Citizenship Is An Outdated Notion Of The 21st Century

Around 500 BCE, a new idea began to take shape on the Greek and Italian peninsulas of the Mediterranean Sea. That idea was that people were citizens of a state or empire. By the sixth century a different idea formed and that was Citizenship. Citizenship is the status given by a government to some or all of its people. Each citizen had a balance called social contract theory of citizenship which was their individual rights such as the right to vote, and their individual responsibilities, such as the duty to serve one country. Romans citizen was more judged on how their behavior was towards the family, neighbors, and property. While Athens focused more the citizen responsibility than the citizen rights. Citizenship was a thing both in Athens

According to the Oxford dictionary the term citizenship can be defined as: “The state of being vested with the rights and privileges, and duties of a citizen.” In the short story ‘Borders’ by Thomas King the term citizenship is of main focus. Through the many borders that are presented within the story, King argues that citizenship overlooks culture and heritage, instead focusing on a single border: that being where the individual resides. The short story is narrated from the young boy’s perspective, as him and his mother struggle to cross the Canadian-American border to visit the young boy’s sister Latitia. The young boy and his mother are not able to cross the border

Are you a citizen? Maybe you are. Maybe you aren’t. A citizen is a legally recognized subject. Citizenship is a status given by the government. Rome and Athens had very different systems of citizenship. But which system, Athens’ or Rome’s, was better? Some say it was Rome.

2. I do not think Chavez expected her audience to agree with her position as it was posted in the politically conservative section of the Wall Street Journal. Before I read the political background section of Linda Chavez, I had thought the author to be liberal. But after reading the excerpt I the beginning of the publication, I noticed that she was a Hispanic Conservative. I could tell that Linda Chavez did not expect her audience to agree with her when she stated that “Repealing birthright citizenship is a terrible idea.” Most conservatives wish to dismiss birthright citizenship, but in this passage she explains the significance of it, and what it would do to the future of the nation.

The concept of “citizenship” is a social construction because everyone in our society plays a part of defining citizenship. One may refer to citizenship as being a naturally born citizen or and immigrant who got their citizenship papers. Social media, news outlets, and even our family may change our perception of citizenship. Citizenship is usually tied in with immigration and how we think of immigrants. Thus, it would have never existed without society’s help of shaping the meaning and norms. Therefore, this has formed bills, debates, and independent opinions. These include the I-Word Campaign, the DREAM Act, Anti-Immigrant Movement,

A citizen is a person who is a legal resident of a place and has certain rights and privileges that non-citizens do not have. In most cases those rights have to do with participating in the government and electing leaders. Citizens usually also have responsibilities, such as paying taxes, following laws, or serving in the military. The concept of citizenship developed with the idea of constitutional government, which began in ancient Greece. Until that time people were subjects of their rulers and had no political rights. In early societies that recognized citizens, such as ancient Greece and ancient Rome, citizens were limited to male property owners. Today the concept of citizenship has expanded in many parts of the world. It now includes

Birth Right citizenship is a legal right to citizenship for all children born in a country 's territory, regardless of parentage. But many people use the term to indicate the general or specific roles, rights or duties of people within a given society. To federal government officials, a person either is or isn 't a legal "citizen" of the United States. The Preamble to the United States Constitution states: “We the people of the United States, in order to form a

American citizenship is and should be a birthright. It is law that anybody born on U.S. soil is automatically a citizen of these United States of America. “Jus Soli”, otherwise known as the right of soil”, was created off of the principles enacted within the Fourteenth Amendment to the constitution. We have abided by this law since July of 1868 and to repeal or even make efforts at reforming it would be a terrible

Citizenship tends to give an individual a membership in a national community. In terms of liberal democracies, it makes them have the right to; take part freely in public activities, run for an office, and the right to vote; on the other hand the individual has the obligation of paying tax. Based on the larger international community, citizenship forms a powerful media of social closure in two ways: the boundary of citizenship paves way for rich states to draw a line separating its citizens from potential immigrants who are from poor countries. In another way, it provide a base that states use to create internal boundaries that is separating citizens from foreign residents, in terms of associating some given rights and privileges with national citizenship.

We are all part of some community whether we choose to acknowledge it or not. I consider myself part of the Latin Community. I also consider myself part of my local city townhouse community. I am also part of my work community. Citizenship in the Latin community means proving the stereotypes wrong. I have to contribute to the small percentage of Latino voters, non-criminals, high school, and college graduates. I have to continue to be professional even when people are ignorant and treat me as a minority. Citizenship in my city involves me giving back to that community. Cleaning up my neighborhood and reporting crimes is one way. Respecting local police and not breaking laws. Citizenship in my townhouse community involves participating in board

US citizenship is the legal status as a person, it means access rights, immunities and benefits such as federal assistance. Thus, for a migrant to access American citizenship or nationality must follow a process of naturalization.

The dual definition of citizenship from May Joseph’s article Nomadic Identities: The Performance of Citizenship, can be used to analyze the different forms of citizenship that are presented in the film, Bend it Like Beckham, directed by Gurinder Chadha. Citizenship is typically referred to as someone as being considered a member of a country under specific laws. This general idea of citizenship is further analyzed in Nomadic Identities: The Performance of Citizenship. The article presents the idea that citizenship is found to be more than a member of a country and is concluded that citizenship can be much more personal and unique to each individual person. There is more than one definition

According to the reading “ Thinking Citizenship in a Revolutionary Arab Word” the author Maya Mikdashi, argues that issues related to citizenship and nationalism in the Arab Middle East require extensive processes of critical analysis and intervention. In this respect, Mikdashi referred to the opinion of several authors (e.g. Wedeen, L, Mamdani, M. and Brubacker, R.) who advocated the concept of global, universal or world citizenship. She further added that the Arab uprisings, in which the brutal authoritarian regimes across the region have been fiercely challenged force political scholars to think critically of the pros and cons of nationalism and citizenship in the region.

Firstly, if citizenship denotes the membership statute of individuals and social groups belonging to a political community (namely, a

“Law and freedom must be indivisible partners. For without law, there can be no freedom, only chaos and disorder; and without freedom, law is but a cynical veneer for injustice and oppression” (Reagan, 1984). Former president Ronald Reagan accurately states how The United States should control the citizenship model that is practiced today. There have been many choices made and paths followed that have interrupted this right of being that expresses a competent structure; how our nation purposefully expands the population, while keeping in remain a unified, worthy, and patriotic body of people to hold that title of an American. As The United States of America runs on a dual policy track today, one being Civic-Assimilationist and the other being Multiculturalism, I stand on the belief to propose the U.S. to run singly on a Civic-Assimilationist citizenship policy.