preview

Children Of Men : A Dystopian Film : Children Of Men

Decent Essays

On the surface, the 2006 film Children of Men, simply seems to be a dystopian movie about a man in an infertile society trying to get the first pregnant woman in 18 years to safety. Although this interpretation isn’t necessarily wrong, such a simplification of the film wouldn’t do justice to the many deliberate and symbolic choices that director Alfonso Cuarón made. The real story, Cuarón’s portrait of society, isn’t found completely in the plot itself, but rather hidden in the background and in the use of fertility as a symbol. To get a full picture, one must not simply rely on the plot, but analyze Cuarón’s subtler choices as well. In the documentary short film, Possibility of Hope, Alfonso Cuarón invites different scientists and philosophers to both talk about the movie and the world around them. In it, philosopher Slavoj Žižek says “a great portrait is more real than the person it portrays.” Although open to interpretation, it seems like Žižek is right, especially in the case of Children of Men. When we see flaws in media, it is easier to form an opinion and call it bad, but in real life we are more hesitant to recognize the flaws of society. Children of Men wasn’t just meant to be a dystopian “what if?” Cuarón took problems/values found in past -and current- society and deliberately placed them in the movie to reflect on humanity in an indirect way. In Children of Men, Cuarón uses the loss of fertility as a symbol for the loss of hope. In a world in which bombings

Get Access