preview

Birdcage Analysis

Decent Essays

The Birdcage – A Macroscopic View of Systemic Oppression
“#AllLivesMatter”. “#NotAllMen”. “Why isn’t there a White History Month?” “Yes, women of colour are beautiful, but I think what you mean to say is all women are beautiful.”
“But isn’t a woman telling a man to ‘sit down and shut up’, sexist?” Discernibly, these retorts all demonstrate that it is possible to experience some kind of reverse subjugation, right? Well no, not exactly. So, is reverse sexism possible? Is reverse racism possible? With a focus on systemic oppression in this essay, I attempt to answer these questions while defending the position that reverse racism and reverse sexism do not exist. I will discuss how reverse oppression – be it reverse racism, or female privilege – cannot exist because the very nature of oppression will not allow for it. I attempt to do this by engaging with Marilyn Frye’s “birdcage” paradigm of oppression, specifically, her argument that there are oppressors, and that their suppositions for reverse oppression, whatever they may be, do not count as oppression.
Frye’s argument involves unearthing the distinction between oppression and racism, on the one hand, and day-to-day instances of discrimination or prejudice, on the other. That is, everyone, to some degree, experiences certain kinds of limitations and frustrations, which is why
Frye posits, it is imperative to first differentiate which limitations and harms are elements of oppression, and which are not. To do this, Frye says

Get Access