Car To Car Communication Summary

Driving Us to Distraction Summary-Response Paper The essay, ‘Driving us to Distraction’ by Gilbert Cruz is about the dangers of hands-free technology while driving. The author argues that while driving and talking on a cell phone is deadly, using hands-free technology is not that much better of a choice. He supports his argument by citing a 2003 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration study that found cellphone use to be a serious hazard on the road and by mentioning a series of simulator tests conducted in 2007 by a psychology professor at the University of Utah named David Strayer.

In the article “How The Brain Reacts” by Marcel Just and Tim Keller, the authors describe how they use science to show the brains reaction to what is happening around it when on the road. “Behavioral studies have shown that talking on a cellphone diverts the driver’s attention and disrupts driving performance.” They

Distracted driving is becoming the one of the highest causes of fatal accidents in youth. People are becoming more and more dependent on their mobile phones due to the economic and social benefits they provide. With advancement of technology and the more widespread use of smartphones distracted driving is become more dangerous than driving impaired. Driving itself needs full focus and attention with new technologies more focused on making mobile phones more easily compatible with cars it has become increasingly difficult to eliminate the problem cell phones and mobile phones cause when linked to each other. Studies show those using mobile devices while driving are 4-6 times more likely to get into a accident, With the risk so high many cell phone use while driving has been banned in many different countries around the world(fatal distractions). The second alternative is hands-free devices allowing drivers to accept calls, compile and send text messages with ought the use of hands, but using a mobile phone whether it be hands-free or not still hinders performance and deviates the focus of the driver. Car companies have recently countered this issue by implementing new technology in vehicles. For instance, cars now come equipped with built in blue tooth and exceptional pairing applications. This technology leads to inconclusive results of using a hand-held device.

First driverless cars are much less likely to crash. In fact “The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that between 93 percent and 95 percent of car accidents are caused by human error” (par. 5, Tribune). This study displays

In a real traffic situation, 15 subjects were tested when performing different tasks using a Driver Information System (DIS).There are 8 various classes in driving. The results can be seen in the above figure 2.3.

In this article, Peters and Peters discuses about the risk of multitasking while driving. Not only they propose a problem, but also tries to give the reader an alternative ways of preventing the cause of an accident. He gives us three-risk factors that can reduce the chances of getting into an accident. They suggest having a printed and audible warning to warn the drivers not to use the device unless the vehicle is not moving, an integrated system “which all device are either shut off or out of driver’s sight when the vehicle is in motion” and finally, “ marketing and dealer restraint”. If these warnings are available in the vehicle, there should be a less chance to be distracted and cause an accident and also, this can be useful thing to create in the vehicle to remind the driver not to multitask while

As a kid being able to drive is a point in our life that we can 't wait to reach. It feel like it’s a new chapter of freedom especially as teenager ranging from 16-18 years old. With the technology astronomically growing day by day our cell phones are becoming a huge distraction when driving. Drivers are putting themselves in hazardous danger, and not just them, but others surrounding them. Being able to drive could go from having a great time to a nightmare within a split of a second by looking down to a “What are you doing?”.

However, this is not the only reason drivers are distracted. A few examples of distraction could be anything from changing the song on the stereo, setting up the GPS, or setting up the Bluetooth headset to answer calls. The Majority of Car manufactures are putting high resolution big screens with the ability to navigate the web, and an increasing amount of features. The demand for greater technology can increase the risks of driving since they will be using the touch-screens to navigate through the system (Vance). Although most companies pride themselves with safety they ignore the hazards of increasing technology

Despite an effective way of communication, using cell phones during driving results in the distracted attention of driver increasing road safety concerns.

In reading article “Are Integrated Devices Safer than Using Handheld Devices While Driving?” the author, Mitch Bainwol reasons why integrated devices are safer for drivers to use than handheld devices are. Mitch Bainwol stands by the idea that the integrated systems placed in cars are much safer for automobile drivers while on the road because it could help eliminate a lot of the car accidents on the road. Mr. Bainwol’s backs up his point of view by providing statistics from research data and comparing the integrated systems against the use of cell phones when driving to convince readers that using technology that is already built in the cars makes the driver safer. The author’s finding from his research verifies that 80 percent of automobile

My cars talk to one another. I have no doubt about it anymore. It's as though they've gained confidence; as though they're not bothering to keep it secret anymore. Their engines rattle and knock continuously. (Asimov # 15) In “Google achieves milestone in driverless car technology development” it shows how car and talk to each other. ” Vehicle-to-vehicle communication is considered an essential building block toward driverless vehicles” (Halsey and Laris) This two stories tell that this driverless cars can have conversation with each

One such device is Apple’s CarPlay, which is an advanced display dashboard console that presents a large, focused view of information, such as GPS or speech to text. (Huynh 1). As with other hands-free devices, the driver’s mind and eyes are still taken off the road, which increases the risk of distraction. Technology companies have not just limited themselves to devices; also creating applications that can be installed on users cellphones. One application, called SafeRide, locks down the user’s cellphone while the vehicle is in motion (“SafeRide”). However, the app has remained unnoticed and relies on a somewhat delayed Bluetooth connection between the cellphone and vehicle, and the contents of the cellphone can still be accessed with a hands-free device. Perhaps the most advanced technological development is software that allows for autonomous vehicles. Car company Telsa has created two add-ons for its vehicle lineup, Enhanced Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability, both of which use sensors and cameras to survey the landscape surrounding the vehicle in order to make decisions on the road (“Telsa”). Not all the flaws have been ironed out, as evidenced by a fatal car crash in May 2016, where a Telsa vehicle collided with a semi-truck (Simonite). Although the safest solution to using hands-free devices is to not use any device and just focus on the

In newer car models, built in systems allow for calls and messages to be sent and received in a safe manner. These systems are designed to keep drivers focused while still able to communicate. “These devices enable messages to be read aloud and drivers can speak responses” (Barth 1). Despite these reasons, it can be argued that these built-in features are more of a hindrance than an assistance. Technology in cars requires more attention and can cause frustration as Bluetooth may not recognize your phone or understand your speech. “ In a recent article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, they argue that the best solution to help prevent more deaths is to have vehicle and/or cell-phone manufacturers render a handheld device inoperable whenever it's in a moving car” (Consumer Reports

It must be noted that cars are dangerous vehicles which can cause fatal damage. Individuals responsible for a vehicle are expected to be more alert than pedestrians walking down the street or crossing the road, this is known as “destructive disparity”. This

‘Hands Free Technology Does Not Keep Drivers Safe’ is an article written by Robert Rosenberger. In his article, Rosenberger accentuates, as the title suggests, that hands free technologies are not as safe as they are thought to be. Rosenberger is a philosophy professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology. His style of teaching is through a philosophical theory approach, where he engages and questions his students frequently. Furthermore, Rosenberger is an Editor for a plethora of books such as the ‘Philosophy of Science: 5 Questions (Georgia Tech, 2016).’ Overall, the article is effective in conveying his message through the use of deductive reasoning, support strategies, tone and organization.