Case Analysis Of Under Armour

It should be noted that Under Armour and its competitors form a segment of the Apparel Clothing market geared toward recreational and formal athletics. Under Armour, and its main competitors of Columbia Sportswear and Nike, are recognizible and prestigious brand names in the United States and in many other countries, yet affordable, to an extent, to most middle class Americans. They are popular among teenagers and young adults, and also worn by practical middle aged people and senior citizens. The desirability, versatility, and practicality of these items are intrinsic to the companies and help lead to their success. Specific practical yet luxurious products are offered, such as shirts and pants for running, that help the runner in either too hot or too cold climates. With more and more people trying to exercise for health, beauty, athletic, and other reasons, these types of products are in demand. It seems that there are some Niche markets, and unique products, among each of Under Amour and its competitors, so there is not much threat between the different brands. Also, some recreational and formal athletes would purchase all three brands of items. The industry is considered to be a growth industry, but also somewhat mature as all the brand names are recognized. The following article explains how the author, at the end of 2014, considered Under Armour to be “a great growth stock” http://investorplace.com/2014/12/under-armour-inc-ua-stock-growth/ (Navellier

Financial-Under Armour is a publicly traded company on the NYSE. Results from the fourth quarter, ending December 31, 2011, shows that net revenues increased 34% to $403 million, $102 million more than

Competitors in the industry can wreak havoc on the bottom line for a company. With rivals, a price competition usually ensues, which benefits the customers but hurts the competing businesses that share a common strategy. In reviewing rival sellers, many competitors exist within the sports apparel and footwear industry, but most of them are unable to compete with the industry giants, Nike and Adidas. They are well seated in the industry and their sales reveal this ultimate strength, however, Under Armour is putting pressure on these mammoths. In 2015, global sales of sports clothing and footwear equated to $250 billion, of which Nike grabbed $30.6 billion, Adidas held in its grasp $18.8 billion and Under Armour had a much smaller piece of the pie, at $3.9 billion globally. In reviewing these numbers, it looks like Under Armour is really subpar to the industry giants, but this is not exactly the case. Under Armour in the past couple of

Under Armour’s success transcends to its financial stability. Based Under Armour’s fourth quarter report, the apparel company expects 2016 net revenues of approximately $4.95 billion, representing growth of 25% over 2015 and 2016

Kevin Plank, the founder of Under Armour sports apparel line is a brilliant businessman. This former college football player started making work-out T-shirts from his grandmother’s basement; seventeen years later, the company is generating billions of dollars in revenue. Kevin Plank has created a brand that is more than just a fancy success story. The Under Armour’s mission in the sporting goods industry is to “make all athletes better through passion, design, and the relentless pursuit of innovation (Thompson, 2014, C-53).” This company is more than just a fancy success story. VIRO Analysis reported, Under Armour has been growing its revenue at a rate of +20% for 5 consecutive years, which is extremely impressive. The company’s financial

Under Armour has proven year over year that they are indeed a growth company. As their brand recognition and product availability increases so do their revenues. Under Armour achieved a growth in net revenue by over 18 percent, increased net income by 22 percent (suggesting financial discipline) all leading to their ability to sustain growth year over year (Under Armour 10K, 2009). This considerable increase in net revenue is attributed to an increase in apparel and the introduction of footwear in the first quarter of 2009 (2009). Although Under Armour has only been around 14 years they have only been traded publicly since 2005 (2009).

Under Armour is a very famous sportswear company in the world. It sold products in three categories: apparel, footwear, and accessories. It had a wide variety of innerwear and outerwear in the apparel segment, a broad line of footwear, and a line of accessories for both men and women. Kevin A. Plank, the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Under Armour (UA), was a walk-on special team’s player for University of Maryland football team. As an athlete, he knew what kind of sportswear material would be popular for athletes. Under Armour created a new category of sports apparel: “performance apparel” which focused on the athlete’s performance. In this segment, it had a 78% market in 2009. Because, it paid more attentions on quality, performance

Under Armour’s (UA) current CEO Kevin Kant founded the company in 1996, which has witnessed the company grow in recent years to become a key player in the sporting gear and apparel industry. UA focuses its products and marketing efforts towards the youth, men, and women. The amount of resources that are allocated to each group of customers differs in that initially, UA primary source of revenue was from men even if youth and women products were also produced and sold. The specificity of UA’s products and their sporting activities selectivity can be attributed to UA’s limited global market share in the sporting gear and apparel industry. The company’s mission statement is inspiring, but in order to gain competitive advantages against larger

Most of Under Armour's sales were in North America they have reached 90 percent, even the international sales were growing by retailers. The company growth strategy are continuing broaden the company's product, increasing its breakthrough of the market for athletic footwear, expand their sales on foreign countries and growing global awareness.

It is anticipated that in the coming months, the organization will earn a 4% increase in the share prices. Moreover, in the coming quarters, it is expected that the company will have an increase in the value of the stocks with a staggering $4.02 billion in revenues. As at the end of the year, it is expected that the organization will earn $1.22 per share, up 16%, while revenue of $4.98 billion would mark a decline of 25.7% from the year-ago quarter. Such a significant growth is attributed to the increased sales for its footwear. Most of the sporting teams such as the National Basketball Association (NBA) has had Under Armour as their preferred supplier for its sporting utilities. As

Under Armour is in the Textile- Apparel Clothing industry, in the consumer goods sector. The market has been driven by economic recovery, new product offerings and a

1. We chose to study Under Armour because of their explosive growth over the last five years in a very competitive industry. From a marketing standpoint, it is quite apparent that the company is doing well and one could assume that because the firm appears to have had great success in aggressively expanding their market share, they are by extension creating value for investors. By studying the financial information, we aimed to confirm or deny whether Under Armour is indeed creating value.

At first I thought that Under Armor would be an exception to this but then I realized that they don’t have exclusive deals with the manufacturers that they acquire their fabrics from to make their products. Therefore if one of its rivals ever wanted to they could possible acquire some of the innovative fabric that Under Armour uses and then use the fabric you produce similar products.

The corporate tax rate has just decreased from 35% to 21% which is good news for UA but not as much as companies that do more business in the US and also for a company that has significantly less debt than the highly leveraged Under Armour has (The Economist, 2018). Social factors are quite important for the retail industry and in 2017 a large demographic for clothing sales, teens, spent less overall and claimed Under Armour a brand they did not wear and athleisure in general to not be preferred attire anymore (Reagan, 2017). Thus, Under Armour’s demographics changed just in the last year with teenagers claiming to not be wearers of the brand, and also the trend of athleisure coming to an end. Technology is an external environmental factor that affects Under Armour, but not as much its competitors in the industry. When fitness bands were introduced the company also came out with their own line of bands that proved unsuccessful and were discontinued (Booton, 2017). Under Armour maintained their fitness apps however and they are able to have an edge over their competitors by having all of this information

Under Armour is currently one of the leading companies in the sports apparel industry whose mission is to “Make all athletes better through passion, science, and the relentless pursuit of innovation”.1 When Under Armour first broke into the sports apparel industry it was a disruptive pioneer that initially made the two giants, Nike and Adidas, a little weary. Under Armour revolutionized the sports apparel industry by creating apparel that used synthetic materials as an alternative to natural fibers, such as cotton, or other materials, such as polyester. This all-important switch to these materials resulted in a 2“shirt that provided compression and wicked perspiration off your skin rather than absorb it. A