preview

Black Power By Stokely Carmichael

Good Essays

Almost fifty years ago members of the Black Panther Party, carrying shotguns and rifles, marched into the California State Capitol to protest the Mumford Bill, which would soon severely restrict their right to carry around these weapons. Months before this show de force, which would soon become one of the most famous historical depictions of the Black Power era, reporters and government agents had already began to follow each and every step of Stokely Carmichael, chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordination Committee. Carmichael, who had popularized the slogan “Black Power” in mid-June of 1966, polarized the nation. The media, which largely portrayed him as an irresponsible proponent of violence over his failure to distance himself from …show more content…

Beginning with his well-planned call for “Black Power” in Greensboro in June 1966, Carmichael faced tremendous, oftentimes unjustified criticism and denunciations. As such, it is not surprising that some of the historical research over the last decade was more concerned with resurrecting him as a historical persona than it was with critically assessing his ideological transformation. While most of the contemporary public condemnations were from the onset on more concerned with repudiating than understanding Carmichael’s ideas about Black Power, the concept, as defined by him in form of several short articles in 1966, and one year later further elaborated in Black Power: The Politics of Liberation in America, the book he coauthored with Charles Hamilton. While few contemporary critics of the book engaged with the authors’ discussion of the consequences and the limits of gradual civil rights reforms, most found easy fault with the findings of the book or what they perceived of a lack of practically informed advice that could turn Black Power into a viable strategy. While broadly identified by scholars, until now, this disregard for Carmichael’s definition of the term Black …show more content…

Recent scholarship has challenged this notion by scrutinizing the high level of racial discrimination and segregation that existed in the city despite the lack of codified Jim Crow legislation. Hence, an examination of the patterns that shaped the reactions to Carmichael’s visit, especially those of the local racial etiquette, which might have been compounded by the fact that Nashville is the capital of Tennessee, will contribute to our understanding of the local framing of the Black liberation struggle in the later half of the 1960s. Moreover, scholars have shown that the outsider theme has been a common and popular notion in regulating and reinforcing the racial status quo in Nashville and in other place around the nation. Hence, an examination of the complex nature of local opposition to Black Power has the potential to increase our understanding about the exploits of the resistance to Carmichael’s presence in Music City. Contrary to what most of the literature on the Black Power movement suggests, the radicals’ criticism cannot be reduced to a contestation and negation of the legitimacy of prominent civil rights leadership or White society, it also entailed a condemnation of the power structure and the lack of solidarity within the Black community.

Get Access