How Sensationalism Affects Everyone Involved
In today¡¦s society journalism is under close scrutiny and is losing its credibility. Sensationalism effects both those who receive it in addition to those who report it. This essay will review the history of sensationalism in the media, clearly demonstrate how sensationalism effects ours views on journalism, and confront the ethical dilemmas that journalists must face between reporting objectively and reporting what sells. This will be accomplished by investigating various sources, including articles published on the Internet as well as those published in newspapers and magazines.
Throughout history sensationalism has been represented in all shapes and sizes. Celebrity journalism is amongst
…show more content…
In addition CNN ran a story on Vietnam that was proven inaccurate. The radio waves and television sets are flooded with sensationalized shows featuring beautiful young women and handsome men. The news watched today is sensationalized with one catastrophe after another. Is excitement what the market wants, or is the excitement expected because of a precedent set by the corporate owned media? Even in the reporting of sports, sensationalism rules. Channels like ESPN, owned by Disney , report homeruns, slam-dunks, and touchdowns with a dramatic twist. What effect does sensationalism have on the media¡¦s market? A survey done by the American Society of Newspaper Editors reports that ¡§spelling errors, bias, and sensationalism are corroding the credibility of newspapers.¡¨ The survey shows:
„h 23% say they find factual errors in the news stories at least once a week.
„h 50% believe there are particular groups or people that get a ¡§special break¡¨ in news coverage, while 45% feel that others ¡§don¡¦t get a fair shake.¡¨
„h 78% agree with the assessment that there is bias in the news media.
„h 80% believe that sensational stories get lots of news coverage because they are exciting, not because they are important.
Furthermore, George Gerbner has studied the effects of television violence (sensationalism) for more than thirty years. Through his studies, George Gerbner has found that violence seen on television does not promote violent behavior. It does much worse;
Media coverage of news events can be disseminated to the general public in any number of different ways and media biases often “reflects certain organizational and/or professional preferences or values” (Bennett 2011, 173). In fact, Lundman (2003) points out “that journalists assess the newsworthiness of homicides occurrences using the relative frequency of particular types of murders and how well specific murder occurrences mesh with stereotypical race and gender typifications (357).” In addition, Johnson (2012) felt that the real job of media was to “create a message that…grabs public attention (62).” In other words, can the media grab the public’s attention and hold it?
Now I realise it seems a bit hypocritical of me to attack the media’s representation of a news event when I myself am a part of the hype-generating circus we call mass media. However, the voice of my wise, high-school English teacher echoes in my subconscious that we should always be critical of the texts we consume and conscious of the
It has recently come to my attention that not enough people understand how great bias in media has been to our lives. Each day we wake up and see near one or more biases in the media, lying at the foot of our beds. It is wonderful to be able to wake up and smile each morning because of this. Decisions are made based on what people hold to be true. History has shown instances where severly biased media. The most recognizable evidence being WWII and Stalin. "Because of the status quo bias, the media ignore any position that advocates radical change"
Newspapers and other forms of news are very vital communication methods in the world today. The goal of news is to sell us their ideas by being biased and talking about how their idea is best. News can give us biased information although, the viewer could do further research on the
In the late 1800’s, Julius Chambers checked herself into a mental asylum undercover as a mental patient and began composing one of the first forms of muckraker journalism, which exposed the abuse inmates were subjected to within these asylums. After Julius Chambers infamous account of the asylums, muckraker journalism spread like wildfire, leading to exposed political corruption and social scandals. Since the muckraker movement, news has become exceedingly relevant in people’s lives to get information regarding sports, the world, science, entertainment, etc. However, as news has evolved its values have changed with the times to provide their subscribers news best akin to their interests and values. News today values tragedy and oddity while
During this week I investigated many different news sources and different tactics they use. My research has shown the incredibly strong bias that the media has. To get a full grasp of the biases I had to use source diversity. My sources ranged from social media, to television, to web-based articles. Through my research, I discovered the effective and prevalent uses of loaded language, social media, sensationalism, bias in quotes, and the role of gatekeepers in media.
According to research obtained by Cornell University scientists, 92% of Americans watch TV, 87% read newspapers, and 81% specifically watch local or national televised news stations…
To understand what state the modern media system is in, one must firmly understand what bias is. Media bias is present “when a political belief or commercial interest distorts the level of reporting” (“Media Bias” 1). If a political station provides positive or accurate information to only one side, then the station can be considered biased. Another form of bias is known as sensationalism. Sensationalism is the creation of panic or fear by over-reporting or over-inflating individual news stories, often blurring facts or reporting speculation as facts. A modern and familiar example of media
Until the 1980s, the control of the media was in the hands of the national government. From then, the control shifted to private outlets and by the 1990’s, there were more than fifty multinational companies who controlled it (“Mass Media”). Today, only about six major companies control the larger fraction of media in America (Williams, Par. 1). Norman Solomon wrote in the New Political Science Journal that most reporters and editors work for just a few huge companies. These journalists and editors are on the payroll for “mega-media institutions”, of which, only about six exist (Solomon 297). How much will the public learn if these companies generally control the output of information?
This essay is looking in depth at the reliability and accuracy of polls in the media.
Nowadays journalists have the responsibility to report facts as accurately, objectively, and disinterestedly as is humanly possible. ‘’The, honest, self-disciplined, well-trained reporter seeks to be a propagandist for nothing but the truth’’ (Casey, 1944b).
The article continues to explain the growing concern among journalists about Sinclair’s actions, thereby continuing on the path of creating fear amongst readers. While there is truth to fear about the situation, the level of concern being created is more than it should be, possible misleading some readers into fearing right wing indoctrination or right wing political takeovers, as liberal audiences of the New York Times may be more willing to believe. The 70% statistic used does not account for the fact that not all people who have access to the TV stations will actually watch them. It is unlikely that all these people will actually view these right wing segments on a day to day basis, as the article leads one to believe. The statistic does not account for people who do not use their televisions on a daily basis, or do not actually watch the stations screening the right wing stories. Te 70% does not account for the proportion of television stations viewers have access to to the number of stations that have these segments. For example, the article mentions that Sinclair Broadcasting Group owns around 200 TV stations. While this is a sizable amount, many television plans have over one thousand stations, and many viewers may not even look at these 200 stations. The article also does not mention whether all 200 stations are featured on all of these 70% of households. It is very possible that many television sets of this 70% of household may only include 10 Sinclair stations. This would mean that the probability of coming across one of these stations is even smaller, but those 10 stations would still count as reaching an American household, going towards the 70%
In today’s media-saturated world, traditional media outlets are still considered a very important source for news information, but many people look to outside, specialized media outlets for information that appeals to their personal interests and attitudes. However, there is an increasing concern that journalism is gearing away from factuality, and is instead incorporating opinions and gossip into the mix, as well as breaking news into bits and pieces. Additionally, consolidation among media corporations has affected the industry. Consolidation raises both benefits and concerns: increased diversity, larger conglomerate power, decreased viewpoints, etc. Not only do these rising trends reduce the credibility and diversity of news sources, but they have the potential to flood the media market with low-quality news. Overall, these two trends can be seen in today’s market, and have an enormous effect on the landscape of the journalistic environment.
More and more media sensationalisms are used in news coverage today because more and more reporters want their works make the headlines in the press. Big events, like the Las Vagus shooting, that everyone is paying attention to are absolutely targets of these reporters who want to use sensationalism. Two pieces of news articles concerning the Las Vagus shooting are going to be analyzed and compared in this paper based on the concept of sensationalism.
Media coverage over the years has expanded quickly with the help of new age technology, forcing today’s society on total reliance of media coverage. With the news in the palm of our hands, we are constantly being updated on worldwide dilemmas every second, but who takes advantage of coverage? Using coverage for the downfall of others or to help them prosper. As I have channeled my research on how politics, uses both negative and positive coverage to assist them during elections and small businesses and major corporation needing media coverage to be viewed as credible. Many