1. Reflect on the conversations during our forum discussion about Israel’s development among other cultures. Are the conclusions we drew from class discussion similar to the conclusions Carr & Conway suggest? Why or why not?
Overall, our class discussions during this week about the development of Israel in relation to other cultures were aligned with what David M. Carr and Colleen M. Conway suggest in An Introduction to the Bible: Sacred Texts and Imperial Contexts.
Carr & Conway present theories of how aspects of other more developed cultures entered into the biblical stories as shared elements that have been crafted to resemble Israelite beliefs and view point. In our class discussions we were able to find these same similarities, particularly
In Ronald A. Wells History Through the Eyes of Faith, we see Wells compare and contrast the Greek and the often brushed over Hebrew societies. This analysis goes through the many different points of the two very different cultures opening the eyes of the reader as to how and why they were different. Also, with this kind of analysis it would not be beneficial unless the conclusions are accurate, which is why in the case of Wells study of Greek and Hebrew culture, it is beneficial.
It does not take a Bible scholar to understand that one of the most significant people groups throughout history has been the Israelites. According to Biblical narrative, Israel is significant. An understanding of who the Israelites are and where they came from is necessary to understand the Bibles redemptive narrative. This paper will seek to provide insight as to how the Israelites came about and who they are.
Every culture has a story in attempt to explain its human origin. The endeavor to understand human existence has been prevalent for as long as we have been on this earth. Origin stories explain the natural world of a group through their religion, customs, and interactions. Indigenous creation stories, such as the Cherokee nation, highlight their connection to the land, language, sacred history, and ceremony. Likewise, the Biblical story of creation emphasizes his or her relationship to their creator and the traditions that arise from that relationship. When analyzing these stories, one can see similarities and differences between them, why they are essential in understanding where a group originated from, and the Peoplehood Model.
Throughout the course of the semester, we have constantly talked about and expressed the idea of reading the Bible in a historical context. Picking out the pieces that coincide with evidence that has been found with archeological findings, the accuracy of dates, and important people. The critical study of the Bible is to look at the book as a piece of historical text. The use of our “historical lens” allows us to pick out to various pieces that appear to be factual. Using this analysis of looking at the Bible through our “historical glasses”, we can understand the true meaning of the Bible in its original historical setting.
The Bible Among the Myths begins by stating that while the information since the 1960s has remained unaffected, the scrutiny has altered. The author, John N. Oswalt, begins his text by introducing the relative understanding of the Old Testament and Ancient Near East’s way of life and religion. Oswalt addresses the change of Israelite religion in comparison with other religions that were once believed to be unique by scholars. It is presently believed that the Old Testament is practically indistinguishable to the other religions of its time.
The parallels between the origin stories of the Iroquois and the Navajo to that of the Judaic-Christian story of Genesis are uncanny, to say the least. Although these Native American origin stories had existed for some time before first contact with European settlers, the fact remains that the similarities between each respective people’s telling of their own origins are too great to be ignored. Both the Native American origin stories and that of the story of Genesis share overt good & evil symbolism, a presence of a divine creator, and an exodus from a seemingly perfect world due to a commonality in themes pertaining to human origin, but also differ in noticeable ways due to idiosyncratic distinctions in each
We recently read two stories in class from two very different cultures. One from Mesopotamian literature called The Epic of Gilgamesh, and one from Hebrew literature called “Noah and the Flood”, which is from Genesis. Since they are both creation stories, there are a few key similarities, but, being that they are from these two different cultures, there will be multiple cultural belief differences.
Looking back, we can see glimpses of the lives of those who lived in the Ancient Near East, known as the ANE, through their stories and myths that have survived over centuries of time. Many of these stories contain unique elements that make each one personal to the civilization that they belong to, but there are common themes and ideas that are virtually shared between the traditional stories stemming from this region of the world. In fact, these parallels even extend into Old Testament literature; laced within the stories that we’ve come to know and love. It is not surprising that the Old Testament contains similarities found within ANE tradition, seeing that
Israel is undoubtedly a country for the history books with its great conflicts, victories, atrocities, and deep necessity which makes it quite unique from any others and there are perhaps no better words to describe its history than with “tragedy” and “triumph.” After this semester, I feel that I have a pretty clear viewpoint on these ideas. The triumph of Israel is its very existence both in general and specifically as a place for Jewish people that saved thousands and harbored refugees in times of great peril and horror for Jews. On the other hand, its tragedy is clearly the intense, seemingly unending conflict which is deeply ingrained within the region and that its very existence necessitates with the Arabs, as well as more specific
In addition to business risk factors that must be researched, there is more information that should be disclosed to David and Chuck. They need to review previous years’ income statements. Looking over them will show if this business is growing or not. If there happens to be a decline in the net income over the past few years, Bibles-R-Us may not be a wise business purchase. This shows that either the Bible buying market is shrinking or people have been purchasing the competitor’s Bibles. In order to become more informed about Bibles-R-Us, David and Chuck need to know who is buying the Bibles. Are they sold online, out of small retail bookstores, or large wholesalers? Information on these contracts could show a risky market base if the Bibles
John H. Walton’s Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible is broken up into fourteen chapters. Those fourteen chapters are each part of one of five sections. This book also contains over twenty historical images. Before the introduction, the author gives readers a full appendix of all images used in this published work. The author then gives his acknowledgements followed by a list of abbreviations.
Studying the religion of the Ancient Israelite People must be done in a careful manner. The ways in which biblical scholars frame significant ideas can have a major effect on how their point is received. Today’s ideas about the religious lives of Canaanites have been drawn on primarily from The Hebrew Bible and archaeological evidence. In their respective works, biblical scholars Benjamin Sommer and Carol Meyers choose to interpret these pieces of religious evidence is varying ways; Meyers takes a more cultural approach while Sommer’s has a theological leaning. Recognizing these different perspectives, I prefer the approach that Meyers takes because of its focus in anthropology.
My essay test on the middle east: Jews have a Torah which in my perspective looks like a scroll, but in their opinion and the way they look at it is and own meaning it is call the”First 5 Books of the bible, They have a prophet that they believe in is moses and they have believed that is the greatest prophet they know. When they wanna go and do their religious practices/worship they will go to the synagogue and their is a person that they see as the creator of Judaism and goes by the name of “Abraham”. The Jewish people i think had it hard life back then they were treated poorly and had limited rights at one point they were slaves and worked non-stop and would work for whoever got the right to have them and how many of them and they think that abraham had set them free and they had roamed in open areas where there
“It is now evident that Judaism in the land of Israel was open to Greek influences from the 3rd century onwards in the areas of language, economics, military strategy, politics, culture and religion”.3
“Israel’s Bible begins with an extended look at the world prior to Israel instead of assuming that the world began when it came to be.” “Gen 2-9 is introduced by Gen 1 and carried forward by Gen 10-11. Gen 1-11 then is a single story, an unusually sustained “philosophical” and “theological” explanation,” explaining our relationship with God, our flaws and destiny and religious institutions.