Results: Table 1: Socio demographic information Characteristics Male Female Total P value n= 46 n= 186 N= 232 Age (Mean ± SD) 32.04 ± 7.3 31.17 ± 6.9 31.30 ± 7.0 20-24 years 3 (6.5) 21 (11.3) 24 (10.3) .874 25-29 years 18 (39.1) 71 (38.2) 89 (38.4) 30-34 years 10 (21.7) 33 (17.7) 43 (18.5) 35-39 years 8 (17.4) 35 (18.8) 43 (18.5) 40 years and above 7 (15.2) 26 (14.0) 33 (14.2) Religion Islam 42 (91.3) 182 (97.8) 224 (96.6) .029 Hindu 4 (8.7) 4 (2.2) 8 (3.4) Education No formal education 7 (15.2) 60 (32.3) 67 (28.9) .050 Up to primary level (1-5) 21 (45.7) 81 (43.5) 102 (44.0) Up to secondary level (6-10) 18 (39.1) 43 (23.1) 61 (26.3) Above secondary level 0 (0.0) 2 (1.1) 2 (0.9) Marital status …show more content…
“Marital status” associated with DOM2, DOM3 and DOM4. “Age” was associated with two domains (DOM1 and DOM4) of WHOQOL. “Total job duration” associated with DOM3. Variables that were considered for regression: Age, Education, Marital status, Total job duration/experience, Total monthly personal income, BMI. Discussion: Most of the respondents (n= 128; 53.9%) rated their overall quality of life as very good and good. 40.1% (n=93) reported ‘Neither poor nor good’ overall HRQOL. Whereas, a small percentage had ‘Poor’ (n=8, 3.4%) and ‘Very poor’ (n=6, 2.6%) HRQOL. Major respondents 75.4% (n=175) were satisfied with their health. This finding is consistent
‘Health’ is a very broad notion, affected by a wide range of individual characteristics, behaviours and contextual factors.
In 1946 the World Health Organisation (WHO) defined health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”. This definition integrates the main concepts of health and identifies that health can be viewed differently by individuals and groups (Bowden, 2006). Health and well-being are the result of a combination of physical, social, intellectual and emotional factors (Dunkley, 2000a).
As stated by the World Health Organization (WHO), ‘health’ is defined as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” (WHO, 1948). The health and wellbeing of individuals is generally determined by their circumstances and environment, a phenomenon referred to as the social determinants of health. WHO describes the social determinants of health as:
Naidoo and Wills(2001, p.47) “Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity’ - WHO (1946).” This definition falls into a holistic way of defining health, which believes that there are more areas to look at when thinking of health than just simply the absence of a disease. It considers the cause of why someone is ill and not just simply about ’fixing it’.
Armstrong, D., & Caldwell, D. (2004). Origins of the concept of quality of life in health
But over the past few decades, the definititon and concept of health has evolved to encompass more elements than just the physical well-being of a person. This is partly attributed to various researches and studies that have taken place around the world in the last 60 years. Already in 1948, the World Health Organization declared that health is “a state of complete physical, mental and social well being and not
Quality of life is how satisfied we are with our lives and whether there are parts of our health that affect this or inhibit this. For example if there was a lack of money in a family due to little financial support then their quality of life would not be good. This is because they would not be able to afford the necessities of life and other recreational activities.
Different people look at health in different ways. It can depend on their culture, environment, religion or age group. In order to have a clear understanding about how the people look at health, I have conducted a survey from a random sample of people who belongs to the above groups (e.g. people of different ages have been chosen).
In addition to exploring and identifying contributing factors to health-related quality of life or HRQL, Gorecki et al also determined if there is a relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes and these contributing factors. While this latter objective cannot be quantitatively determined, Gorecki et al have determined from their study that there are indications that indeed, HRQL outcomes are influenced by the identified contributing factors among PU patients. The contributing factors discovered and identified in the study were the
Quality of daily life is a major factor that in presented in this article. Burd-Sharps and Lewis agree when they write:
Health can be defined in many different ways, for example, the Bio-Medical model of health believes health to be the absence of pain, biological abnormalities and diseases. Whereas most Socio-medical models of health such as the World Health Organisation consider health to involve a range of different factors such as environment, social life and mental wellbeing alongside the more recognised factors of health e.g. pain and sickness. From a personal perspective, health should cover all aspects, whether it is social, environmental, psychological and physical. All of these aspects are important aspects to a person’s wellbeing. (Taylor & field 2003)
Healthy people 2020 used “general health status, health-related quality of life and well-being, determinants of
The World Health Organisation defined health: “State of complete physical and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease and infirmity” (WHO, 1946 p.100). Many factors influence health such as family traits, behaviours, access to quality healthcare and environment (quality of air, bad/good water and housing conditions) (WHO, 1946). The holistic view of health combines the mind (mental), body (physical), emotional and spiritual elements to a person (Ewes & Simnett, 2003).
(WHO, 1948) describes health as ‘a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease of infirmity’? There are other dimensions of health such as physical health, mental health and emotional health which can be broken down and looked at individually.
About 56 % or 28 respondents have replied average satisfied and 22% or 11 respondents replied satisfied in better health condition, as for better nutritional facilities, high calorie food, better health has been ensured. 18 % respondent has replied disagree because of low level increased of income. On the other head 2% respondent has respondent has replied highly Satisfied with the statement. (DSK Activity Report, 2015)