preview

British Relations And Postcolonial International Relations

Better Essays

Introduction When I first read the syllabus, I viewed the course as being divided into two distinct units: feminist international relations and postcolonial international relations. Over the course of the semester, I realized that my main takeaway was that these two theoretical frameworks were more related than I initially realized. Reading this line of Orientalism and War put the pieces together for me: “While the ‘war on terror’ may be unimaginable without orientalism, it would seem that orientalism is also not thinkable without war. In fact, war and the processes of othering it entails, may be more important to orientalism than the Orient…War has been central to the rise and course of the modern state… it is fundamental for gender …show more content…

This helps to absolve us from feeling guilty about the pain we inflict on others, and social psychology shows that the worse you treat a group, the more you hate them (Schopler 1971). Orientalist discourse actively strives to maintain the false distinction of self and other whenever it is challenged, because to realize that the ‘other’ is not all that different from you is to open yourself to the risk of empathizing with their suffering. To help prevent empathy, society fights to maintain a second false binary: the gendered norms of masculine and feminine behavior. To be masculine is to be tough, emotionless, and warlike. To be feminine is to be sensitive to the feelings of others and worry about trivial things like body counts. Praising these masculine traits creates a militaristic society that does not question the human rights abuses of the military and certainly doesn’t worry about the perspective of the enemy. In this paper, I examine the relationship between gender, orientalism, and war, and also explore similarities and differences between authors on these issues. Unfortunately, in many sects of mainstream IR, postcolonial and feminist perspectives are not given the respect they are due. Cynthia Enloe writes about how gender is mostly deemed as irrelevant, and that mainstream IR theorists should “consider thoughtfully when and how their own relationships to masculinity are affecting what they choose to deem a ‘serious’ topic of investigation” (Enloe, 2004: 96).

Get Access