IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF SOURCES The focus of this investigation will be “To what extent was the Byzantine empire tolerant of cultural diversity?” and to analyze cultural and geographical characteristics of the Byzantine empire to further understand if this ancient state included diversity and multiculturalism. Therefore, Byzantium, Its Neighbours and Its Cultures: Diversity and Interaction by the Australian Association for Byzantine Studies is a source of great value to this investigation because of the great extent of information about Byzantine culture and the how it functioned from a variety of perspectives that were involved in this conference. Also, Cultural Diversity and the Breakdown of Byzantine Power in Asia Minor by Peter Charanis is a detailed analysis of Byzantium as a whole as well as Byzantine’s social structure, leadership, and the extent of cultural cohesiveness within the empire. Source: Byzantium, Its Neighbours and Its Cultures: Diversity and Interaction, XVIITH Biennial Conference. There is no one specific author because of the nature of the source, being a conference, however the keynote speaker is Professor Jonathan Shepard from the University of Cambridge. Also, there are a variety of speakers from different Universities around the world who participated in this conference. The conference took place at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia from July 20th to July 21st of 2012. This is a secondary source. The country of origin is Australia.
“The mother of the world has been killed,” stated a 5th century historian, bereft and appalled when the news of Rome’s fall had reached ear. Certainly his words hold truth, for Rome - the dauntingly colossal Empire engulfing the Mediterranean and all territories around it; the source of artistic, intellectual, and cultural ascendancy; the influential factor of brilliance in so many of the coexisting societies of the western world - was truly the predecessor and creator of all Western Civilization to come. However, what no one knew, was that the lasting impression this powerful and astonishing civilization would make upon the world, even if only through the works of fleeting memory or written text. As always, with loss
Last but not least, the crusades led to the decline of the Byzantine Empire by demolishing their economy. The Annales Herbipolenses demonstrates the Christians were so desperate for help, they took any and every person to fight, they did not require any person to be skilled. The crusades weakened the economy making people want to fight due to how poor they lived their lives especially those who held low social status such as serfs or peasants. The need for monetary support in the West left them vulnerable and ultimately led to the sacking of Constantinople (Doc 3.) This writer is anonymous but by the location of the writer, the writer must have had a Germanic nature, therefore the information must be valid because Germany was a Catholic nation,
The ancient Greeks and Romans were perhaps two of the greatest civilizations of the ancient world. These two civilizations thrived in their ancient environments which eventually led to a vast amount of prosperity within these two cultures. It is because of this prosperity that these ancient cultures were able to make a variety of advancements in literature, architecture, art and a variety of other fields. These two civilizations also produced some of the ancient world’s greatest writers, leaders, and philosophers. The cultures of ancient Greece and Rome made a number of contributions to western civilization in the form of advancements in literature, architecture, art, government, and philosophy.
Christianity experienced notable change during the Byzantine Era as a result of the fact that new ideas were introduced into the religion and because more and more cultural values from across the world started to pervade it. The religion was very different in Byzantium from how it was in the West principally because a series of Eastern ideas were adopted by Christian leaders. Christianity experienced a different development in the East when compared to the evolution that it experienced in the West. In the centuries lasting between the beginning of the Eastern half of the Roman Empire and the end of a small medieval state Christianity has practically been bombarded with Eastern ideas and with ideas that generally differed from the ones promoted in the West, eventually making it possible for "a distinct system of religious practice and devotion" (Krueger, 1) to emerge.
This book is a "Short History," of western empires which explain how European civilization and includes chronology of key events are influenced by the empires that was formed in it, like the Roman empire. It starts with Alexander and his Greek army and ends with the EU. Major events between these two events are empires like the Roman Empire, Byzantine Empire, the Catholic Church as an Empire, the Spanish Empire, British Empire, and the European Colonial influence into the 20th Century.
Eastern Europe had begun its transition from the Eastern Roman Empire into the Byzantine empire with the penetration of Christianity into all aspects of life. Both the
During the 17th to 18th century, The Roman Empire had gone through a cultural and religious metamorphous. Throughout this time, the roles of religion in the Islamic, Byzantine and Western European worlds altered the period of 600-750 with their similarities adhering to monotheism for one, and differences in regards to perspectives. These three cultures were all pretty diverse but they also shared some of the same roots and became heritors of the Roman Empire, built on different ideologies. The different ideologies of the Islamic, Byzantine and Western European worlds, consisted of different founders, places, and elements of worship, thus portraying how religion was indeed prominently central to governmental and social structures because of the large impact towards political laws.
Much of past civilizations have endured many failures and triumphs throughout their existence. In the third century, there were many civilizations that started to flourish. One of these civilizations that started to expand was the Byzantine civilization. The Byzantine civilization, also regarded as Byzantium, was part of the Roman Empire which was divided in 395 AD. Byzantium had shared the same attitude, as the Roman Empire, toward exercising its authority over its citizens and throughout its empire. The Islamic civilization had started thrive in the fifth century. The Islamic civilization was unified together as unison by Islam and it has expanded its civilization throughout parts of Europe through jihad. Because of their expansions
was wracked by religious and political conflict. And Leo III issued a ban on religious
The Byzantine Empire and Western Europe originally were part of the Roman Empire, but by the middle Ages(medieval times), they were very different, even though they did share some common traits, but by the 300's, the Byzantine Empire had far surpassed Western Europe in trade and economics and political unity, while both empires were having arguments over religion.
A common demonization in both civilization is that they used religion to unite their people and also a reason to expand their empires. The Islamic political system is the pure example of a Theocratic State, in which the ultimate power resides in God and those whose behalf political, religion and other forms of authority are exercised. The Byzantine Empire shared the same characteristics with the Roman Empire in the way they exercised their power and authority of its citizen and throughout the empire. The Byzantine Empire political system used a system of Caesaropapism (Studymoose.com). It is a political system where the Emperor is the head of the church and the matter of state and religion are
In this course, we have learned about three medieval worlds that existed in regions bordering the Mediterranean Sea: the Latin-Christian-ruled world, the Byzantine-ruled world, and the Muslim ruled world. Some historians argue that all of these worlds were really part of one larger Mediterranean Cultural world, while others argue that each world was actually very different. I stand on the side of separate but connected in this debate. The extent that these three worlds were similar politically was the constant power struggles, Culturally the connection through trade, and Religiously their prevalent worship of god. The extent were they different politically was their diplomatic/war relations, Culturally their language and arts, and Religiously how they practiced their religion.
Following the decline of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE, a new empire rose up in the ashes. This new empire, the Byzantine Empire, was a culmination of Western Roman cultures and tradition, yet, it also contains many distinctive features. Originating from the same empire, the two empires display similar cultural roots.
Before 1450 The Byzantine and Islamic Empires both had their similarities and differences in the way they governed. Islamic caliphates and the Byzantine Empire both appointed their political leaders as religious leaders why? Because they both have more power over their people. They would control the areas laws and duties but also their religion. The big difference of the two empires was their religious practices, The Islamic caliphates consisted of Islam and Muslims but the byzantine empire believed in orthodox Christians.
Though both had similar roots, they both took these similar bases & formed it into their own way. Both the Byzantine Empire and Ancient Roman have similar aspects, but each one made it unique. To better understand the similarities and differences of the Byzantine Empire and Ancient Romans one must look at each civilization’s cultural ideas, religion, & dependence on lower class.