Blindsight and Qualities of Visual Perception
ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper is to defend a broad concept of visual perception, according to which it is a sufficient condition for visual perception that subjects receive visual information in a way which enables them to give reliably correct answers about the objects presented to them. According to this view, blindsight, non-epistemic seeing, and conscious visual experience count as proper types of visual perception. This leads to two consequences concerning the role of the phenomenal qualities of visual experiences. First, phenomenal qualities are not necessary in order to see something, because in the case of blindsight, subjects can see objects without experiences phenomenal
…show more content…
Concerning the role of the phenomenal qualities for seeing particularly the following two questions are of importance:
(1) The first question is dealing with the causal or functional role of phenomenal qualities: Under the assumption that seeing is based on cortical information-processing, the question arises, whether the phenomenal qualities of visual perceptions have a function with regard to this processing, in the sense that the intentional content of visual perceptions depends not only on their intentional, but also on their phenomenal qualities. Is it true, as among other authors Frank Jackson and Steven Pinker claim, that phenomenal qualities are only epiphenomena, not having any function for information-processing? (1)
(2) The second question concerns the status of phenomenal qualities: Are the phenomenal qualities of visual perceptions non-intentional qualities, or do they belong to a certain type of intentional qualities? In other words, are phenomenal and intentional contents essentially different, or are the so-called phenomenal contents of visual perceptions really part of their intentional contents?
In order to come to a decision concerning these two questions, several authors, among them Peter Carruthers, Daniel Dennett, Colin McGinn, Nicholas Humphrey and Robert VanGulick, refer to an empirical phenomenon called "blindsight". (2)
Until, it was brought to her attention, she had no idea that she was only drawing half of the picture. This gives us evidence that there is not only a sensory problem, but a problem of consciousness. With 30 areas in the brain for seeing, visual input divides into two parallel streams of processing. One called the How pathway, is concerned with navigation and the other called the “What” pathway is concerned with recognition.
Then, how human perceive became a complex question. Through general classification, the way human perceive can be objective or subjective. Written by Ken Robinson, the book Out of Our Minds have discussed the relationship between objectivity and subjectivity in creating perception (Robinson 167-196). When we create perception, objectivity or subjectivity cannot solely exist. They involve each other through the whole process of creating perception, and combine to form a natural way of perception.
Throughout the novel Invisible Man, Ralph Ellison works with many different images of blindness and impaired vision and how it relates to perception. These images prove to be fascinating pieces of symbolism that enhance the themes of impression and vision within the novel. From the beginning of the novel when the narrator is blindfolded during the battle royal to the end where Brother Jack's false eye pops out, images of sight and blindness add to the meaning of many scenes and characters. In many of these situations the characters inability to see outwardly often directly parallels their inability to perceive inwardly what is going on in the world around them. Characters like Homer A. Barbee and Brother Jack believe they are all knowing
Question 1 1 out of 1 points Correct Perception can be influenced by our wishes. Answer Correct Answer: True
on this, the ability of seeing must can be viewed situationally. For example, a sighted person can
These senses are the avenues by which the stimuli around us can be absorbed and translated into our perception. However, certain characteristics of sense perception as a basis for attaining knowledge about our reality can raise problems. This is because it is subjective and relative; it varies with condition and can be external to the object perceived.
Sight is perhaps the easiest deceived of all the senses as it cannot comprehend error. The human eye is unable to perceive the intangible, leading to false judgement based on appearances alone. However, this fault can be overcome when reliance on sight becomes less prevalent.
What does it mean to ‘read the visual’? What do you understand by the term ‘visuality’? Using a photograph or single image, explore the relationship between seeing and being, as it applies to visual phenomena. Include a copy of the image.
Two observers viewing the same object at the same position under the same physical circumstances do not necessarily have identical visual experience. Although the images on our retinas form part of the cause of what we see, another very important part of the cause is the inner state of our minds or brains, which will itself depend on our cultural upbring, our knowledge and our expectations, and will not be determined solely by the physical properties of our eyes and the scene
Assumptions and beliefs have the potential to be the most impactual factor in a human's reality without them even realizing it. Indirect realist believe sensory perceptions is a combination of previously stored information about the world, which is built as a result of experience as well as information in the stimuli (McLeod). On the contrary, direct realists believe assumptions and beliefs do not have an impact on sense perception because perception is purely based on an external object that is independent of a perceiver's awareness of it (BonJour). I believe that one's sense perception is not a direct process and that our assumptions and beliefs play a major role in sense perception by filtering, thus impacting our perception of the external
I have always been fascinated by the incredible power the human mind possesses over what the eyes behold. Somewhere among the thousands of synapses, the brain sometimes deciphers quite incorrectly what the eyes have actually
Visual perception is the ability to process and organize visual information from the environment. A reoccurring theme throughout history is the study of perception the time of the ancient Greek has been whether perceptual processes are learned or inherited. Greek philosophers have a systematic thought on perception in the sources of human knowledge. Many researchers and theoreticians in perception discussed below have historically been the subject of much research and how they pose continuing challenges. Optical illusion is a perception that is not true to reality, having been altered subjectively in some way in the mind of the perceiver (Collins Dictionary). For things like optical illusions, forced perception, and blindness pose problems with visual perspectives. Optical Illusions were first created by Epicharmus, a Greek philosopher and Protagorus, also another Greek philosopher in 450 B.C.
Gestalt approach emphasizes that we perceive a well-organized, whole structures rather than as separated, isolated parts. He developed number of principles that described how objects were grouped, such as law of good continuation, of proximity, and of similarity (Edward, 2014). Building on from Gestalt theories, Gibsonian approach emphasizes that our perceptions are rich and elaborate because the stimuli in our environment are rich with information, rather than because our thought processes or experiences provide that richness; and he categorized this approach as indirect and direct perception approach (Edward, 2014). There were many drawbacks of these theories, which leads to many researchers interested in coming up with the best explanations and best model to measure how perception process.
This experiments looks at the relationship between repetition and the belief in Extrasensory Perception (ESP). People who believe in ESP are referred to as ‘sheep’ and those who do not are referred to as ‘goats’. This is the sheep-goat effect. The sheep are more likely to avoid giving repetitions than the goats that have a low belief in ESP. A total of one hundred and eighty five participants took part in this study by imagining that they had a dice that they had to roll. They had to provide the experimenter with an imaginary number between one and six which would be repeated and recorded a total of 67 times. Once this had been completed a questionnaire was given in which they had to rate their belief in ESP on a scale of one (strong belief) and six (strong disbelief). In order to test the hypothesis, data was collected and then analysed in order to find out the number of repetitions that occurred. This experiment consisted of three groups of people; the sheep, the goats, and those that were indifferent. The results obtained proved our hypothesis as the goats made a larger amount of repetitions than the sheep did.
Gregory proposed that our past experience, knowledge, expectations and motivations can affect how we interpret the visual information we receive, therefore affecting our perception. He suggested that how we see objects is highly brain driven and indirect, and the process takes place so fast that we are unaware of the object in ‘normal perception’; Gregory would say that ‘a perceived object is a hypothesis’.