Case Study: Pavshyk

Satisfactory Essays

Reason for Investigation: On July 18, 2017 Hudson’s Bay Asset Protection received a tip that PAVSHYK had merchandise in alternations that had not been purchased. Investigative Support/Findings: Further investigation found that PAVSHYK had removed 8 items from the room without knowledge of management. PAVSHYK delivered all 8 items to the alternations department under the assumption that PAVSHYK had purchased these items. Management went through PAVSHYK’s personal receipts and found that PAVSHYK’s receipts did not match the 8 items being altered. PAVSHYK stated to management that the 8 items were for personal use and that they had not been purchased. Summary of Interview: On July 20, 2017 Internal Coordinator Marc YOUNAN interviewed PAVSHYK

Get Access