preview

Black Lives Matter Dbq

Decent Essays

In the year 1765, a well acclaimed group arose when the British enforced the Stamp Act. The Stamp Act was a law geared toward the American colonist to pay taxes on paper goods due to the French and Indian War. There were some colonist who believed that there should be no taxation without representation and they called themselves the Sons of Liberty. They believed themselves as patriots fighting for their rights but I view them as terrorist. They are terrorist because they condoned looting, vandalism, the tarring and feathering of people and most of all making terroristic threats, which are all characteristics of a terrorist group. On the other hand, the protest group Black Lives Matter which started from a social media post in 2012 due to an …show more content…

12). With violence comes fear and that is what they instilled in the hearts of the Britain’s and their loyalists who lived in the colonies. For example, in April, 1765, the Governor of New York expected to get a shipment of paper goods. Once the Governor found out that the Sons of Liberty knew about the shipment he locked himself inside Fort George because he was scared for his life. The Governor had every right to be scared, seeming as though the Sons of Liberty arrived at his house after he received his package and proceeded to burn his transportation. The angry mob then set their sights on a commander at Fort George and began to loot and vandalize his house. They did all of that destruction in the name of what? “Patriotism”? I think not. The Sons of Liberty were murderous bullies who tarred and feathered people who were loyal to Britain, the act of tarring someone is terroristic enough. A patriot fights for what they believe in yes, but not to the extent of killing people before they exhausted all peaceful options. The Sons of Liberty even had, “cooperation with undisciplined and extralegal groups to set off violent actions” (Kramer par. 15). I mean, come on! They used outside help to instill fear so they could get their point …show more content…

BLM is different because they want “a civil rights movement-type of change that shakes up politics and breaks the cycle of violence and silence” (Sider, Simon, par. 8). Unlike the Sons of Liberty, the Black Lives Matter movement does not condone violence especially on innocents. Yes, as a group they had some mishaps with a few radicals, but they are learning from their mistakes and are trying to weed out the people who will tarnish what the movement is about. Not like the Sons of Liberty who condoned and outsourced violent criminals. The Black Lives Matters movement tries to make change legally like having a sit in at a police station until the officers released a shooting tape in a case of an officer killing a black male. Although violence tried to arise due to tempers the group did not give in to mob mentality. They did not drag the officers out of the department and tar them, nor did they vandalize the building. Since they did things the peaceful way the case is now being looked into, and the officers who were involved in the shooting are now on leave. The protest group is also delving more into politics, the group wants the Black voice to be heard on a more intellectual

Get Access