Case Study on the Detrimental Effects of Major Internal Decision

There are somewhat restrictions on the kinds of advice be given? On that note, should the mayor on the political consequences be personal if he assumes leadership of the income tax campaign? Additionally, it may be the time they were starting to arrive a decision to raise probably taxes or cut services more drastically.

5. What reports will CitySoft need to make those one-time decisions and decisions it will have to make on an on-going basis (in Question #2)?  Who should prepare those reports, who should have access to these reports, and how frequently should they be prepared?

The City of Whittier has two city meetings a month were the people of the community are welcome to attend. One of their city council meetings was held on April 26 at 6:30pm. The council members are Owner Newcomer, Cathy Warner and Bob Henderson. The Mayor Pro tem is Joe Vinatieri and the Mayor of Whittier is Fernando Dutra. There was a good amount of public attendance, but the attendance died out after recess. Public participation was not effective or really used throughout the meeting. The public comments part of the meeting was where the public’s voice was most heard.

FCB’s financial success was limited since “the Control Board implemented to resolve the city’s crisis was not designed to address each of these root causes equally” (Kobes 2008, p.259). While it altered D.C.’s standing on the market and improved its standing with Congress, “the fiscal crisis did not spur residents to resolve local democracy failures. Rather, no major reforms in the basic structure of the District government were enacted beyond the public schools” (Kobes 2008, p.256). In 2011, a D.C. Council member stated that “it (FCB) was able to do some things that needed to be done, that, politically, I would not do…” (DeBonis 2011). Additionally, different officials refer to the FCB as the “most humiliating episode in the city’s 36-year home rule” (DeBonis 2011). In terms of the initial hypothesis, while the D.C. FCB reformed the legal structure of its jurisdiction, the fact that it failed to incorporate citizen participation and the evolving social factors serves as an example of an FCB that was not highly efficient. Despite changing the legal framework, several issues such as taxation were left unresolved, which serves to show that the issues not addressed by the Revitalization Act are currently affecting D.C. Thus, while it was effective in stabilizing the economy, failing to address other factors might put D.C. at risk of financial crisis once

However, as the mayor was self - obsessed and corrupt, they decided to expose him. This decision expresses that the citizens need a better leader. And might help in the improvement of the

The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively compare and contrast the implementation of two types of mayor-council government systems which are that of the weak-mayor type of the mayor council system and the strong-mayor type of the mayor council system. The premise of the analysis which has been conducted in this paper is based upon assessing the local governments of two cities within the United States – Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Minneapolis, Minnesota which follow the adoption of a strong-mayor system and weak-mayor system respectively.

Council members are reduced to puppets free from public engagement and the Mayor, a celebrity hosting the City Manager/CEO/Ringmaster of a horse and pony circus. The fault lies within the public who is lazy and leave responsibility to a few whom they elect., In sum, the reader astute and informed to acknowledge the scheme of avoiding a vote to secure a fire tax. Now, why would the city be so kind to offer us a Sacred Canaopy to police knowing after the show? The plan to exit police is at hand and deceitful language hides that pertinent fact. Our current charter protected fire, and we know what happened? What difference would a reform embrace? The city spat on the charter and history has a tendency to repeat. The polished silvery tongue wants you to believe our cops are safe. The Charter Reform is the final solution to be led by a Fuhrer imposed by political will who kicks the citizens and cops to the curb. I don't look forward to a police tax, a Futhrer, and shivering my hard-earned dollar to line silk suits and Rollex watches. ( I

There are numerous techniques the mayor can use to create effective teamwork among city employees one of which is an atmosphere of accountability and trust as a common goal. The American Management Association (2014) stated, “When people work together in a climate of trust and responsibility toward a common goal, they put aside turf issues and politics and focus on the tasks to be done. This

decisions regarding the island community. Decisions are made by majority vote of the council. The

elected separately from the council, and is often a full-time and paid position with a significant administrative and budgetary authority. This form of government, the elected City Council sets policies for the operation of the City. The City Council enacts Ordinances, the laws of the City, adopts Resolutions authorizing actions on behalf of the City, reviews plan for development, and establishes the policies by which the City is governed. The City Council consists of seven members a Mayor and two Councilmember 's elected citywide and four additional Councilmember 's elected by individual districts. The administrative responsibility of the City rests with the City Manager, who is appointed by the City Council upon recommendation of the Mayor. Each Councilmember is

Even though the decision-making process was scattered, shared decision making is what was happening. On one issue they were all clear, quick and on the same page. On the other issues discussed they were scattered. There was no one leader of the decision; there were multiple leaders for a discussion at different times. Therefore, as an observer, this was extremely difficult to follow along. Bruno council did follow shared decision-making and a strategic planning approach. Even though they used the majority of the steps, the discussion could have been more formally approached. However, you can take into consideration this council represents a small population. The support for this approach consists of reform-minded policy-makers and leaders, which is hard to come by in a smaller community. These individuals that were sitting at the table are knowledgeable individuals. However, they do not enable the experiences broader sectors do. Even though, Bruno council lacks the broader spectrum, they do practice one of the most important benefits of policy making, shared learning.

From as early on as 1914, there has been tension between the mayor and governor. In 1914 then Mayor John P Mitchell a democrat who became mayor on a “fusion” reversed his prior judgment regarding the construction of Mohansic State Hospital following negative press coverage arguing that it would allow the citizens to drink polluted water. Then Republican governor Charles Whitman reprimanded the governor in public stating that the sewer systems were adequate and that the mayor’s statements were far from the truth. Furthermore in 1917 the governor then reversed his position and sided with Mitchell. Public fears at that time were caused by over exaggeration on both the mayors and governor’s behalf’s.

Previous administrators have failed to address the problems that METRO has overcome over the years. For some reason the saying,

The senior officials of San Jose failed when it came to the disaster that had hit a short time ago. Numerous days leading up to the tragedy, officials had evidence that the water was continuously rising. A better plan should have been implemented in order to minimize the damage as much as possible. Think of it as a company brand; you wouldn't let your business drown when you see evidence of an increasing disaster. The officials of San Jose, their brand is the city of San Jose, and the well being of its residents. Good decision making is essential for management because it shows how the function to solve problems. In the future, they could prevent by making better choices when it comes to available alternatives.

It is advisable to involve as many people as are needed in making a decision. In making collective decisions, specific expertise as well as experience of a person both can be used simultaneously. The decision-maker, having weighed the advice of experts and experienced hands, must then use authority to ensure that the final decision is seen through.