Diapers with Love
I would like to announce the merger of Daffy Diapers and Snuggles Diapers. With the merger, the name of the company will now be Diapers with Love. The merging of the two companies is an opportunity to improve our quality, total sales, reduce employee turnover, and to increase profits. Both plants will remain open, with no plans to close either facility in the future. The current plan for the merger does not entail any layoffs on the shop floor; the plan is to increase the headcount for the company’s current production needs and for future targets that are in the planning stages. There will be some reorganizing of office personnel. However, there will be opportunities in other organizations within the company for those involved in the reorganization to apply.
The central plant will be in Hiccup, MO where the sales team, research and development, and central office personnel will all locate. The plant in Nowhere, OK is located 45 miles from the Hiccup plant and will have the essential office personnel in that facility to support business and employee’s needs.
…show more content…
The key finding was the gross/profit margin for the merged company. The findings showed the current gross/profit margin for the new company is currently 6.25% in combining both facilities revenue and cost of goods sold. The goals for the system level team is to increase the gross/profit margin to 23% over the next year. To reach the goals, Graham et al. (2015) describes the use of a balanced scorecard to enable individuals or groups to understand how they contribute to the overall strategies of the business. The team leading the implementation plan for performance improvements selected four of the six areas of the scorecard to work from to benefit the systems, process, and job/performer levels in finding the areas for
“The balanced scorecard should translate a business unit’s mission and strategy into tangible objectives and measures. The measures represent a balance between external measures for shareholders and customers and internal measures of critical business processes, innovation and learning and growth. The measures are balance between outcome measures, the results of past efforts, and the measures that drive future performance. And the scorecard is balanced between objective, easily quantified outcome measures and subjective, somewhat judgmental, performance…”
A balanced scorecard is a tool to provide management a way to bridge the gap between the organization’s strategy and vision and the operational processes used to do business. It enables the company to look at more than just the financial targets, but to include nonfinancial measures such as customer service, internal business processes and more. These intangible measures provide better focus on the organization’s long-term strategies. This paper is an attempt to analyze Frieda Fizz decision to utilize a balanced scorecard as they expand into new geographic areas. The strengths and weaknesses of each perspective are discussed along with the pros and cons of using
Many challenges occur when a merger occurs; especially when it occurs among competitors merge two different organizations into one facility per se disrupts the operation and functionality on all levels involved within the organization. During this transaction, it is an opportunity to combine many knowledgeable individuals, introduce new styles of performing tasks, and introduce different styles of performance.
A Balanced Scorecard can be defined as a “performance management tool which began as a concept for measuring whether the smaller-scale operational activities of a company are aligned with its larger-scale objectives in terms of vision and strategy” (Wikipedia 2009, ¶ 1). Scents & Things will need to develop a balanced scorecard that will assist in meeting and help define the company’s values, mission, vision, and SWOT analysis. The balance scorecard is made up of four perspectives; financial, customer, learning and growing, and internal process. This paper will define each of the four perspectives objectives, performance measures, targets, and initiatives. The paper will also show how the perspectives relate
The balanced scorecard (BSC) is fundamentally a customized performance measurement system that looks beyond traditional financial measures and is based on organization strategy. This paper discusses fundamental concepts in developing performance metrics, provides an overview of issues in developing balanced scorecard measures, and gives numerous illustrations of performance measures. As shown later, the BSC is an active area of research within the medical community. However, previous research does not report on the fundamental linkages between hospital inputs, outputs, and the creation of performance metrics. In addition, these articles provide few specific examples of balanced scorecard measures and illustrations of how the balanced scorecard translates action into improved performance.
Since an organization is composed of multiple levels, a scorecard must support different levels and perspectives from strategic business units and divisions, to departments, teams and individuals. To accommodate this architecture, the scorecard is structured as multiple, aggregated cubes. Each layer a nesting of the ones below. In general, the highest level cube defines the measures and dimensions that apply to the corporate level, and these drill through to divisional and departmental cubes that have a more detailed level of information (Nickols, 1999). This “artery” of the cubes lets the strategy communicate down the organization, while performance is aggregated up through the organization like blood through vein.
The use of balanced scorecard has been developed from the early use as a simple performance measurement framework, a complete strategic planning and management systems. The "new"
To make the balance scorecard accurate, the organizational management team in lines the mission, vision, and strategy of the company into the scorecard. “This depicts the long term and short term success of the strategy. The outcome measures of the balanced scorecard must represent the excellent prior performance and the performance-drivers that lead to the successful and accurate performance.” (Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P.
Balanced Scorecard is a strategic performance management framework that helps organizations to align strategies with both financial and non-financial measures to monitor progress, measure performance, prioritize and reveal improvement opportunities (Henderson, Gary & Mittl). BSC is generally implemented at the corporate level, but it is useful for all levels of the organization. It should not only act as an information system for corporate management, but form a basis for encouraging behavioral change in the organization in order to conform to the vision and
Kaplan and Norton (1996c) defined Balanced Scorecard as a framework that helps organizations translates strategy into operational objectives that drive both behaviour and performance. They realized that although traditional financial performance measures worked well for the industrial era, but were proving to be insufficient in measuring the abilities and competencies essential for survival in changing economic environment. Traditional performance indicators tend to measure financial and accounting aspects, impacting long-term productivity and profits, whereas, Balanced Scorecard provides the measures of synthetic indicators which companies should focus on, such as customer reactions, profits, quality and flexible production selection (Martin,
This report outlines the what the balanced scorecard is and how it is used as a tool used in the business industry. It outlines its historical development and analyses its usefulness and how it can be applied to key decisions.
The goal of this essay is to focus on theory and implementation of the Balanced Scorecard system. Because of the structured generic approach of the methodology, the Balanced Scorecard has gained its popularity as means of evaluating performance and reporting quantitative performance results. The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system that is used extensively in business and industry, government, and nonprofit organizations worldwide to align business activities to the vision and strategy of the organization, improve internal and external communications, and monitor organization performance against strategic goals (The Balanced Scorecard Institute, 2014). The Balanced Scorecard is the most prevalent and adopted of the several strategic performance tools since the early 1990s. In addition, the derivatives of the Balanced Scorecard such as Performance Prism and Results Based Management have also gained prominence in the field of strategic performance management and improvement. The Balanced Scorecard commenced as a performance management tool that incorporated strategic non-financial performance measures to the conventional financial indicators in order to provide managers and company executives with a somewhat “balanced” view of the aspect of organizational performance.
The balanced scorecard (BSC) is an extensively used performance measurement tool introduced to take the strategy and vision of the business into real action from four perspectives: financial, customers, internally progress and learning and grow. (Kaplan and Norton, 1996) From all these four perspectives, it can be seen that this measurement tool is different from others because it concentrates on both financial and operational information rather than only financial figures which make the tool provide a more comprehensive of the business to shareholders and customers. In these years, BSC has developed from the performance measurement tool to a strategic management system. ( Kaplan and Norton, 1996, p 37) However, this essay aims at introducing the balanced scorecard as a performance measurement from its origins, why business needs it, how it can be utilized, how the business can get benefits from adopting this measurement tool and what potential problems and limits it has.
The Balanced Scorecard has emerged in recent years as a performance measurement system in various organizations. This paper will discuss the origin and concept of the balanced scorecard and how it was first implemented. We will then review the criticisms on the balanced scorecard methodology as well as analyse the strengths and weaknesses of this performance measurement tool.
© 2003 2GC Ltd. All rights reserved. This document is protected under copyright by 2GC Ltd. The following terms and conditions apply to its use: Photocopying - single photocopies may be made for personal use as allowed by national copyright laws. Permission from 2GC and payment of a fee is required for all other photocopying, including multiple or systematic copying, copying for advertising or promotional purposes, resale, and all forms of document delivery; Derivative Works – Permission from 2GC is required for all derivative works, including compilations and