Although i believe is innocnet because theres really no good evidence against him, some may argue he is guilty because he was the ex boyfriend, and the story his friend jay told in court was reasonable and real in court. This reason makes sense the jury believed jay, and some of his story mathced the call logs from adnan phone. This part of the story is when jay told the derectives about that day. The day hae min lee was murdered. A qoute form the story is when say said ‘’he said he was gonna kill her” thats waht jay said in a interview with detectives. This proves he is guilty because the jay story mathced some of the call logs. And he had witnesses who suppoted and were with him. Therefore adnan is guilty because the jury eventually ended
One reason why there is not enough significant evidence to convict Adnan is that fact that Jay’s testimony was very inaccurate. For one thing, each time Jay testifies he lies, and the cops know it. When he was asked by the detective why he lied about where Hae was killed,
Firstly, the Nisha call placed Adnan with Jay after the murder. This call could have been a butt-dial that rang for 2 minutes. The call could have been from Adnan, who wanted to make Jay talk with Nisha. The Nisha call does not prove Adnan killed Hae, as it simply just puts him with Jay at the time. Also, the prosecution stated that Adnan was constantly doing bad things. Everyone does bad things, but it does not make them murderers. Finally, Jay knew the location of Hae’s car. The fact that Jay knew the location of Hae’s car should arouse suspicion on him. The evidence utilized by the prosecution is circumstantial and can be disproved, and the lack of strong evidence proves Adnan’s
Physical evidence was extremely lacking, and all DNA tests conducted were clear of Syed’s DNA. Therefore, it is more than likely that Syed is innocent. The evidence, or lack thereof, presented in the case of Adnan Syed v. State of Maryland proves that Adnan Syed is not guilty of the murder of Hae Min Lee.
Most people don’t think adnan is guilty since there isn’t enough evidence . When you start to look at all the evidence and all the stories that were told it all truly comes back onto adnan. Adnan is guilty for the crime he did because he can’t recall where he was on current day, every speech he has given it falls back on him, and most of all adnan is in every evidence that anyone gives.
Although I believe adnan is guilty because he killed hae, some may argue he is innocent because he was a good kid. This reason makes sense because he volunteers to help the community. This part of the story is when adnan and his friends are going to say all of the good things he did. Most people in the community are saying that he was a great kid but he still did bad stuff in the low. This proves that he is innocent because most people knows adnan and most people are saying he was a good guy.
My verdict is Adnan Syed is innocent of the murder of Hae Min Lee. I reached this verdict after analyzing the evidence and determining that there was a reasonable doubt that he committed the murder. The following pieces of evidence showed he was not linked to the crime: The first piece of evidence talks about the lack of physical proof.
Proving whether or not someone is innocent or guilty is a difficult task. That's why we rely on court hearings, lawyers, judges and unbiased jury members to help decide whether a person is guilty or innocent of crime. In the court of law, Every person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. On January 13th, 1999, Adnan Syed supposedly murdered his 18 year old ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee by manual strangulation. Hae Min Lee’s body was found in Leakin Park located in Baltimore City Maryland. On February 25, 2000 Adnan Syed was sentenced to life in prison plus 30 years, for the murder of Hae Min Lee. During the trial, Jay Wilds testimony became the sole focus of the investigation and eventually the conviction. 15 years later, extensive
A lot of people wonder if Adnan Syed is guilty or innocent, today as a legal assistant I'm going to tell you one important reason why he is innocent. Adnan is not guilty because there is another potential suspect like Jay. Jay's story that "proves" Adnan's guilt, has changed every interview and testimony. Jay had intimate knowledge of the crime he knew things, like if he knew every single thing that Adnan was thinking about which makes everything looked suspicious. Also Jay's stories don't quite match Adnan's cell records.
The motive for this murder, claimed by the state, was that Adnan was upset about the breakup between him and Hae, but this can’t be the case with the evidence given from episode 2 of Serial. “I was like he's a p...I'm trying to conv-- explain I’m seventeen, like ‘He's a player! He has a lot of girls!’ I was like, ‘he's talking to multiple--’ I am too!” (ep. 2). Saad, Adnan’s best friend states that Adnan wasn’t obsessed with Hae and upset at her after the breakup. Yes, of course he was a little down, but he was not outraged at her because it was a mutual breakup. He adds that Adnan had started to see a girl quickly after him and Hae stopped dating. If Adnan had
Adnan Syed is innocent. I believe this because one, everyone says things that don’t make sense or don’t add up. Two, how could Adnan do this if he cared for Hae as much as he says he does? Three, every time it seems like the blame should fall on Adnan, people doubt that he’s not the one to blame. First, Adnan Syed is innocent in my eyes because all of his witnesses say different things and things that don’t add up. For example, almost all of the witnesses said a lot of “he was probably there”, and “from what I can recall”. Next, Adnan cares and wants the best for Hae, so why would he kill her? Adnan stated that he just wanted her to be happy that’s all he cared about, does that sound like a murder to you? Lastly, there’s too much doubt on
I believe that Adnan Syed is innocent for various reasons, for instance, every time Jay would meet with officials, his story would change, and the inconsistences with the cell phone records, for instance, during that time, the two calls placed Adnan Syed to Leakin Park, however, the two calls were incoming and it made it difficult to decide the location. I think that Jay Wilds needs to be observed more and the investigations needs to be re-examined because there are a lot of conflict and contradictions that are misleading. Serial contradicts before and with the law because the justice system didn’t grant the same equal rights to Adnan as they did with Jay. For example, I believe the officials involved in the case didn’t allow Adnan to give
There was nothing linking Adnan to this crime other than a few fingerprints in Hae's car, which isn't a big deal since Adnan and Hae dated and would have obviously spent time together, and Jays word. Some say Jay and Adnan were close friends while others say they were just casual acquaintances. Jay says that on the morning of January 13th him and Adnan went shopping and after he dropped Adnan off at school. Jay says that Adnan then left the car with Jay because he was going to kill Hae and was going to need Jay to pick him up after. Jay says he later received a call from Adnan saying “The bitch is dead, come and get me im at Best Buy.”. Jay says he goes to Best Buy where he is shown the body. Later they drive around and end up at Leakin Park where Adnan burys Hae. Jay says Adnan asked has him if he was going to help bury the body and he says no, but he then says he helped dig the whole. That story that Jay told was the states whole
Overall, these are reasons why I feel that Adnan is innocent. He has not yet actually been proved guilty yet so therefore he is innocent because as the law states, you are innocent until proven
Don’t you feel everyone should receive a fair trial when being accused of a crime? Well, 19 years ago, on January 13, 1999, a boy at Woodland High School in Baltimore named Adnan was accused of manual strangling of a girl named Hae Min Lee. He supposedly told Jay, a buddy of his, that he was going to kill her. After Hae’s missing body was recovered, Jay went to the police and the state used his testimony against Adnan. Recently, a serial podcast was developed by Sarah Koenig, a detective who goes deeper in the case and believes Adnan may be innocent. I think Adnan is innocent because Jay’s story kept altering details and sounds untrustworthy, Adnan had very little time to kill Hae, and because Adnan was at the library during the same time
I agree. P. 143 says, “He was trying to convince himself that he wasn't guilty.” Since so many people are accusing him of being guilty all the evidence thrown against him he's starting to believe in it, but as much as he knows that he stumbled into it on accident, he should've just called the cops immediately knowing that their was a robbery happening.