Christian Amanpour Tetalk Analysis

The power and consequently the responsibility of media, especially mainstream, is something that shouldn’t be underestimated. It often sets the agenda amongst the general public and is the reference point for the majority of the discussion surrounding it. For many, what they see and read in the media forms the basis of their opinions on most important topics. Despite warnings not to, many believe that everything they read in the media must be true.

In today’s society, remaining connected and knowledgeable of current events and the newest trends is vital to staying ahead in business, education, and social standing. This information is supplied to everyone through the internet, newspapers, television, and radio. One can tune into stations such as CNN, NBC, Fox News, Al-Jazeera, and many others (“SQs of Media Outlets”). In order to meet the needs of viewers, readers, and listeners, the ideal media system would contain accurate, quick information, with a purely impartial view on the facts as they are known. However, this modern media system has not maintained an objective view, pushing opinionated and slanted reporting onto the population in order to create profit and gain customers. The exploitation of information media for personal gain has created a toxic and inaccurate present, constant in today’s society.

In our evolving world, it is difficult to differentiate the truth with the constant pour of information It is a journalist's job to report the truth and to be sure that they have reliable information. A journalist must be successful in performing fast-checking before they can validate a story. Credibility is the backbone on journalism, and once it is destroyed it can be difficult to regain. It is also vital that journalists remain free from faction. When journalists break the obligations of journalism they are subject to criticism and distrust of the public. It becomes an issue when journalists jeopardize the public's ability to be free and

People must carefully sift through the abundant amounts of information from the media in order to find factual information and avoid dissonance in their lives from false media messages. Political, scientific, and social publications can include bias from the journalists, so kudos to the media for finding inventive ways to craft stories in order to sell their publications. Separating fact from fiction has always been difficult and it is increasingly becoming more difficult to discern as journalists have hidden agendas and tainted points of view. One must be vigilant and skeptical and gather information from many different sources in order to weed out bias and misinformation.

In today’s new, the truth is often being withheld from viewers. Many of the stations that we trust to deliverer facts are now being filled with opinions. David Westin, the president of ABC News since 1997, provides insight to this growing problem. In his compelling argument, he states that news channels are often giving fact-less opinions and misleading the viewers. Often they cannot even distinguish between fact and opinion. Westin backs up his arguments using logic, facts, and personal experience. These means lead him to persuade the reader to believe that opinion journalism is, and will continue to be, a huge problem.

Nowadays journalists have the responsibility to report facts as accurately, objectively, and disinterestedly as is humanly possible. ‘’The, honest, self-disciplined, well-trained reporter seeks to be a propagandist for nothing but the truth’’ (Casey, 1944b).

However, as internet journalism rose it becomes a crucial skill to be media literate and to find out for yourself if the information and the medium you’re getting it from are reliable. This potentially misleading display of information that fuels these article headlines make them huge risks in enticing users into obtaining false information. The beauty of social media, though, is that it is the epitome of an open idea network that is filled with hundreds of different mediums, therefore thousands of different

In today’s society there are hundreds of different news articles written everyday. Sometimes it may be hard to determine the truth from what is fake. A news article by John Stossel called “Fake News, Misleading News, Click-Bait and the Media’s Biases” attempts to address the meaning of the controversy of what ‘fake news’ really is. After reading the article it can be concluded that the news is divided, doesn’t focus on what is important, and is a money driven industry.

The process of making news encompasses selections by newsmakers, who tell the world as they see. Journalists’ account, therefore, is at best a representation of events. There are ways for bias to be inserted into news stories, and they rests on the frame media institutions choose to follow. Meanwhile, the act of selection is affected by various elements, which dictate journalists to work out values of news. To conclude, it can be seen that news continue to be biased once the present state of journalism

However, Storytelling has been noted as helping traditional forms of journalism become more interesting and help to retain the audience (Emde, Klimmt and Schluetz 2015) and it could be argued that Storytelling and Journalism may be incompatible, but a necessary pairing nonetheless. But where exactly does the balance lie? At what point does storytelling take precedence over the journalistic principles?

To try and prevent the expanse of news stories and articles that are fabricated or false demands the need for stricter news content monitoring and ramifications for the violations of ethical laws and the increased praise and compensation for all those who invest in the time to examine and inquire a piece before publication, confirming its authenticity or source from multiple channels. (Encyclopedia.com, 2015) Discouraging journalists from publishing news stacked with sensationalistic material cannot be an easy task, given the deep rooted commitment to the ideology of freedom of the press and media’s need to publish what sells. Which is why it is imperative that readers acquire incredulity and be able to pin point unjustified sensationalism

As we can all label ourselves as authors, by creating our own web pages and blogs, and with the direct efficiency we can collect our information at, it is questionable as to how much of the web’s content is amateur and therefore lacking in authenticity and credibility. He warns that old media is a dying medium as the new media has been replaced by mass media through the likes of informational web pages such as Wikipedia that not only breed ignorance and publish incorrect and unconfirmed information, but social media channels such as YouTube that are equally as unwarranted by creating a new meaning for ‘entertainment’. Therefore, perhaps news has been blurred and masked as information that can be accessed through a variety of mediums created and written by anyone with the means to voice it. The four purpose of writing: to entertain, to persuade, to advise and to inform should therefore be emphasised to avoid entertaining, persuasive and advisory articles being projected as informational

To understand that most U.S. reporters not only have lost sight of real journalism is to also realize that those same reporters sometimes knowingly hide the truth beneath many lays of non-important information.

It is often suggested by scholars that the world and in all its content is ambiguous, there is no universal meaning, nothing can be interpreted the same way. Opinions are constantly clashing and facts somehow constructed, or tempered during the processes of news production. News becomes the fictions of reality; it becomes a way of story telling, made to the taste of the viewer, depending on the society of course. The same stories carry different values depending where when and how the stories are broadcasted, I will be talking about this in this essay. There are two approaches to report a piece of news; the realist, purely factual no interpretations given and very clear in usage of language. This method differs to that of the

In today¡¦s society journalism is under close scrutiny and is losing its credibility. Sensationalism effects both those who receive it in addition to those who report it. This essay will review the history of sensationalism in the media, clearly demonstrate how sensationalism effects ours views on journalism, and confront the ethical dilemmas that journalists must face between reporting objectively and reporting what sells. This will be accomplished by investigating various sources, including articles published on the Internet as well as those published in newspapers and magazines.