, to fight for what they believed in, and prove that each person that participated in this battle found their own way to stand up for their beliefs. While proving that this topic relates to the theme is the main purpose of the project, another purpose is to learn more about what was happening throughout the United States before, during, and after the time that this battle
It was well believed until Jackson’s forces began unloading rounds on the Union army stopping McDowell’s forces from advancing, holding the line like “a stone wall.” As the new Union recruits witnessed battle for the first time and felt the lack of preparation, they were quick to retreat back to Washington DC. The Southern victory and the tens of thousands of lives lost proved to the Union that this war was not going to be easily won.
On June 6th 1944, the U.S. and allied forces executed an amphibious assault named Operation Neptune, commonly known as D-Day, along the north-western coastline region of France. The operation covered in this paper will discuss a key battle during the Invasion of Normandy. The Invasion of Normandy was a successful operation focused towards German-occupied Western Europe during World War II. This paper will also cover a brief history and key points of The Battle of Omaha Beach. Critical reasoning and battle analysis will be expressed through what intelligence assets were applied, utilized and available during the time era. The analysis outcome will lead to an expressed alternative ending on The Battle of Omaha Beach. A detailed explanation of how intelligence assets could have been used to change the course of the battle will defend the explained alternative ending discussed. The main points of discussion will include Adolf Hitler’s decision to move most of his tank divisions and infantry units 150 miles north to Calais, the significance of the highly effective group known as the French Resistance and a famous illusionist Jasper Maskelyne.
This paper will examine the British and American Southern Loyalist defeat in the Battle of Kings Mountain and discuss the assumptions the British made including loyalist support, logistic support, and terrain advantage.
No other war seems to hold our focus like the Civil War. Scholars have chosen to make it their life's work, authors have written reams about it, and we all feel some kind of connection to the Civil War. This paper was created to highlight some of the major battles that took place during that conflict. Major battles usually marked a drastic change in the momentum from one side to the other or led to massive losses of troops. These battles and their results all played a huge part in the outcome of the war.
The Battle of Gettysburg was the most decisive battle for the North, and it lasted for a total of three days. It began on July 1 and ended on July 3, 1863. The Confederacy was going on the offensive and was beginning to venture into Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Washington D.C. They encountered Union troops as they advanced towards Harrisburg where they planned to cut off Union supply lines and to steal provisions that they needed. The Battle of Gettysburg became the bloodiest multi-day battle ever fought in United States history. At the end of the Battle of Gettysburg, the Union claimed victory, and they would use this psychological advantage throughout the rest of the Civil War.
The battle of the Plains of Abraham was fought on the 13th of September 1759. It was the result of a three-month British siege of the French North American capital of Quebec City. Although the battle lasted for a short period of time, involved comparatively few troops, and caused few casualties, the effects of the battle were far reaching. The British victory at the battle resulted both in the death of the French general – the Marquis de Montcalm – and the British major general James Wolf. More importantly, the battle resulted in the capture of Quebec, which in turn, led to the capture of the remaining French territories of North America.
The Battle of Wanat is widely recognized as one of the most organized attacks against U.S forces in the Afghanistan war. This battle produced the most casualties on the American side since the start of the war in 2001. Nine United States soldiers were killed and 27 were wounded; however, between 21- 51 Taliban forces were claimed to have been killed. The Taliban forces knew where to attack the U.S. forces base and focus most of their fire power on the base weak spots. As for the United States, the biggest target was their most casualty producing weapons: a U.S. mortar tube and 50 Cal machine guns. The American forces also put the patrol base in an area that was hard to defend with many blind spots. The Taliban forces outnumbered U.S. forces vastly, attacking with about 300-400 Taliban soldiers to only 45
Fort Pickens garrison was an integral piece of the Union Navy’s gulf blockade campaign that lasted the entirety of the war. While Confederate forces occupied all mainland forts in the Pensacola Bay Area of Operations(AO), Union Navy and and Army assets located at Fort Pickens continually denied Confederate forces logistical support from British seafaring assets in the Gulf of Mexico. A truce had been reached by both occupying Armies before the onset of The American Civil War. The agreed upon conditions in their most basic sense were that the Confederate Army Soldiers in Pensacola would not attack Fort Pickens, if the Union Army would refrain from reinforcing their position. The Confederate Army action is historically described as a retaliatory attack for a raid on the Confederate ship Judah by sailors and marines from the U.S.S. Colorado. Rowing into the bay under cover of darkness, a boat party had surprised and torched the Judah in September 1861 before Confederate troops could quell the attack. Determined to retaliate for the bold raid, General Braxton Bragg, Commanding Officer for Confederate forces in Pensacola, decided to launch an attack on the outer camps and batteries of Fort Pickens on Santa Rosa Island. General Bragg was one of the most experienced Confederate Army Commanders and commanded about 7,000 Confederate Soldiers in the Pensacola Bay area of operations. Although it is often stated that Bragg hoped to capture the fort, his real goal seems to have been to destroy the camp of the 6th New York Volunteers. (exploresouthernhistory.com) The 6th New York Volunteers consisted of 600 light infantry troops and were Commanded by Cornel William Wilson, a former politician from New York. The 6th New York Volunteers had little combat experience at this point in the war, but their reputation for drinking and mischief had followed them down
James M. McPherson, author of For Cause and Comrades, uses more than 25,000 unaltered letters and closely 250 private journals from Civil War soldiers—both Union and Confederate—in his attempt to explain what possessed these men to endure the roaring, gruesome chaos of war. What better way to express the motivation behind fighting than words straight from the pens of the men who were physically there and experienced the Civil War to its fullest? I personally feel as though McPherson succeeded in his explanation of the different driving forces that kept each man going during these difficult years of battle. The Wall Street Journal describes McPherson’s work as “an extraordinary book, full of fascinating details and moving self-portraits.”
The battle of Spotsylvania was a really bloody. The Union Army of the Potomac consisted of 100,000 soldiers led by generals Ulysses S. Grant and George Meade. The Confederate Army of Virginia was nearly half the size with only 52,000 soldiers. They were led by General Robert E. Lee. General Grant began the campaign in early May, marching his army into Virginia. The Confederates dug in and waited for the Union to attack. Grant's army attacked several times over the next few days. On May 12, Grant massed his soldiers for a major attack on the center of the Confederate line. They smashed through the line and split the Confederate Army down the middle. However, the Confederates didn't give up. They fought really hard and managed to hold off the
The battle of Monmouth had concluded less than a day ago. This is my account of what had happened amongst the chaos.
The battle of Mons was one of the first interactions between the British and German forces in World War I. This battle ended with a clear, although heavily battered victory for the German First Army. Although the British fought valiantly and with fewer casualties than those of their German antagonist; the outcome of this battle could have been altered. Through the use of proper intelligence preparation of the battle field, and human intelligence, the outcome could have been a British victory. Over the remainder of this paper, I will explain how the battle was fought and lost, how the improper planning of the Allied forces directly caused the loss in this battle and how proper implementation of scouts as human intelligence could have given enough warning to change the outcome even with the poor planning.
“Battle Cry of Freedom; The Civil War Era id a work of such vast scope necessarily emphasizes synthesis at the expense of theme. If there is a unifying idea in the book, it is McPherson 's acknowledged emphasis on “the multiple meanings of
After a series of quick victories for the Germans, the First Battle of the Marne marked the first use of trench warfare on the Western front and the French were able to gain a critical victory for the Allies using good communication and better organization than the Germans. In the first few weeks of the war, the Germans were trying to push the Russians back to Russia in the east. In the fifth week of the war, the Germans had destroyed the Russian army at the Battle of Tannenberg. Before the Battle of the Marne, at the end of August, the Germans had been advancing on Paris for two weeks. The path the Germans planned to take to defeat the French was based on the Schlieffen Plan. This was a German military strategy for a two-front war with France and Russia created by Count Alfred von Schlieffen, the chief of the
“Three days after the fall of Fort Sumter in April of 1861, President Abraham Lincoln proclaimed a blockade of all Southern ports” (“The story of the Battle of Port Royal” 2012).After the fall of Fort Sumter, there was a new order for the ports to be closed. The South refused this order. Because of this refusal, the Union wanted to punish the South. The North had a plan to form a blockade of the Southern ports. In order to continue with