The Asian region is known (in history) for its successful empire's and how futuristic its technology was. Three of the thriving areas in Asia are China, Japan, and Korea. Throughout their histories, those three countries especially during the Ming and Qing periods (China), Tokugawa period (Japan), and Korea. They have different ways of life and some aspects are similar. The Ming, Qing, Tokugawa and Korea are more different than similar because of their government, their social structure, and their trade.
Korea, China, and Japan's governments are different because of their structure. In Qing China, they had the same structure as the Ming but with the Manchus had a few changes. They, "tried to establish their legitimacy as China's rightful
…show more content…
In Ming China, the Europeans (especially the Portuguese) were trading silk, the ideas of Christianity, clocks, prisms, and instruments. After a while, the Ming only let the Europeans traders come to Canton. During Qing China, they had problems with the Russian tsar as the Russian traders didn't kowtow (A Chinese ritual in which people of lower rank would touch his head to the floor at the knees of the superior) and this made the Chinese angry. After a while, they signed the Treaty of Nerchinisk. In Japan, leaders bought firearms from the Europeans to make Daimyo side with the leaders and stop Daimyo that aren't with them. Also, they were amazed by tobacco, cotton, clocks, and eye glasses. In Korea, European merchants and missionaries spread goods into Korea because of Koreans traveling to China. This resulted in small Christian communities throughout Korea.
To conclude, Ming and Qing China, Tokugawa Japan, and Korea were more different than similar. In their government they had the same ideas but not the same government. In social classes, some societies accepted merchants as high-middle class people while other societies thought of merchants as low lives. These three great societies were more different than similar because of their government, social structure, and
While differing ecomically and politically in their responses to western penetration, Japan and China had similarities in the way of geography. China only allowed Europeans to trade with it in a limited number of ports and cities, which limited the amount of goods Europeans were allowed to transfer overseas. Japan isolated itself as a whole from trade for an entire decade, and when it did open it was cautious towards westerners. Additionally, both were bordered by the ocean at least to a certain extent – Japan was surrounded entirely, being an island, by water, and a large percentage of China’s borders was water. It is because of this that the third similarity arose – both did trade by ocean. China with Britain, simply because it was the easiest, cheapest, and most efficient form of travel between the two, and Japan because there was obviously no choice considering Japan is an island. These geographical similarities arose purely from the coincidence that both were bordered by the ocean, which created the necessity for boats and by the time the opportunity for trade
Another major similarity of India and China was the cause and effects of the declines of their golden ages. Both India and China had strong enough civilizations to withstand the challenges they faced and not completely fall. Because of China’s strong political system and because of India’s uniform religion, both civilizations were able to recover and revive themselves. Nomadic invaders attacked both civilizations and this was a setback but strong emperors helped regain order. The strength of the political systems was also challenged. Arab invaders tried to convert India to Islam but failed because Indian religious leaders worked to strengthen HInduism. In China bureaucrats became corrupt and started fighting for power and assassinating each other. Thankfully the Sui and Tang dynasties worked to regain power and they restored Confucianism because they knew it worked in the past. India and China lost power but they were able to maintain stability.
Ancient South Asian and Chinese societies have many things in common, but they also have many differences in their ways of living. From social aspects to religious aspects, Ancient South Asian and Chinese societies have developed over time to become their own unique societies.
China has changed in certain ways and remained the same in others from the early Golden Ages to the late 1900s. China has experienced a series of cultural and political transformations, shaping the lives of many Chinese citizens. Culturally, the country’s art and literature hardly changed for almost eight hundred years. Along with their culture, China remained politically the same from the beginning of the Golden Ages all the way until the 1800s. On the other hand, China’s government and society were restructured after new leaders took over. From a monarch to total communism, China’s society had a multitude of new ideas and policies they had to adapt to.
Classical China and Classical India were two great civilizations that are known for their influences on modern day China and India. Even so, they showed their own unique signs as they developed, with some similar qualities, and others that were not so comparable. Both Agricultural based civilizations had their own technological advancements, and China and India shared many similarities, but they had differences such as the hierarchy of social structure, religious influences, cultural practices, and the importance of trade in the economy.
Feudal Japan and Ming China were two times in history within these similar countries, that have been around since ancient times. These countries have similar and different traditions, a way of doing things, that have defined them as a civilization and a world power. The Japanese and Chinese had times where select families or people were in control, dynasty, because of their ranks and their abilities, in addition their social classes were similar in the way they treated people, and how people treated other people depending on their jobs and their status. There were the shoguns,a hereditary commander-in-chief in feudal Japan, and in China there were the emperors, the ones ruling the empire (land), these were the people that were at the top
Once these societies were flowing with western influence and ideas in their societies, the people of China and Japan began to try and adopt to these ideas and become big industrial societies as well. In China, these ideas were supported by the people although their government tried to diminish these ideas, while in Japan, the government felt that they had no other choice but to reform, so they began to embrace western development. In
Earlier this week we focused on ancient eastern China during the Han Dynasty and the east asian philosophies that arose during this time period. We reviewed three great asian philosophers, Confucius, Lao Tzu, and Buddha. In class we also picked from a list of quotes from these three philosophers a quote they said that really resonated with us and wrote a descriptive essay on it and shared it in class for extra credit.
Emperor- the emperor was at the top of the entire hierarchy and he ruled over the Dynasty while his family was rich and
China and Japan had similar but different experiences with the Western civilization. China and Japan reacted differently to the Western nations and it was China’s reactions to the West that would break the Chinese’s isolation leaving their traditions behind. The Industrial trade in Europe and the United States had created a gap between Asia and the West, This left china and Japan far behind technologically and they were not able to stand up against the western nations and although at different times China and Japan both ended up having to sign unequal treaties, and to open their ports for merchants.
China and Japan are two unique civilizations that went through similar, yet vastly different changes throughout their histories. Their growth and response to other nations differed in many ways in government, lifestyle, and general well-being. One of the main causes for such difference between the countries is the way the West influenced each region, and the way China and Japan responded to this influence. China focused more on the idea of being a "status oriented" society, while Japan was more "goal oriented" based. In China, anyone had the ability to better themselves and change their status through civil examinations given by the government. Western impact however slowly changed this old age system. Japan's caste system viewed
in the US, upper, middle, and lower. They are determined by money, the rich are
Throughout the course of East Asian history, Japan has been largely influenced by the Asian mainland. From ancient times to the medieval period, significant contributions to Japan can be seen coming from both Korea and China. Both of these countries diffused elements of their cultures to form the basis of Japanese society – namely China. These foreigners would influence various aspects of society including technology, philosophy, politics, and religion.
Consider the history of Japan: How is Japan similar to Korea and how is it unique, due to its island location? Both Japan and Korea have a very large population of people and are extremely advanced in technology. The population in Japan is said to have about 123 million people; however, Korea has about 47,275,000 people. Another thing in common that Japan and Korea both share is that they both share a love for wrestling but, in Japan it’s called Sumo and, In Korea it’s called Sirium. Both countries are known for the production on cars, cameras, computers and other types of high end technology. Japan’s art was very similar to the artwork of Korea. Both countries also share the religion of Buddhism and are big producers of ships and trade. Most
6. regional trade has increased among similar cultures and floundered among dissimilar ones. A classic example of this notion is how Japan has not been able to be very successful in bringing together other east Asian countries due to its different culture, while the common culture between China and other East Asian countries has managed to expand regional trade amongst them.